BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
SEMINOLE COUNTY, FLORIDA
October 12, 2021
The following is a non-verbatim transcript of the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS MEETING OF SEMINOLE COUNTY, FLORIDA, held at 1:30 p.m., on Tuesday, October 12, 2021, in Room 1028 of the SEMINOLE COUNTY SERVICES BUILDING at SANFORD, FLORIDA, the usual place of meeting of said Board.
Present:
Chairman Lee Constantine (District 3)
Vice Chairman Amy Lockhart (District 4)
Commissioner Robert Dallari (District 1)
Commissioner Jay Zembower (District 2)
Commissioner Andria Herr (District 5)
County Manager Nicole Guillet
County Attorney Bryant Applegate
Deputy Clerks Terri Porter and Kyla Farrell
Work Session Agenda Items #1 and #2 were heard in the morning.
OPENING CEREMONIES
Pastor Nick Jones, Church of Christ, Sanford gave the invocation. Donna Walsh, Director of the Florida Department of Health for Seminole County, led the Pledge of Allegiance.
AWARDS AND PRESENTATIONS
Agenda Item #3 – 2021-2901
Lorie Bailey Brown, Resource Management Director, announced the Achievement of Excellence in Procurement Award from the National Procurement Institute.
Districts 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 voted AYE.
CONSENT AGENDA
With regard to public participation, no one spoke in regard to the Consent Agenda; Katrina Shadix submitted Written Comment Forms in connection with Items #6, #25, and #26, and public input was closed.
Chairman Constantine confirmed with the County Manager that staff would like to pull Items #16 and #32. They both will be brought back at a later date. Commissioner Zembower asked that Item #33 be pulled for separate discussion.
Motion by Commissioner Dallari, seconded by Commissioner Zembower, to approve the following:
County Manager’s Office
Economic Development
4. Approve and authorize the Chairman to execute the Business Incubator Partnership Agreement with the University of Central Florida Research Foundation, Inc., in the amount of $250,000 per year for a total of three (3) years (FY2021/22, FY2022/23 and FY2023/24) to support the UCF Business Incubator-Winter Springs. (2021-2939)
5. Approve and authorize the Chairman to execute a Gift Commitment Funding Agreement for Seminole State College of Florida in the amount of $175,000 per year for three (3) years (FY2021/22, FY2022/23, and FY2023/24) to support programs offered by the Seminole State College Center for Business Development. (2021-2942)
Tourism Development
6. Approve and authorize the Chairman to execute a Tourist Development Tax Funding Agreement with the Central Florida Zoological Society, Inc., in the amount of $300,000 for the FY2021/22 funding allocation for marketing, advertising, maintenance, enhancements, repairs, and improvements. (2021-3002)
7. Approve and authorize the Chairman to execute a Tourism Development Tax Funding Agreement with Sanford Main Street, Inc., in the amount of $50,000 for the FY2021/22 funding allocation for marketing and advertising. (2021-2965)
Community Services
Business Office
8. Approve and authorize the Chairman to execute the Agreement between Seminole County and Central Florida Family Health Center, Inc. d/b/a True Health for CDBG CV-1 Funding in the amount of $900,000 to provide emergency treatment to homeless, uninsured or underinsured residents of Seminole County. (2021-2966)
9. Approve and authorize the Chairman to execute the Florida Department of Health in Seminole County Health Services Agreement FY2021-2022 in the amount of $60,000 to provide health care programs and services to homeless, uninsured and underinsured residents of Seminole County. (2021-2911)
10. Approve and authorize the Chairman to execute the Contract between Seminole County and the State of Florida Department of Health for Operation of the Seminole County Health Department Contract Year 2021-2022 in the amount not to exceed $807,970. (2021-2912)
11. Approve and authorize the Chairman to execute the Florida Department of Health in Seminole County Teen Outreach Program (TOP) Agreement FY2021-2022 in the amount of $81,000 to provide trained facilitators to deliver a youth-focused education program. (2021-2913)
12. Approve and authorize the Chairman to execute the Florida Department of Health in Seminole County Integrated System of Care Agreement for FY2021-2022 in the amount of $100,000 to extend services to impoverished communities in Seminole County. (2021-2914)
13. Approve and authorize the Chairman to execute the Medical System of Care Agreement with The Local Health Council of East Central Florida, Inc. d/b/a Health Council of East Central Florida, Inc., in the amount of $132,000 which provides outpatient medical health treatment services to uninsured and underinsured residents of Seminole County for either free or at a reduced cost basis. (2021-2917)
14. Approve and authorize the Chairman to execute the Aspire Health Partners, Inc. Transportation Program Agreement in the amount of $25,000 to help transport uninsured Seminole County residents for mental health services. (2021-2918)
Community Assistance
15. Approve the Homeless Partnership Agreement FY2021-2022 (Impact Homelessness Fund) in the amount of $143,755 with Pathway Homes of Florida, Inc., Homeless Services Network of Central Florida, Inc. (HSN), and Health Care Center for the Homeless, Inc., for continued support of the chronically homeless population; and authorize the Chairman to execute agreements with the subrecipient agencies as needed. (2021-2945)
16. Pulled from the agenda the request to approve and authorize the Chairman to execute the State Housing Initiatives Partnership (SHIP) Agreement with Embrace Families Solutions, Inc., in the amount $65,000 for the provision of Rapid Re-housing to benefit low-income residents in Seminole County. (2021-2946)
17. Approve and authorize the Chairman to execute the Community Services Block Grant-CV Funding Agreement FY2021-2022 with Hair in Motion of NY (HIMONY) Apprenticeship Training Program, Inc., in the amount of $30,000 utilizing Community Services Block Grant COVID (CSBG-CV) funding. (2021-2947)
18. Approve and authorize the Chairman to execute the Homeless Services Network of Central Florida Community Services Funding Agreement FY2021-2022 in the amount of $44,000 for the continuation of advocacy services for the homeless population in Central Florida. (2021-2948)
19. Approve the appointment of two new representatives, Shannon Young and Ann Funk, to the Committee on Aging, in accordance with the guidelines established by Administrative Code Section 4.6. (2021-2954)
20. Approve and authorize the Chairman to execute the Aspire Health Partners Homelessness Partnership Agreement FY2021-2022 in the amount of $152,420 to continue providing services for Seminole County’s chronically homeless population. (2021-2958)
Community Development
21. Approve and authorize the Chairman to execute the HOME ARP Grant Agreement with HUD in the amount of $3,046,438 to provide services for the homeless and vulnerable populations in Seminole County. (2021-2957)
Development Services
Planning and Development
22. Authorize release of Maintenance Bond #1158163 in the amount of $7,518.00 for public streets, curbs, and storm drains in relation to the Lake Mary Kinder Care; EIG14T RCCC 200 FL-Lake Mary, LLC. (2021-3003)
23. Authorize the Chairman to execute a Satisfaction of Lien in the amount of $1,451.43 associated with the property located at 387 Menashe Ct. Longwood, filed against Danny J. West. (2021-2909)
24. Authorize release of Maintenance Bond #OFL5420130 for right-of-way utilization in the amount of $2,046.50 for Spring Tree Village Apartments Phase Two; Spring Tree Village Apartments II, LLC. (2021-2944)
Environmental Services
Solid Waste Management
25. Approve and authorize the Chairman to execute a Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity for Perma-Fix of Florida, Inc., effective from October 1, 2021 through September 30, 2022. (2021-2864)
Leisure Services
Greenways and Natural Lands
26. Accept the 2021 Trails Master Plan Update as a working document for use in the future planning of capital and operational projects to meet current and future County needs. (2021-2959)
Public Works
Engineering
27. Approve and authorize the Chairman to execute the Seminole County/MetroPlan Orlando (Urban Area Metropolitan Planning Organization) FY 2021-2022 Funding Agreement in the amount of $184,816.00. (2021-2873)
Resource Management
Budget
28. Approve and authorize the Chairman to execute a Grant Agreement (Contract #LH828) with the Florida Department of Children and Families in acceptance of $1,200,000 over a three-year period (FY2022-FY2024) though the Criminal Justice, Mental Health, and Substance Abuse Reinvestment Grant Program. (2021-2953)
29. Approve appropriate Resolution #2021-R-147 implementing Budget Amendment Request (BAR) #21-094 through the General Fund in the amount of $89,750 from reserves to fund construction of a new ADA restroom facility at Winwood Park (CIP#02004012). (2021-2960)
Purchasing and Contracts
30. Waive the procurement process and award a Single Source Agreement SS-604153-21/TKH, Medical Director Services, to Todd M. Husty, D.O., P.A., Oviedo, at the fixed fee amount of $469,684.00 annually; and authorize the Purchasing and Contracts Division to execute the Agreement. (2021-2690)
31. Waive the procurement process and authorize Sole Source Procurement SS-604211-21/TLR, Water Leak Remote Sensing, with Utilis Inc., dba Asterra, San Diego, CA; and authorize Purchasing and Contracts Division to issue Purchase Orders on an as-needed basis. (2021-2956)
32. Pulled from the agenda the request to award IFB-604174-21/TKH, Term Contract for Testing and Treatment of Water Associated HVAC Systems, to SWE, Inc of Louisiana d/b/a Southwest Engineers, Inc., Slidell, LA, with the estimated annual amount of $32,600.00; and authorize the Purchasing and Contracts Division to execute the Agreement. (2021-2955)
33. Pulled for separate discussion by Commissioner Zembower.
Districts 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 voted AYE.
Consent Agenda Item #33 – 2021-2951
Vending Services Contract with Compass Group USA, Inc.
Commissioner Zembower stated in connection with the request to approve the First Amendment to RFP-603691-19/TLR, Term Contract for Vending Machine Services with Compass Group USA, Inc. d/b/a Canteen Vending Services, Clearwater, he would like to have some discussion with his fellow commissioners to allow this to go back out for rebid. This is a contract for vending that is being asked to amend for an approximate percentage increase of 10% across the board, and it is being stated it is due to rising costs. He thinks it is a wise time to go back out and resolicit the market to see if they can find a better deal or not. If not, then they will be back apparently dealing with this.
Commissioner Lockhart asked how many times they have taken this out to bid in recent years. The County Manager advised that they just considered it last year. Commissioner Lockhart noted that while she is not opposed to getting the most bang for their buck, she thinks in fact if anything, the cost may go up. Markly Jean-Charles, Purchasing and Contracts Division Manager, addressed the Board to explain they have seen some increases in their costs as contracts come up for renewal and in the RFP process. He cannot say definitively that there will be an increase next year, but it seems to be the trend currently.
Chairman Constantine asked if there is a reason the Commissioner was questioning this and Commissioner Zembower advised that when they did this with an almost identical vendor back in 2019, the vendor came back with the existing price, without a price increase. That was on their soda and liquid vending. He added if nothing else, it keeps the market honest and straight and gives others the opportunity to bid on it. If there is truly an increase, they will see that reflected in the bids. Mr. Jean-Charles noted that with these increases, it is also an increase for the gross dollars that come back to the County, and in this case, it would be 21%. Upon inquiry, Mr. Jean-Charles said there is no time sensitivity on this contract.
Commissioner Lockhart questioned for clarification how many people bid on this particular contract when it went out to bid this time. Mr. Jean-Charles explained this did not go out to bid; they are just requesting to extend this contract. Commissioner Lockhart confirmed that this is the one from last year that they just put out to bid. She advised for the public who are not seeing the agenda details that instead of paying $1.00 for a can of soda in the vending machine, they will be paying $1.10. Commissioner Herr noted that is not the taxpayer but the employees who will be paying that. Commissioner Zembower stated, to be clear, they are in County-owned facilities so it would not affect just employees.
Commissioner Herr opined there is staff time and work and costs involved with taking something out to market, so she is not in support of putting it out to bid again.
With regard to public participation, no one spoke in support or opposition, and public input was closed.
Motion by Commissioner Zembower, seconded by Commissioner Dallari, to rebid the contract and not approve the amendment on this agenda.
Districts 1, 2, and 3 voted AYE.
District 4 and 5 voted NAY.
Motion passes 3 to 2.
REGULAR AGENDA
Agenda Item #34 – 2021-2973
Redistricting – Review of County Commission Redistricting
Proposed Options to Advance for Formal Consideration in the Future
Meloney Koontz, Assistant County Manager, addressed the Board stating this is a review of the redistricting proposed options to advance for formal consideration at a future BCC meeting.
Ms. Koontz stated the redistricting process begins with the 2020 Census. On March 12, 2020, the Census Bureau began mailing out notices inviting households to, for the first time, respond online. The original response due date was July 31, 2020, and due to the COVID-19 pandemic, it was delayed until October 16, 2020. Seminole County residents played a leading role in achieving first place among Florida’s 67 counties in self-responding. The response rate in Seminole County was 73.6% compared to the nationwide average of 67% and Florida’s rate of 63.8%. Article VIII, Section 1(e) of the Florida Constitution and Chapter 124, Florida Statutes, state that following a Centennial Census, Seminole County is required to redraw its County Commission Districts to reasonably distribute the population. The redistricting team consisted of Nicole Guillet, County Manager; Desmond Morrell, Sr. Assistant County Attorney; Melvin Barnes, GIS Manager (Geographic Information System); and Meloney herself. They worked to develop three redistricting options taking the following criteria into account: equal population; compact, not sprawling districts; contiguous districts with no portion geographically separate or apart from the rest of the district; the BCC members and School Board members had to remain in their current districts; districts follow man-made or natural boundaries such major roads, rivers, etc.; districts should follow census blocks; and no district is drawn to split or minimize the political influence of any group. She then reviewed the three options starting with number three which is what they currently have with the same district lines. Maps (2) of Option 1a were received and filed.
Ms. Koontz advised it is staff’s intention to hold a public hearing on December 14th when the Board can accept the map at that time and it will then be sent to the State.
With regard to public participation, Chairman Constantine read aloud public comment from the following: Vannee VanRiper, Donna Burns, Toby Bouckhyt, and Debbie Smith. Written Comment Forms were received and filed. Craig Wilding spoke in favor of the “citizen’s proposal” that he prepared. (A large map was displayed which is included in the presentation that followed.) Deborah Poulalion distributed hard copies of her slide presentation along with the U.S. Department of Justice’s Guidance for Redistricting and Methods of Electing Government Bodies (received and filed.) She spoke in favor of the citizen’s proposal. Upon inquiry by Commissioner Zembower, the following responded and commented: Ms. Poulalion, Sr Assistant County Attorney Morrell, County Attorney Applegate, and County Manager Guillet. Dr. Deborah Bauer spoke as a member of the Board of Directors of the Sterling Park HOA asking the Board to support plans that keep Deer Run in District 1 and then explained the reasons why. Katrina Shadix submitted a form in support of the citizen’s proposal. No one else spoke in support or opposition, and public input was closed.
(Christina Renteria spoke via communications media technology supporting the citizen’s proposal after this item was completed. Chairman Constantine advised if she had concerns about her polling place that she should contact the Supervisor of Elections for assistance because they do redistricting of the precincts from time to time.)
Commissioner Dallari asked that staff explain the reasons why Option 1a was created. Ms. Koontz advised the main reason was due to the census blocks. The lines were jagged and it was created to keep the lines clean and it pulled them back onto the roads. She added with Option 1a, the numbers came out to be very consistent. The lowest percentage of overall population is 19.7% and the highest is 20.2%. The three districts are so close to being equal at 20%, and she opined it is amazing at how close they came.
Commissioner Zembower thanked staff for their work in this and congratulated Mr. Morrell on the recent award he received. He expressed he would like to hear from his fellow Commissioners on their thoughts on each specific proposal including the citizen’s proposal.
Commissioner Herr responded that since it is her district in question, she would be happy to address Commissioner Zembower’s inquiry first. She said first of all, regardless of where the lines are drawn, she is elected at-large and therefore she represents every member of the community. It is amazing to her that they have citizens that took on this much work and she very much appreciates the fact that they are as engaged as they are and as well-informed as they are. From her perspective, they do have to rule based on the conditions of today. That is the directive and that makes the most sense to her. She added they have significant investment in the Midway area and she has carried the torch on that loud and clear. She is committed to every member of the community to represent them to the best of her ability and certainly to make sure that any minority community that she represents is as advantaged as it can be to change the trajectory of children’s lives. She will be supporting Option 1a with the notion that she needs to follow the rules as they are today, and not as they may be anticipated in the future.
Commissioner Dallari also thanked County staff and the citizens for their proposal with the option of keeping the cities together. He agreed they are elected at-large and it is important that they look at this holistically. He opined that cities do annex property from the County on a regular basis, so because of that, even after they make this decision, eventually it will change. He wants to keep things consistent and keep each district as fair as possible, not just from social demographics but also from geographic demographics. He is inclined to go with Option 1a as well.
Commissioner Lockhart also commended the team and felt it was a very smooth process. She remarked that it has already been said, but because they run and represent countywide, these districts are residency requirements for county commissioners. Beyond that, she commented they all do a pretty good job of sharing the responsibility for this entire county. She can see from an operational perspective the benefit of keeping the districts as similar to the way they are now moving forward and making minor adjustments as opposed to major adjustments in one fell swoop in that there are a lot of operational things that they have aligned in this county based on the district. For example, district roads crews are in their individual district. So, they would have to ask the County Manager to completely change that operational practice or they would have entire teams of employees who are going to need to start learning a new region of the county. That is not on the list of items to consider, but just from a practical standpoint when she looks at this, she is looking at it not just from making sure that they are doing what is legally required of them, but also what is the least disruptive to the operations of this organization. She added she thinks Option 1a is the map that has the least disruption.
Chairman Constantine remarked just like the rest of the Board, he represents the entire county and he is districted into the southwest, but he cares just as much about the rural boundary as he does about Wekiva. Each and every one of them takes an active interest in the entire county. He thanked the citizens for their efforts and input. He noted he is also in support of Option 1a.
Commissioner Zembower expressed they are all citizens of Seminole County regardless of whether you live in incorporated or unincorporated. It was amazing to learn when the pandemic kicked off that when they did meet with all the mayors and managers, it was agreeable for everybody to be on the same page moving forward through the pandemic unlike other jurisdictions who found themselves in a situation like, by example, Lake County. Lake County had one set of guidelines and regulations for the county, but if you went into another area, there were different regulations. He thought the presentation by the citizens today was fantastic and it shows their ability to engage and invest the time. He will also support Option 1a.
Motion by Commissioner Zembower, seconded by Commissioner Lockhart, to move forward with Option 1a.
Commissioner Lockhart indicated the other component that they have not talked about is the school district. They have agreed on their own to follow the same districting that this Board adopts to be reflective of their districts. She explained there is a timing issue going forward and wondered if it were possible to have this come back at the November BCC meeting rather than waiting until December. Ms. Guillet stated they would try to accommodate that.
Ms. Guillet clarified that there were no discussions with staff prior to the options being prepared. Any discussions that staff had with Board members occurred after the options were presented. She wanted the record to reflect that no Commissioner tried to influence the proposals that were prepared by staff.
Districts 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 voted AYE.
COUNTY MANAGER AND STAFF BRIEFINGS
Agenda Item #35 – 2021-2972
Deer Run/Wekiva Golf Course (MSBU)
Rick Durr, Leisure Services Director, presented the Deer Run/Wekiva Golf Course Update (received and filed). He reminded the Board that on July 27th, staff walked them through the balance of the due diligence process in accordance with the process the Board had approved in evaluating these kinds of opportunities. He noted they went through Items 2 through 11 on the Due Diligence Process Summary in some detail. In regard to Item 1, the MSBU Process for Community Financial Engagement, the Board gave direction to proceed forward in working with the Deer Run residents to at least launch the petition process and gauge the degree of approval from that neighborhood fitting within their MSBU process. That process mirrored the process they did at Rolling Hills, so they used a very similar criteria for doing so. The major difference between the two is that the MSBU for Deer Run was nearly double the number of properties. He then reviewed the positive results of the MSBU petition process.
Mr. Durr indicated they need guidance from the Board to move into the acquisition phase, which is drafting the contract for the acquisition of the Deer Run property and the Wekiva Golf Club. They will need to bring the contract back before the Board for final approval and for approval of the financial needs, the transfer of funds for the acquisition of the property, which is still set at $14 million for the two properties, as well as establishing the operating budget. The operating budgets would include maintenance of the Deer Run property and the operational budget required for the golf course.
Mr. Durr advised that when the properties change hands, the County would operate it from day one as an operable golf course. They have rough numbers currently and will be finalizing those to bring them back before the Board. They will also be providing at that time the anticipated revenue from the operation of the golf course. So, they are now going through the process to establish an Enterprise Fund for both the operation of the golf course as well as being able to accept the revenue from that operation. They will also be bringing forward at a future meeting date the formal adoption of the MSBU for the Deer Run neighborhood.
Commissioner Dallari thanked Mr. Durr, county staff, and in particular, all the citizens of Deer Run for their hard work.
Motion by Commissioner Herr, seconded by Commissioner Zembower, to approve (1) proceeding with the contract for acquisition of the Deer Run property and the Wekiva Golf Club, (2) coming back to the BCC for approval of a Budget Amendment Request for the funding of the acquisition and to establish operating budgets, and (3) coming back to the BCC for formal adoption of an MSBU (Municipal Services Benefit Unit) for Deer Run.
With regard to public participation, Chairman Constantine advised he has one Written Comment Form (received and filed) in support of the golf course acquisition from Christine Landry. The following spoke in support: Dr. Deborah Bauer, Robert O’Shea, Rich Hall (President of Wekiva HOA), Chuck Burt, Randall Stowell, Katrina Shadix (Director of Bear Warriors United), Marsha DeBroske, and Larry Skinner. Cindy Haller and Nancy Harmon submitted Comment Forms in support. No one else spoke in support or opposition, and public input was closed. Public Comment Forms were received and filed.
Commissioner Dallari thanked the residents, the property owners and many in County staff. He noted that Seminole County had not purchased urban park lands for several decades and the last urban park lands they bought of significant size was Red Bug Lake Park. He opined this is off the charts because this is not just putting a stake in the ground saying that they care about their community and county, but it is part of Florida’s Natural Choice. He believes they should all be commended and this will be remembered for generations to come. This is protecting open space, wildlife, the resources under the ground, and it goes on and on.
Chairman Constantine stated in the last three years, this Commission has approved the purchase of urban park land with Rolling Hills, and now with this motion, they are moving forward with Deer Run Golf Course and Wekiva Golf Course, so he thinks they are committed to doing the things that their citizens want and that they will continue to be at the forefront of Florida’s Natural Choice.
Districts 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 voted AYE.
Commissioner Herr noted that it was said by a member of the public that this was being put into permanent conservation, and she would like the record to reflect what is happening and what is not happening, because they often get held to public comment when that may or may not be accurate. Ms. Guillet explained with respect to Deer Run, the intention is to move forward with a regional park, similar to what they did with Rolling Hills. Right now with Wekiva, the plan in the immediate future is to continue to operate it as a golf course. Any change to that would come back to the Board for discussion.
--------
Chairman Constantine recessed the meeting at 3:13 p.m.; reconvening at 3:25 p.m. with all Commissioners and all other Officials, with the exception of Deputy Clerk Terri Porter who was replaced by Deputy Clerk Kyla Farrell, who were present at the Opening Session.
COUNTY ATTORNEY’S BRIEFING
Bond Counsel Contract
Bryant Applegate, County Attorney, reminded the Board that John Stokes, Bond Counsel, is retiring. He stated the Board needs to approve a contract with Nelson Mullins for a five-year term with a termination for convenience clause.
Motion by Commissioner Dallari, seconded by Commissioner Zembower, to approve the Bond Counsel Contract with Nelson Mullins.
With regard to public participation, no one spoke in support or opposition, and public input was closed.
Districts 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 voted AYE.
County Manager Transition Program
Commissioner Zembower announced this item is not noticed on the agenda, and confirmed with Mr. Applegate that they can continue because it was openly discussed at the last meeting that the item would be brought up at this meeting. Mr. Applegate added it is a priority, and they need to move forward on this as rapidly as possible.
Mr. Applegate stated Ms. Guillet announced on September 22, 2021, her resignation as County Manager effective December 4, 2021. The Board directed the County Manager and the County Attorney’s Office to prepare a set of options for a transition plan (received and filed) for County operations. The plan consists of three parts: the appointment of the Interim County Manager, the selection process for a permanent County Manager, and the transition period. The overriding goals of the transition strategy include maintaining continuity of service to the community and providing stability within the organization.
1. Appointment of an Interim County Manager
Mr. Applegate stated ideally this appointment should occur prior to the departure of Ms. Guillet. At that point in time, it allows for sufficient hand off on the initiatives and polices of this government. The critical responsibilities of the Interim County Manager will be to provide organizational continuity and stability. The Interim County Manager should be prepared to manage any new initiatives as directed by the BCC.
The options are as follows:
Selection of a member of the County Manager’s staff. This is the traditional method as it provides significant opportunity for continuity of operations and stability for the workforce.
Selection of the County Attorney. Other jurisdictions have done this in the past.
Selection of a third-party from a professional, public management association. This approach offers similar advantages to those associated with the County Attorney but without the benefit of familiarity of internal operations.
Mr. Applegate advised the recommended action by the BCC is to select an individual to serve as Interim County Manager during the intervening period between when the current County Manager leaves her duties and when a permanent replacement is selected.
Upon Commissioner Zembower’s request, Mr. Applegate discussed maintaining continuity and stability within the organization. Ms. Guillet explained until the Board decides who is going to sit permanently in the County Manager’s Office, the concern is having a lot of changes occur with an interim and then having a lot of changes occur with the new permanent. Everybody agrees that the interim period is really a period of maintaining stability and continuity of services; not to suggest that if the Board thinks that there needs to be adjustments, there shouldn’t be adjustments.
Motion by Commissioner Dallari, seconded by Commissioner Herr, to select Option A of Item 1 and appoint Joe Abel, Deputy County Manager, as Interim County Manager; and follow the “Transition of Management Authority to the Interim County Manager” plan in its entirety as outlined in Item 3 of Mr. Applegate’s document.
Under discussion, Commissioner Herr clarified the transition follows as recommended: that there is a side-by-side approach from now through November 13, 2021; as of November 13, 2021, Joe Abel is the Interim County Manager; the side-by-side continues to happen as-needed; and Ms. Guillet works through December 3, 2021. Commissioner Herr noted the discussion around stability concerns her because she doesn’t think they’re trying to manage from the dais; and she thinks the only thing worse than change is the fear of change. She assured the employees that the Board will do everything it can to make this as easy as possible for staff. Discussion ensued.
Districts 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 voted AYE.
2. Selection of a Permanent County Manager
Mr. Applegate referenced his document and discussed the Board’s options for selecting a permanent County Manager.
The options are as follows:
Promote from within the County Manager’s staff without initiation of a search. This option is the least time-consuming and least costly of all of the options.
Conduct an internally administered search. This method requires significant staff resources and frequently employs a Board-appointed committee to vet and recommend candidates.
Retain the services of a professional executive search firm to conduct the search. These firms typically handle all of the steps involved in recruitment, beginning with the discussions related to the BCC’s “ideal candidate” through facilitation of a final offer and assisting with contract negotiations on behalf of the BCC. The fees for this service can be high and are frequently a percentage of the anticipated salary of the position.
Utilize the recruitment services of a professional public management association such as the ICMA/FCCMA Range Rider Program. These services frequently mirror those of an executive search firm.
Commissioner Lockhart stated they’ve all had a variety of experiences performing searches, and public searches are a unique animal due to the Sunshine Law. She recommends the Board use a firm. The procurement process for the firm can be a lengthy process. She would like the Board to consider looking at the Range Rider Program. She has also been part of an internal search and has seen the extreme negatives.
Commissioner Zembower stated he would support what Commissioner Lockhart referred to in general. He would support Option C (retain the services of a professional executive search firm to conduct the search) with the caveat that they consider having that occur and then have the Range Riders help vet the short list. He would not prefer the Range Riders be involved from the beginning because many times they will advocate for their own.
Commissioner Dallari stated it is imperative that they do a national search. He’s never heard of using the Range Riders to do the vetting. Discussion ensued. Commissioner Herr stated she thinks they need to do a search that is led by somebody other than their own organization; it also provides the opportunity for exceptionally qualified candidates who may not want to raise their names publicly to come forward in a way that will broaden the pool, which is the goal.
Chairman Constantine stated the people of Seminole County deserve a national search. Once the individuals come in, if at that point they felt that they needed to have outside discussion and expertise, maybe that would be the point they bring in the Range Riders. Frankly, he thinks it might be helpful at that point if they feel they need to do it; but he doesn’t want to make that decision now. The decision he thinks the Board wants to make is Option C and to start the process as quickly as they possibly can. It is incumbent upon the Board to describe in real detail what they want as a County Manager.
Commissioner Lockhart stated from a timeline perspective, she’s heard they need to move as quickly as possible. The most recent national search firm that she’s worked with did an exceptional job. It took several months to go through the procurement process to select the firm. Then it took several months to do stakeholder interviews and working with the Board of Trustees to develop the scope of what it is they were looking for. Then they started their search. Then after having done an extensive search, they brought people in for potential interviews. It was almost a year. She wants to set expectations that this is not a fast process, and the Board agreed.
Motion by Commissioner Zembower, seconded by Commissioner Herr, to select Option C of Item 2 and retain the services of a professional executive search firm to conduct the search for the selection of a permanent County Manager.
Districts 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 voted AYE.
Mr. Applegate stated staff will begin the process and reminded it will take some time, but they’ll move forward as rapidly as possible.
PROOFS OF PUBLICATION
Motion by Commissioner Zembower, seconded by Commissioner Dallari, to authorize the filing of the proofs of publication for this meeting’s scheduled public hearings into the Official Record.
Districts 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 voted AYE.
PUBLIC HEARING – QUASI-JUDICIAL
Commissioners Dallari and Zembower submitted their ex parte communications (received and filed). Chairman Constantine inadvertently stated he had ex parte communications (email from his office stating he had no ex parte communications for today’s meeting received and filed).
Agenda Item #36 - 2021-2926
Beardall Avenue PD Major Amendment Rezone
Bryan Potts, Applicant
Joy Giles, Planning and Development, addressed the Board and presented the request as outlined in the agenda memorandum and noted staff recommends approval.
Regarding Item (3) I. of the Development Order relating to buffers and a wall, Commissioner Herr stated sometimes the 6-foot-high wall is dug down two feet so the impact is a four-foot wall instead of a six-foot wall. She wants to know if they can write the language so that it is six feet above the earth. Ms. Giles answered they can add the language so that it’s six feet above grade on the outside portion of the property line looking in.
Bryan Potts, Applicant, addressed the Board and noted he appreciates working with staff and is available for any questions. Commissioner Zembower asked Mr. Potts what kind of maintenance he would be undertaking. Mr. Potts answered it would only be light maintenance of their vehicles.
With regard to public participation, no one spoke in support or opposition, and public input was closed.
Motion by Commissioner Herr, seconded by Commissioner Zembower, to adopt Ordinance #2021-37 enacting a Rezone from PD (Planned Development) to PD (Planned Development) and approve the associated Development Order #20-20500019 and Master Plan with the language regarding the wall as discussed at this meeting for 5.94 acres, located on the west side of Beardall Avenue, approximately 500 feet north of Moores Station Road, Bryan Potts, Applicant; as described in the proof of publication.
Districts 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 voted AYE.
PUBLIC HEARINGS - LEGISLATIVE
Agenda Item #37 – 2021-0035
Comprehensive Plan Text Amendment Transmittal
Property Rights Element and Net Buildable Acres
Mary Moskowitz, Planning and Development, addressed the Board and presented the request as outlined in the agenda memorandum. This item was continued from the September 14, 2021, BCC meeting. Ms. Moskowitz added HB 59, which was passed by the Legislature this past year, gives jurisdictions two years to roll the specified four property rights elements into their Comprehensive Plan or the next Evaluation and Appraisal Report (EAR). However, there was an advisory opinion from the Department of Economic Opportunity that said the DEO would not process any land development applications or Comprehensive Plan amendment changes unless a property rights element has been established within that jurisdiction. Staff is recommending the Board transmit the Ordinance per the requirements of HB 59; and during the EAR, due December 1, 2022, staff can evaluate if any other additional amendments will be needed.
Ms. Moskowitz advised the Planning & Zoning Commission voted 6-1 to recommend that the BCC deny the transmittal of the proposed amendments to the Introduction element revising the definition of net buildable acres. Based on that discussion and discussion at this morning’s meeting, staff has proposed some additional things to consider for that definition including amending the definition using the mobility fee map to keep the current definition in the core area which is bounded by I4 and 17-92 and includes the 436 quarter-mile corridor on either side; and amend the definition to be the same in the rural area, which is the area defined as suburb within the mobility fee. Another item to consider would be to extend the definition to both the core area that is established in the mobility fee and extend it along the quarter-mile corridor along the major transportation routes in Seminole County.
With regard to public participation, Chairman Constantine announced Deanna Houston submitted a Written Public Comment Form; Nancy Harmon spoke in opposition.
After discussion, there was Board consensus to separate the Introduction Element and Property Rights Element. Commissioner Zembower asked Deputy County Attorney Paul Chipok if he feels that HB 59 should stand alone in its own documentation within the ordinance, and then the additional layers that the Board and public want to discuss could be separate. Commissioner Herr stated she does because they have to get done what has to be done. If there are additional steps that need to happen after that, then they will take additional steps; but right now, they have one conflagrated conversation that is just going to bog down progress. Mr. Chipok explained the HB 59 changes that staff has proposed are the minimum amount that is required by HB 59. If they adopt what staff has proposed, they’ve met the statutory requirement. There is also the 1000 Friends of Florida proposal which includes additional items in the property rights element beyond what is statutorily mandated. He suggested they move forward with HB 59 at this point to meet the statutory requirements; and then as part of the EAR, look at the HB 59 requirements, the FLU element, what is in the 1000 Friends of Florida proposal, and work it out as part of the EAR through an elongated public hearing process and public input. Ms. Guillet added as they consider public comment, they should keep in mind the proposed scope for the community conversation on land use that is moving forward. Those issues are really exactly the kind of things staff anticipated would be discussed as part of that process.
Public participation continued and Cindy Haller, Jane West, Joe Humphreys, George Sellery, Katrina Shadix, and David Bear spoke in opposition. Extensive discussion ensued.
Motion by Commissioner Zembower, seconded by Commissioner Lockhart, to approve the Comprehensive Plan Text Amendment Property Rights Element as presented today.
Mr. Chipok pointed out for clarification, this is the transmittal hearing so Commissioner Zembower is moving Exhibit B (Property Rights Element) for transmittal to the Department of Economic Opportunity. They’ll have a chance to review and send it back to the Board. Then at a subsequent hearing, the Board will adopt the ordinance. It is not being adopted today; it is being transmitted.
Under discussion, upon Commissioner Dallari’s inquiry, Mr. Chipok stated when the item comes back from the DEO, the Board can adopt it, adopt it with changes, or not adopt it. Chairman Constantine asked if there was Board consensus to include the Introduction element (Net Buildable Acres) in the motion to transmit, and there was not consensus to for it to be included.
Districts 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 voted AYE.
Chairman Constantine asked if any of the Commissioners have a problem with transmitting the Introduction element, and there were some concerns.
Regarding the Introduction element, Ms. Hammock stated staff is proposing an amendment to the definition of net buildable acres for the urban area based on the direction that was given by the Board at a previous work session. At that work session, staff stated they would bring it forward as part of the ordinance they were working on for the private property rights element which is why these two topics were combined. Staff is proposing to amend the definition so that it is the same definition as the rural area, and it would no longer exclude road, rights-of-way, or transmission lines. Chairman Constantine stated one of the reasons they postponed this was to ensure that this would not have any effect on future projections of growth, and that they would have plenty of land and development for that. Ms. Hammock replied based on projections, there is available land that will still meet the population projections. This will ultimately decrease density; but of course, developers do have the opportunity to request additional density.
Ms. Guillet explained if the Board was to make the revision to exclude roads, rights-of-way, and transmission lines, it will reduce the developable area of all vacant property in the county. Conceivably, they will achieve less density. What staff did a calculation on was to determine whether or not there would still be sufficient density to meet the population projections moving forward within the urban area of the county, and it was determined that there is sufficient density based on the data that staff has now and the data that they’ve been using for land use analysis. Commissioner Zembower asked Ms. Guillet to define urban area. Ms. Guillet answered it is the area of the county outside of the east rural boundary as established in the Charter.
Chairman Constantine asked if that is part of the ordinance that the Board has before them, and they are willing to send it to DEO for transmittal knowing that they can change it later, does anybody still want to go through the public hearing because they have four individuals in favor of reducing the net density. Commissioner Herr stated they saw different maps and different approaches; it went through P&Z who voted it down; now there’s alternative considerations and maps that have not been vetted. If they don’t want to have this discussion now, she is okay with tabling it which may be appropriate; but just trying to slam it through and transmit it doesn’t feel right. Chairman Constantine agreed that slamming it through would be wrong. Discussion ensued.
Commissioner Zembower requested Ms. Moskowitz to review the map that was presented during her presentation (received and filed). Ms. Hammock stated the recommendation that is included within the staff report and within the ordinance is to have the same net developable acreage in the entire county. Right now there’s two different ones; one for the urban area and one for the rural area. Staff isn’t proposing to change anything for the rural area; that would remain the same. This ordinance proposes making the definition for the urban area the same as the rural area. Ms. Moskowitz’s map was added this afternoon based on the discussion that happened during the morning meeting. Discussion ensued.
Ms. Moskowitz explained there are two options for this proposal that are being presented. The first is to use the definition that is currently in the urban area in the core area in the mobility fee. The other option is to use the definition in both the core area and along the corridors. Upon Commissioner Herr’s inquiry, Ms. Moskowitz advised the mobility fee is divided into the three districts: the core district, the two suburb districts, and the rural district. The proposal in front of the Board would be to have the definition of net buildable density, that is currently in the urban service area, only in the core area which is the area bounded by I4 and 17-92 and along the corridors identified in the Comp Plan.
Commissioner Dallari stated staff is providing another option right at this meeting. The problem he has is that the public hasn’t seen it or vetted it. They are doing this at the 12th hour. Since they can make text amendments anytime, he thinks they need to bring this back so they can have an honest discussion with the public.
Motion by Commissioner Dallari, seconded by Commissioner Zembower, to continue to the appropriate time the request to transmit Comprehensive Plan text amendments to the Introduction Element; revising the definition of Net Buildable Acres of the proposed Ordinance.
Under discussion, Commissioner Lockhart stated she was not prepared to support the element as presented for many reasons. She believes it is a great solution to having the best of both worlds. She would like the opportunity to explore it more in depth and what it may mean. There is probably public here that still wants to comment on this, so she would like to go ahead and hear their comments in case they could incorporate some of their ideas moving forward.
Chairman Constantine stated they are talking about the definition of density. All they are talking about is eliminating rights-of-way and utilities from density. Commissioner Zembower stated they owe it to the community and all of the stakeholders to spend the time to nail it down once and for all so they don’t have exceptions to development. Discussion ensued.
With regard to public participation on the Introduction element, George Sellery, Cindy Haller, and Katrina Shadix spoke; Nancy Harmon’s name was called but she was no longer present; no one else spoke and public input was closed.
Chairman Constantine reminded the motion in front of the Board is to postpone this part of the ordinance for more discussion and consideration. He asked staff if they could bring it back at the next meeting. Ms. Guillet asked what the Board is looking for when staff brings it back to the Board. Commissioner Dallari advised he doesn’t think it’s fair to the public that this was brought up at the 12th hour. No one had a chance to see it. Ms. Guillet confirmed that the Commissioner just wants the information available to the public. Commissioner Lockhart stated she would like to see a more granular, detailed map. Commissioner Herr stated she questions whether or not P&Z needs to see it before it goes back to the Board; and quite honestly, the Board needs briefings on it.
Chairman Constantine stated right now they are looking at a number of different alternatives to what the original request was which was to make it consistent all the way through. This was brought up today, and they need more clarity on all of the definitions. He concurred with receiving staff briefings. Commissioner Zembower stated after the Board gave direction to bring this back, they took up discussions about attainable housing, affordable housing, and all that not really thinking through the whole process how that would impact that discussion they had months earlier to bring this back to the Board. If they are trying to get the missing middle housing but they’re reducing density, how do they get it and where does it go. He agreed they need a briefing and asked whether or not this would have to go back to P&Z. Mr. Chipok answered if they are significantly changing the basis of the ordinance, it would be prudent to bring it back to P&Z. Commissioner Zembower stated the public needs to know where annexations are going to happen in the cities because once they’re done trying to prevent the leapfrogging that’s gone on for 20-30 years, there’s going to be a time where a city is going to annex and the County no longer has a say-so in what the density is going to be.
Districts 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 voted AYE.
Mr. Chipok asked for clarification on the motion. There were questions regarding whether or not they needed to wait for this to go back through P&Z. Mr. Chipok stated it’s not necessary to go back to P&Z because they’re looking at the language; and the Board has the ability to adopt, adopt with changes, or not adopt. Ms. Guillet advised if the goal is to accommodate missing middle housing and affordable housing, that’s not typically regulated by the definition of density; that’s regulated through land use and other definitions. What she’s hearing is that, for instance, if they went with the core area, basically what they’re doing is saying everything in the core area will get a 15% density bonus. If that’s what the Board wants, then that’s a good way to get there. But if what they’re focused on is trying to accommodate missing middle housing or affordable housing as a particular use, and that’s what they want to incentivize, she isn’t sure the net density definition is the best way to get there. Commissioner Dallari stated the right way to do it is to go back to the old definition of net density and to give them the bonus if they go to affordable housing. Chairman Constantine stated there are ways to accommodate attainable and affordable housing without just giving a carte blanche 15% increase.
Mr. Chipok stated the actions that staff will be taking is to transmit Exhibit B to the DEO for review and bring it back for an adoption hearing in the future; and Exhibit A is being continued and will be brought back to the Board at the next hearing. Ms. Guillet noted the agenda for the next meeting goes out in three days, so there may be some stuff associated with this that goes out later. Ms. Hammock advised they would need time to advertise it. Commissioner Zembower, as the seconder, asked if the motioner would be willing to amend the motion to continue the request to the November 9 BCC meeting, and the motioner agreed. For a point of clarification, Mr. Chipok stated technically since they are continuing to a date and time certain, it doesn’t need to be advertised. If it comes back to the next meeting and staff has physically not been able to reach conclusions and needs further research, the Board has the option to continue it to a date and time certain again.
Motion by Commissioner Dallari, seconded by Commissioner Zembower, for reconsideration of continuing the request to the next meeting, to continue it to the November 9, 2021, BCC meeting.
Chairman Constantine stated to make this clear, they are going to make a reconsideration of the motion.
Districts 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 voted AYE.
Motion by Commissioner Dallari, seconded by Commissioner Zembower, to continue to the November 9, 2021, BCC meeting the request to transmit Exhibit A (Comprehensive Plan text amendments to the Introduction Element); revising the definition of Net Buildable Acres of the proposed Ordinance.
Districts 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 voted AYE.
Agenda Item #38 – 2021-2963
Seminole County Code Amendment
Part 3 (Natural Lands) of Chapter 190 Parks and Recreation
Rick Durr, Leisure Services Director, addressed the Board and presented the request as outlined in the agenda memorandum. He noted this amendment will include a definition for supermajority, require a supermajority vote for the disposition or disposal of Natural Lands properties held by the County, and require a supermajority vote in order to amend or invalidate the supermajority requirement. Mr. Durr added staff recommends approval.
Chairman Constantine stated it was his understanding that this Code amendment would include all actions taken by the Natural Lands including any zoning changes or anything else. He understands they can’t make that change today because there is an ordinance in front of the Board; but he asked whether or not the Board wanted to have a supermajority both on any changes that would happen in the Natural Lands that are purchased by the citizens as well as a supermajority to change that motion. Commissioner Zembower asked to hear the attorney’s opinion because he has read through the proposed ordinance, and notwithstanding some daily operational things that were taken from the County Manager and given to the director, he believes this ordinance covers it. Chairman Constantine responded he asked that question specifically, and they said it did not which is why he is bringing it up.
Commissioner Zembower stated they changed the zoning on several parcels, and it was his understanding that was a cleanup of lands that the County had acquired that had never been properly zoned as they should be. Mr. Durr stated that is correct. He explained in December 2020, they had a revision to the zoning on the properties that required it as well as any cleanup of land uses to move those into the appropriate land use. All of those properties have now basically been scrubbed and put into alignment. Commissioner Zembower asked if there would be a need to take what’s currently zoned in Natural Lands and change the zoning. Mr. Durr answered Leisure Services would never have a reason to do that. The governing ordinance for the Natural Lands Program will remain intact on those properties as it is, and that is pretty prescriptive as to what they can and can’t do on it already. Commissioner Zembower asked what the Chairman wants added in addition to disposition. The Chairman answered any zoning and Comp Plan changes of the property.
Mr. Chipok stated at this point, the ordinance only covers disposition of the property, which means selling off the property. Chairman Constantine advised he thought the Board was more concerned about the perpetuity of the protection of the conservation, not just the sale of it. Commissioner Lockhart stated the only reason it would be rezoned is if they were planning to sell it. She stated she is fine if they want to do a supermajority to sell it and a supermajority to rezone it, but she thinks it is fine the way it is. However, she would like to do that later and get the ordinance done that is before them today. Chairman Constantine replied he agrees. It is something they can’t do today, but it is something they can direct the attorney to bring back.
Chairman Constantine advised the public may choose to waive their public comments in support with what the Board has discussed, and noted Nancy Harmon submitted a Written Public Comment Form in support. With regard to public participation, Katrina Shadix, Cindy Haller, and David Bear waived in support; Kathryn Mennella spoke in support; no one else spoke and public input was closed.
Motion by Commissioner Herr, seconded by Commissioner Lockhart, to adopt Ordinance #2021-38 amending Part 3 (Natural Lands) of Chapter 190 Parks and Recreation of the Seminole County Code Section 190.77 to add a definition for supermajority; and adding Section 190.85 Disposition of designated Natural Lands by the Board of County Commissioners; as described in the proof of publication.
Districts 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 voted AYE.
Chairman Constantine requested that they make a recommendation to establish another ordinance on all uses, land use and zoning changes, not just the disposition of the Natural Lands.
Motion by Commissioner Zembower, seconded by Commissioner Dallari, to establish an ordinance including all uses, land use and zoning changes, not just the disposition of the Natural Lands.
Districts 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 voted AYE.
COUNTY MANAGER’S REPORT
Ms. Guillet stated regarding the community conversation on land use policy, staff sent the Board a proposed scope; they would like to get moving on it as soon as possible to hopefully get the process started after the 1st of the year. She asked the Board to get with Ms. Hammock to inform her of any comments or concerns.
COUNTY ATTORNEY’S REPORT
No Report.
FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS
Annual Evaluation Process for the CAO and CMO
Commissioner Lockhart stated she just wanted to remind everyone that it is time for the annual review process for the County Manager and the County Attorney. Although the County Manager is moving on, they still need to stay on track with that process that they have committed to. They are past due at this point, and she doesn’t want the Board to get behind like they have before. Ms. Guillet asked if the Board wants to go through the same process they did last time and use Larry Ross. Discussion ensued. There was an agreement to use the same process as they did before, and find out if Mr. Ross is available.
Policy for Single-Use Plastics at County facilities
Chairman Constantine stated there is an opportunity to eliminate single-use plastics at the County’s two or three venues. He asked if there was Board consensus to direct staff to bring back a recommendation. Commissioner Zembower stated he’s happy to have the conversation. Commissioner Lockhart stated they’ve had the conversation before, and her position hasn’t changed. Chairman Constantine advised he believes the discussion was to have staff go back and bring back a proposal, but that did not eventually occur. Staff is asking for direction. He explained they only have a couple of venues; other communities with lots of venues have already done this. There are options on how to do it, and he is asking the direction of the Commission if they would agree to ask staff to evaluate and bring back a proposal regarding how they can eliminate single-use plastics and Styrofoam at County venues. Commissioner Dallari confirmed that there would be a cost analysis. Commissioner Zembower restated he’d be happy to have that discussion. Commissioner Herr stated she thinks they would be managing and governing, so she has no interest in having the discussion. Commissioner Lockhart stated she thinks it would be intellectually dishonest of her to say she agrees to the discussion when she already knows she doesn’t want to put staff through the rigamoral when she’s not on board. She doesn’t feel like micromanaging to this point.
Chairman Constantine reiterated there are other communicates that have done this with relative ease and set an example for others. If they can set an example without causing any problems in the community, then he thinks it’s incumbent upon the Board to be leaders and set an example. Commissioner Zembower repeated he’s happy to have the conversation if they get all of the data on the cost, the impact. Commissioner Herr stated she’d be happier to have it happen without a conversation.
Ms. Guillet advised staff will get the information.
Public Comment on Items Not Related to the Agenda
Katrina Shadix spoke regarding bear straps, the success of the 1st annual Black Bear Romp 5k, and a County partnership with Bear Warriors United to get discounted prices on bear resistant trash cans.
Linda Barker submitted a Speaker Comment Form but was not present when her name was called.
Speaker Forms received and filed.
COUNTY MANAGER’S REPORT CONTINUED
Ms. Guillet stated they are moving forward with all of their ARPA programs, and one of the programs is a Small Business Assistance program. They are running it the same way they did as the CARES Act programs, and there are subrecipient agreements associated with that. During the CARES Act assistance program, Tricia Johnson, Deputy County Manager, was able to sign those subrecipient agreements; and Ms. Guillet would like the Board’s authorization for Ms. Johnson to do that for these funds as well.
Motion by Commissioner Zembower, seconded by Commissioner Herr, to authorize Deputy County Manager Tricia Johnson to execute subrecipient agreements related to the ARPA programs.
Districts 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 voted AYE.
DISTRICT REPORTS
District 4
No report.
District 1
Commissioner Dallari stated he had a virtual meeting with OEP on October 5, and they interviewed the Commissioner regarding transportation issues. He found out that they were redoing the value study for all seven counties in Central Florida and was surprised they were doing it without the County knowing about it. The Commissioner asked if they brought in the Regional Planning Board because they’re doing How Did We Grow? and OEP wasn’t aware of that. There’s going to be an emphasis on Orange County because they’re going out for a transportation referendum for sales tax. He informed them that Seminole County is talking about it too as well as Osceola County. At MetroPlan Orlando, they do a transportation study every year. He was a little bit taken aback. The Commissioner’s issue is that there’s a lot of mixed messaging going on where they’re not setting the expectations correctly. He started speaking to staff regarding their contract and asked when that is coming up. Ms. Johnson addressed the Board and stated the agreement with OEP expired at the end of September. Staff is working with them to renew, but it requires a lot of research on staff’s part and discussed the process. She has a meeting with a member of OEP later this week to talk about some ROI questions that staff has. Commissioner Dallari confirmed with Ms. Johnson that they currently do not have an agreement with OEP. Discussion ensued.
District 5
No report.
District 2
Commissioner Zembower noted local events. He stated there will be a change at the Central Florida Zoo; the CEO has resigned, and there will be further discussion on the vetting process to replace the CEO.
District 3/CHAIRMAN’S REPORT
Chairman Constantine reported on his presentation of the Seminole County Legislative Delegation priorities. He met with FDOT, the City Manager, and County Manager on the future of what they’re going to do with the land that they purchased on Hattaway Drive. They are all in unison on the opportunities that they hold there. FDOT had a talk about the roundabout ascetics and a listening session on the Wekiva Parkway, and they will have a series of those going on. He discussed Tourism’s YouTube series premier. The Chairman announced the passing of John Duda, and noted local events.
COMMUNICATIONS AND/OR REPORTS
There were no communications or reports submitted.
--------
There being no further business to come before the Board, the Chairman declared the meeting adjourned at 7:15 p.m., this same date.
ATTEST:_____________________________Clerk___________________________Chairman
tp/kf