BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS

SEMINOLE COUNTY, FLORIDA

AUGUST 22, 2017

The following is a non-verbatim transcript of the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS MEETING OF SEMINOLE COUNTY, FLORIDA, held at 9:30 a.m., on Tuesday, August 22, 2017, in Room 1028 of the SEMINOLE COUNTY SERVICES BUILDING at SANFORD, FLORIDA, the usual place of meeting of said Board.

Present:

Chairman John Horan (District 2)

Vice Chairman Brenda Carey (District 5)

Commissioner Robert Dallari (District 1)

Commissioner Lee Constantine (District 3)

Commissioner Carlton Henley (District 4)

County Manager Nicole Guillet

Deputy County Attorney Lynn Porter-Carlton

Deputy Clerk Jane Spencer

Reverend Daniel Smith, Holy Cross Episcopal Church in Sanford, gave the Invocation. Commissioner Dallari led the Pledge of Allegiance.

BUSINESS SPOTLIGHT

The Business Spotlight video for Chocolate Compass was presented.

AWARDS AND PRESENTATIONS

Agenda Item #1 – 2017-0248

Motion by Commissioner Constantine, seconded by Commissioner Henley, to adopt appropriate Resolution #2017-R-134 recognizing the following companies as award recipients at the Seminole County Regional Chamber of Commerce Seminole Business Awards Luncheon on August 25, 2017, and for their capital investment and job creation within Seminole County: DCS Commercial Cleaning, evok Advertising, Inc., Findsome & Winmore, Florida Blue, Heathrow Women's Club Charities, IMPOWER, Insight Credit Union, School Partnerships, and Vose Law Firm, LLP.

Districts 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 voted AYE.

Ray Villegas, Chief Operating Officer of Seminole Regional Chamber of Commerce, accepted the Resolution and thanked the Board on behalf of the Chamber’s Board of Directors, their members, and specifically their award winners. Mr. Villegas stated it is great for the award winners to be recognized for the contributions they make to Seminole County and the business community as a whole.

-------

Agenda Item #2 - no number

Chairman Horan explained that the Seminole Action Board (SAB) is a group of business people who have been performing and executing the County’s homelessness initiative for the last year. The Chairman stated this presentation will be their one-year report.

John Hillenmeyer, Chairman of the Seminole Action Board, addressed the Board to report that he is very proud of the work the group has done and the outcomes they have achieved. The group has not resolved homelessness in Central Florida but they have made great progress. Mr. Hillenmeyer then thanked the Commissioners, who authorized and empowered a group of people to come together and address what was felt to be a serious problem in Central Florida.

Mr. Hillenmeyer began a PowerPoint presentation entitled “Seminole Community Action Strategy - An Approach to Impact and Reduce Homelessness in Seminole County One-Year Review” and displayed the Seminole Action Board slide. He then discussed past strategies and how the SAB was formed. Mr. Hillenmeyer reiterated his thanks to each Commissioner for their support and emphasized that the SAB would not have gotten anything done without the Commissioners’ help.

Mr. Hillenmeyer introduced the SAB members in the audience. He specifically acknowledged Wendy Brandon, Valmarie Turner, Nicole Guillet, and Dawn Kraus. He explained that the volunteers provide different perspectives other than just a social service view and pointed out that Philip Mangano, SAB Advisor, has proved that you can have a compassionate big heart, use business principles, and get better results than great hearts alone cannot pull off.

Mr. Hillenmeyer displayed and reviewed the list of Partner Agencies. He specifically acknowledged Aspire, Health Care Center for the Homeless, Community Based Care of Central Florida, Pathways Home, Goodwill, the Seminole County Housing Authority, Seminole County Public Schools Foundation, Seminole County Sheriff’s Office, Wendover Development, Heart to Heart, and Northland Church. Mr. Hillenmeyer stated SAB believes in supporting a regional agenda of strategies but stressed that they firmly believe that solving this problem takes local initiatives and local leadership because every place is not the same.

Mr. Hillenmeyer stated that Mr. Mangano has been their advisor and facilitator and is a national resource in homelessness. He briefly reviewed Mr. Mangano’s eight-year tenure in the Bush administration and pointed out that Mr. Mangano believes very deeply in the social justice of helping the homeless and those in need but does it through a business framework and can prove that can and does work well.

Philip Mangano, CEO of American Round Table to Abolish Homelessness, addressed the Board and continued the presentation. Mr. Mangano thanked the Commissioners for their cooperation and support because without that, they would not have gotten the job done. He reported that when he was in Washington and they did an analysis of the cities and counties that were doing the best work regarding homelessness in communities, that is actually reducing the number of homeless people in communities, the number one correlative in getting the job done was the political will of the jurisdictional CEOs in those communities.

Mr. Mangano explained how the SAB has moved from process to performance, from inputs to outcomes, and from anecdote and conjecture to data and research. He talked about how critical the partners have been in the work that they have done and how the SAB’s business approach has made a significant difference. Mr. Mangano recognized Reverend Joel Hunter for his ministry of inclusivity, which has been spiritually inspirational to the group. He mentioned the new entity that Reverend Hunter and his team have created, Community Resource Network. Mr. Mangano recognized Pathways to Care, Pathways to Housing, and Pathway Homes. He talked about the Foundation for Seminole Public Schools and the investments of resources they have made over time that came in when they called for performance and outcomes. That has been a template for some of the work that has been done by the larger group. He acknowledged the School System and their social workers who went out into the hotels and motels and visited people in cars and identified people so they could be moved along.

Mr. Mangano recognized one of the newest members, Jonathan Wolf with Wendover Housing, and stated they have brought to the table a key developer in the county in terms of a renewed commitment on Wendover Housing’s part to create housing specifically targeted to homeless people. Mr. Mangano explained that one of the central impediments to getting the job done is units. They have the social service resources but they need more units.

Mr. Mangano reported that the Seminole Action Board is about to inaugurate a performance prize for meritorious achievement among nonprofits who get the job done and produce outcomes and results. He added that the intent is to name that prize the Hillenmeyer Award of Performance to acknowledge the great work that Mr. Hillenmeyer has done in leading this group. Mr. Mangano discussed investments made by the County and how SAB looks to leverage that investment. He noted that part of the leveraging is in the Seminole Action Opportunity Fund. Mr. Mangano explained that the SAB focused on accountability, action, and specifically on performance; did they make a difference in the lives of their homeless neighbors. He pointed out that if all of their meetings, all of their conversations, all of their angst on this issue did not bring remedy to those individuals (to those mothers, fathers, and especially children), then their efforts are hollow. They are just do‑gooders who leave their poorest neighbors in their long misery.

Mr. Mangano displayed the Year One Strategy slide and advised that the Year One Strategy was quantifiable, not nebulous. He then reviewed the four strategies. With regard to Homeless Individuals, the goal was to end the homelessness of the 50 most vulnerable and disabled individuals in Seminole County; and the Result was 117 individuals were placed in housing during the first year of the initiative. With regard to Homeless Families, the goal was to end the homelessness of the 120 most vulnerable families in Seminole County; and the Result was 142 families were placed in housing. Mr. Mangano then talked about the partnerships that were vital to these achievements. He stated the intent was to end the homelessness of 400 of their homeless neighbors, and they actually ended the homelessness of 500 people who didn't have a place to stay, didn't have a place to live in, and didn't have a home. With regard to Investment and Leveraging, Mr. Mangano reported they leveraged more than $2 million from federal and philanthropic resources over the course of the year. He emphasized that is $2 million that came into the county by virtue of strategic investments authorized by the BCC and carried out by the County Manager.

The Year One Outcomes slide was displayed and summarized. With regard to the View to the Future slide, Mr. Mangano reviewed the five listed recommendations for Seminole County. Mr. Mangano added a sixth recommendation. He pointed out that in their work with homeless families, they recognize that many families who are vulnerable, on the edge, and on the margins are living in hotels and motels. He believes one of their commitments as a community is to engage the owners of those hotels and motels and try to work with them. They are providing an important resource. Those families, if they weren't in those motels, as egregious as the overcrowding might be, might be on the streets in their cars. They should engage the owners of those hotels in a collaborative way to figure out how to work together to either make those more habitable for the families or figure out different ways to reconfigure.

Mr. Mangano discussed the Dashboard and Accountability Committee and stressed they are not interested in conjecture and anecdote. With regard to how many people were housed, the committee had to go through a lot of meanderings to get to the numbers but they are certain of those numbers. He acknowledged the great work that Valmarie Turner and the people at Community Services have done as the committee has agonized over what the correct numbers are. Mr. Mangano stated one of the primary intents in the next year for the Dashboard and Accountability Committee is to determine the number of homeless people in Seminole County. He pointed out that with every source they go to, they get different numbers. They are going to take that on themselves and come up with the best number that they can. Mr. Mangano reviewed the second task, which is to apply methodology and due diligence to what is reported to determine what the actual number is. He displayed the Special Thanks slide and recognized Captain Dan Purcell, with the Sheriff’s Office, and Anthony Raimondo, Deputy Chief of Police in Sanford, for the good work they are doing in terms of identifying people who are on the streets.

Commissioner Carey referred to Mr. Mangano's comments about the delay in getting data and pointed out that they have talked about the HSN system for a long time; how the data goes in, how they get data, and some of the impediments to that. She questioned whether Mr. Mangano has a solution to how they can change the way they get the data. Mr. Mangano stated when they interacted with HSN over the course of the last year, he thinks they have become much more amenable in providing data as best they can. The difficulty is that in serving multiple jurisdictions with a limited staff, they are unable. It is not through some kind of “mal intent,” but they just don't have the resources to provide the data that is needed. Mr. Mangano explained that because they are organized around business principles and practices, SAB deems that data to be critical in terms of creating policy and making investments. He added that the idea of having immediate access to data is critical in any business field.

Mr. Mangano advised that the Dashboard team has had multiple conversations and they have visited HSN. They were told as recently as a couple weeks ago when they were making simple requests for data that the request will be put in the queue and they cannot tell them when they will be able to get that information. He does not believe it is through “mal intent.” SAB just has a different frame for how they are coming to the issue. It is not simply good intention, well‑meaning programs, and humanitarian gestures. It is data, performance, and outcome. He stressed it is not the frame that HSN is used to.

Commissioner Carey reminded everyone that they have talked over several years now about the ability for all of the partners to be able to put data in and get data out. If they are entrusting a group to take on the homelessness issue and have people that are authorized to access that data, it should not only be to put the data in but to be able to get the data that they need out. That is the key and it solves their problem as well. They wouldn’t have everybody backed up if they would allow the partners to have access to it. She advised the BCC is providing funding there so they certainly ought to be able to have access. She does not understand why that is so difficult. Mr. Mangano responded that over the last year, the Dashboard Committee and the SAB Board in general have come to the conclusion that they need to collect the data and have it available internally in an IT system in Seminole County so that when they need a piece of data, they can go to their own system, achieve that data, and then make adjustments to policy and investment as is necessary. He believes the best way to do that is to take that data internally. There are many episodes and there are people in the audience that could talk about the difficulty of getting data. He emphasized again that it is not through “mal intent”; but for one reason or another, they can't get that done for SAB, and SAB needs to do it themselves.

Commissioner Carey invited Shelley Lauten to come forward to discuss this. The Commissioner remarked that this has been one of the frustrating pieces of this puzzle all along. They have talked about using a different system. Ms. Lauten reported there was about a $1 million investment made in the HSN system. They have been working to make it open‑sourced. Hopefully by the fall, they should have a system where everybody who has got access can pull their own data. It is the most important thing that they have to be doing. Ms. Lauten reported that the second issue, which she thinks is critically important, is that every time she came into a meeting, there was another data source; and they don't connect. They are not finding duplication of effort. They are not seeing what is not in HSN, which is a big portion, the people who are not using HSN like the churches for example.

Ms. Lauten stated they just got authorized at the commission to move forward and they are going to use Seminole County as their pilot (because Seminole is further along) to look for a way to connect HSN, the Community Resource Network (which is the faith community), the wonderful Sheriff's Department, and the Library system. She noted there are all of these great data sources and they are all running parallel. Ms. Lauten reiterated that they have a pilot program that they hope to start in September to see how they can "de‑dupe" the data and get some comprehensive data so they can start to know how many homeless people they actually have. Mr. Mangano added that even if they had direct access to HSN's data, one of the things they discovered in trying to come up with the numbers that were presented here today is that they could give them about 50% of what was reported because certain programs and certain initiatives are not within the Homeless Management Information System, which is another reason why he feels strongly that it would be important for Seminole County to maintain its own data system so that they have the collection of data. He stated they have groups that meet regularly and that is how they achieved these numbers for today, not simply by going through HSN.

Mr. Hillenmeyer agreed that HSN has improved its performance. He noted that the problem is that HSN is basically the TSA of HUD money so they are accountable to HUD. He believes that is a big problem because SAB is trying to deal with the whole issue. A lot of the stuff is outside of what HUD defines as homeless and basically they don't deal with it. He stated that SAB is trying to deal with populations that fall together. Mr. Hillenmeyer explained that getting the count they got for the presentation took a lot of work to track down but now they really have the real numbers and know by person who was helped. Commissioner Carey advised that HUD has made some adjustments in their rules and how the money is going to be distributed. She knows that conversation is still going on. The Commissioner stated she thinks they need to really organize a strong lobby for the feds so they understand what needs to be changed in HUD to allow communities like theirs to do what they feel is best with their HUD dollars; and HUD cannot continue to say, "Well, it is this much for this program and you can't qualify for that program." She talked about why they need flexibility and then advised that the Board will do everything they can to help and she is available to help in any way that she can. Commissioner Carey thanked Mr. Mangano and his group for all that they have done.

Commissioner Dallari thanked Mr. Mangano for his presentation and thanked everyone present for being a part of this project and trying to help end homelessness. The Commissioner stated that what makes Seminole County unique is that time after time the business community steps up; and he thanked them for taking the time, not just out of their personal time but also out of their business, and stepping up and making a difference. He referred to the pilot program that Mr. Mangano and Ms. Lauten were discussing and stated he believes that is what will stop the silo effect. Once that pilot program is up and running, they can then take that model and tell HUD this is the right way to do it. These are the things that the citizens of Seminole County and the business people expect of government. Since the pilot program starts sometime in the fall, Commissioner Dallari wondered if there is an estimate of how long it will take to put the pilot program together and see actual results. Ms. Lauten reported that one of the issues that they are already running into is that some people move at a different pace of change than others and some organizations change at a different pace than others. She stated that is why she actually wanted to start in Seminole County because she believes there are more organizations than not who want to see this change. Ms. Lauten stated she has to understand, and the partners have to understand, the data sources and how they can get them to link, which is more technical than she has the knowledge right now. She thinks they can do that and is hoping that in six months they will have a good sense of how to connect. Commissioner Dallari confirmed with Ms. Lauten that she believes within six months to a year, she will have a good sense of how the pilot program is actually working. Commissioner Dallari then asked how the Board can help in achieving the goals. Ms. Lauten responded that when she puts the group together, she will need the Board’s help in making sure they stay together and stay at the table. They will first identify the barriers for coming together and will come back to the Board if they are running into ways that people can't remove or don't want to remove those barriers. She knows CRN and HMIS were built by the same company. Ms. Lauten emphasized that the Community Resource Network is going to be a piece that is going to help the community like no other community in helping the families especially move out of homelessness. If they can get that up and running and connect that into HMIS, it will allow them to have the limited data that is coming into HMIS to be enriched. There are over 1,400 places of worship in the three counties. She suggested they imagine the power of connecting the data from all the people that the faith community sees at their doorstep, which half of them are not going into HMIS. They will have such a robust idea of who the families are especially and how they are being served. She pointed out that it is a huge piece and believes if they get those two connected, they will go a long way in solving this issue.

Commissioner Dallari asked Ms. Lauten to please let all five of the Commissioners know if there are any obstacles or boundaries that she needs help with. He again thanked the volunteers and the business sector for being a part of this. Ms. Guillet thanked the entire Seminole Action Board and acknowledged that it is wonderful having a partnership with the SAB. They have a very strong voice with the SAB and with Mr. Mangano. Ms. Guillet talked about the effectiveness of the group and pointed out that the data issue and bridging the gap for things like utilities have been an ongoing issue for over 12 years, and they have been able to resolve that on a Seminole County level because of the efforts of the SAB in a year. She believes that speaks volumes of how effective and how valuable and how important this group is to the community. Commissioner Carey talked about the "Ten to End" commitment, which was an effort that was started a number of years ago. Ms. Lauten underscored what Mr. Mangano said earlier, that the regional framework is important but the work gets done at the local level. She believes Seminole County is a great example. The County has taken it, owned it, and still abides by the regional strategies.

Chairman Horan thanked all of the Seminole Action Board members for the tremendous work that they have done and the tremendous results they have gotten. The Chairman talked about the need for a partnership with many different types of providers to do this. He advised that the problem they are having is that the regional approach, which is tied into HUD's approach, has a tendency to measure outputs not outcomes. The way the SAB has basically carved through all of this data and identified other sources of data and come up with really good strategies, because they have good data, is the kind of thing that one would expect business people to do. When the Board handed this off to business people and Seminole leadership came in, he knew they did the right thing. The Chairman complimented the SAB, Ms. Lauten, and Mr. Mangano for the great work they have done in trying to bring in all of the various regional partners together. Chairman Horan suggested that if anyone wants to contribute, they can go to the Central Florida Foundation and go to the drop‑down box where it says Seminole Action Opportunity Fund.

Commissioner Henley remarked that, as has been stated several times by Commissioner Carey and others, many efforts have happened over the years. The situation they find themselves in did not happen overnight and will not be solved overnight. The Commissioner stated he sees faces out in the audience that were not there years ago when other efforts were made. He encouraged each of them, as the Good Book does, to not grow weary of doing good because this is something that will take a long time. Commissioner Henley stated he appreciates very much those who have committed to resolve this situation. He believes it is something that can be solved as long as they are determined and stay committed.

Commissioner Carey requested that they put this report on the front page of their website and also a link for people that do want to make a contribution to make it as easy as possible since they leveraged those dollars between the investment that the County made and the contributions that private individuals through philanthropy gave to over $2 million just in this past year.

-------

Chairman Horan recessed the meeting at 10:47 a.m., and reconvened at 10:54 a.m.

COUNTY MANAGER’S CONSENT AGENDA

With regard to public participation, no one in the audience spoke in support or in opposition to the Consent Agenda and public input was closed.

Motion by Commissioner Carey, seconded by Commissioner Henley, to authorize and approve the following:

County Manager’s Office

Office of Emergency Management

3. Approve and authorize the Chairman to execute Memorandum of Understanding between Seminole County and The Sharing Center for support with donations collection, distribution, and management during times of disaster. (2017-0213)

4. Approve and authorize the Chairman to execute appropriate Resolution #2017-R-135 to adopt the County's Comprehensive Emergency Management Plan, as required by Florida Statute 252.  Once adopted, this plan will serve as the guidance document for all disaster response in all municipalities of, and unincorporated areas of, Seminole County. (2017-0257)

5. Approve and authorize the Chief Administrator of the Office of Emergency Management to execute a Memorandum of Understanding between the American Red Cross and Seminole County to provide emergency shelter support during disasters. (2017-0258)

Community Services

Community Development Division

6. Approve and accept the Neighborhood Stabilization Program Snapshot/Report pursuant to Seminole County Resolution No. 2013-R-61. (2017-0249)

Development Services

Planning & Development Division

7. Adopt appropriate Resolution #2017-R-136 vacating and abandoning a platted five-foot Utility Easement on Lot 17, Silver Lakes East at the Crossings Unit One, as recorded in the Public Records of Seminole County, Florida in Plat Book 35, Pages 15-16, more particularly known as 818 Silk Oak Terrace; Martin P. Winger, Applicant. (2017-0217)

8. Approve the plat for the Brookmore Estates Phase I Subdivision containing thirty-six (36) lots on 14.36 acres zoned PD (Planned Development), located on the north side of Chapman Road, approximately 4,000 feet west of Alafaya Trail; Chad Moorhead, Applicant. (2017-0215)

Public Works

Engineering Division

9. Approve and authorize the Chairman to execute an Acceptance by Seminole County of Amendment to Sidewalk Easement necessary for Hillview Drive. (2017-0263)

10. Approve and authorize the Chairman to execute a Second Amendment to an Interlocal Agreement between Seminole County and the City of Altamonte Springs relating to the Road Transfer of Lake Avenue. (2017-0233)

Facilities

11. Approve and authorize the Chairman to execute Final Renewal and Second Amendment to Lease Agreement for State of Florida Department of Law Enforcement Secondary Computer Data Storage Site; State Lease Number 710:0236. (2017-0178)

12. Approve and authorize the Chairman to execute the Final Renewal to the Wilshire Plaza, Phase II Lease. (2017-0202)

Resource Management

Budget & Fiscal Management

13. Approve and authorize the Chairman to execute appropriate Resolution #2017-R-137 implementing Budget Amendment Request (BAR) #17-084 through the 2014 Infrastructure Sales Tax Fund in the amount of $315,181 from reserves for additional construction and CEI Services funding for the Black Hammock Salt Creek Culvert Project. (2017-0250)

14. Approve and authorize the Chairman to execute appropriate Resolution #2017-R-138 implementing the Budget Amendment Request (BAR) #17-085 through the Municipal Services Benefit Unit (MSBU) Program Fund to transfer a fund advance of $3,000 to cover expenditures for Horseshoe Lake (North) Aquatic Weed Control MSBU. (2017-0241)

Grants Administration

15. Approve and authorize the Chairman to execute a Grant Agreement with the State of Florida, Division of Emergency Management, in acceptance of $440,000 for Hurricane Shelter Retrofit Projects; and to execute appropriate Resolution #2017-R-139 implementing the Budget Amendment Request (BAR) #17-073 through the Public Safety Grants Fund in the amount of $440,000 to establish funding for School Shelter Retrofit Projects. (2017-0230)

16. Approve and authorize the Chairman to execute appropriate Resolution #2017-R-140 implementing Budget Amendment Request (BAR) #17-082; and execute a Grant Agreement with the Florida Division of Emergency Management in acceptance of $6,343 through the Hazards Analysis Program. (2017-0219)

Purchasing & Contracts Division

17. Approve Amendment #4 to RFI-601117-11/TLR, Software Installation and Support Services Agreement for Fire Records Management with Image Trend, Inc., Lakeville, MN (Term extension) in the amount of $21,400; and authorize the Purchasing & Contracts Division to execute the Amendment. (2017-0242)

18. Approve Assignment of Master Agreement PS-9464-14/AMM, Landscape Architect Services from Bellomo Herbert and Company, Inc. to GAI Consultants, Inc.; and authorize the Purchasing & Contracts Division to execute the Assignment. (2017-0244)

19. Approve Work Order #77 (Black Hammock Salt Creek Culvert Repair & Longwood Markham Rd Trail) under PS-8148-12/JVP (MSA for CEI Services for Projects under $2,000,000.00) with WSP USA, Inc., Orlando, FL, in the amount of $148,904.86; and authorize the Purchasing & Contracts Division to execute the Work Order. (2017-0238)

20. Approve Work Order #22 (Alton Drive Stormwater-Lake Asher) under PS-9738-14/JVP (MSA for General Environmental Services) with Environmental Consulting & Technology, Inc. (ECT) of New Smyrna Beach, FL, in the amount of $149,720.05; and authorize the Purchasing & Contracts Division to execute the Work Order. (2017-0240)

Districts 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 voted AYE.

CONSTITUTIONAL OFFICER’S CONSENT AGENDA

Clerk & Comptroller’s Office

Motion by Commissioner Dallari, seconded by Commissioner Henley, to approve the following:

21. Approve Expenditure Approval Lists dated July 24 and 31, 2017; Payroll Approval List dated July 27, 2017; and the BCC Official Minutes dated July 25, 2017. (2017-0254)

Districts 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 voted AYE.

-------

The Board noted, for information only, the following Clerk & Comptroller’s “Received and Filed”:

1. 2016 Tax Roll Recapitulation Report from the Seminole County Tax Collector identifying errors, insolvencies, double-assessments, and discounts.

2. Florida Public Service Commission Order #PSC-2017-0283-TRF-EI, Order approving revised underground residential distribution tariffs by Duke Energy Florida LLC, Docket #20170069-EI, issued July 24, 2017.

3. Florida Public Service Commission Order #PSC-2017-0289-TRF-GU, Order modifying Florida Public Utilities Company’s tariffs, electric and gas divisions, Docket #20170110-GU, issued July 24, 2017.

4. First Amendment to Legal Services Agreement for Counsel to Seminole County Value Adjustment Board with J. Marc Jones, P.A.

5. “The Senator” Artwork Gift Agreement with the City of Oviedo for Item #116, as approved by the BCC on 6/14/16.

6. Tourist Tax Funding Agreement with United States Specialty Sports Association, Inc. for the USSSA Men’s and Women’s State Tournament.

7. Parks Contracts for Services with Devin Unterreiner, Ryan M. Mackler, Stephen William All, Tom Myers, and Jacob Chandler.

8. Assistant Tennis Pro Agreements with Heather Walton and Matthew Gutkin.

9. Pet Rescue Cooperative Service Agreements with Freedom Tails Rescue, Inc.; Cavalier Rescue of Florida; and A Forever Home.

10. Conditional Utility Agreement for water and sewer service with 1101 Heathrow Investments LLC for the project known as Park Lane Place.

11. Conditional Utility Agreement for water and sewer service with Meritage Homes of Florida Inc. for the project known as Hawks Crest Phase 1.

12. Sidewalk Easement with Sanlando United Methodist Church, Inc., 1890 West SR 434, Longwood (Grantor).

13. Addendum #1 to Development Order #17-20500021, The Lake Howell Reserve and San Pedro Planned Development a/k/a Hawk’s Crest; JEN Florida 23, LLC.

14. Approval Development Orders #17-30000058, 7417 Portside Court, Carro; #17-30000061, 354 Coble Drive, Snipper; #17-30000063, 218 Nob Hill Circle, Donovan.

15. Developer’s Commitment Agreement #17-20500015 for Lake Florence Preserve; David and Dawn Green.

16. Developer’s Commitment Agreement #17-20500006 for The Station at Alafaya; The Station at Alafaya LLC.

17. Work Order #18 to RFP-0336-15 with Site Secure, LLC, A Miller Electric Company.

18. Work Order #3 to RFP-0672-15 with The Colinas Group, Inc.

19. Change Order #3 to CC-0846-16 with L7 Construction, Inc.

20. Closeout to CC-0974-16 with Pat Lynch Construction.

21. CC-1414-17, Construction Agreement with Hiatt Construction, LLC.

22. CC-1424-17, Construction Agreement with Linton Enterprises, Inc.

23. Amendment #2 to Work Order #36 to PS-8047-12 with Tierra, Inc.

24. Amendment #2 to Work Order #55 to PS-8047-12 with Ardaman & Associates, Inc.

25. Work Order #19 to PS-8072-12 with Albeck Gerken, Inc.

26. Amendment #2 to Work Order #3 to PS-8146-12 with E Sciences, Inc.

27. Amendment #1 to Work Order #66 with PS-8148-12 with CDM Smith, Inc.

28. Second Amendment to PS-8148-12 with WSP USA Inc. f/k/a Parsons Brinckerhoff, Inc.

29. Change Order #2 to Work Order #11 to CC-9072-13 with Linton Enterprises, Inc.

30. Change Order #8 to Work Order #4 to RFQ-9093-13 with Wharton-Smith, Inc.

31. Change Order #2 to Work Order #28 to CC-9192-13 with Corinthian Builders, Inc.

32. Work Order #33 to CC-9192-13 with Linton Enterprises, Inc.

33. Second Amendment to PS-9742-14 with CH2M Hill Engineers, Inc.

34. Amendment #3 to Work Order #1 to RFP-9948-14 with CH2M Hill Engineers, Inc.

35. Seventeenth Amendment to RFP-601461-12 with Florida Cleaning Systems, Inc.

36. First Amendment to IFB-601758-13 with Central Florida Environmental Corporation (Secondary Contractor).

37. Third Amendment to IFB-601758-13 with Schuller Contractors Inc.

38. Seventh Amendment to IFB-601852-13 with Clarke Mosquito Control Products, Inc.

39. Bids as follows:

RFP-602874-17 from PetData, Inc.;

RFP-602871-17 from Advanced Data Processing, Inc. (Subsidiary of Intermedix Corp.); Life Line Billing Systems, LLC d/b/a LifeQuest Services; McKesson PST Services, Inc.; Digitech Computer, Inc.;

RFP-602848-17 from DELTAWRX Management Consultants; Mission Critical Partners, Inc.; SDTR Consulting, LLC;

RFP-602840-17 from Elephant Ear Social Community; agencyTHE, LLC; Datanautix Inc.; Smith & Surrency LLC d/b/a Digital Edge; Evok Advertising and Design, Inc.; Moxe, Inc.; NOISE, Inc.; Sacoto Films Productions, LLC; TJM Communications, Inc.; Jennifer Peace; Paradise Advertising & Marketings, Inc.; and

CC-1424-17 from Linton Enterprises, Inc.; BSE Construction Group, LLC; Dager Constructions, Inc.; Corinthian Builders, Inc.

REGULAR AGENDA

Agenda Item #22 – 2017-0151

Chairman Horan advised that staff is requesting that this item be pulled from the agenda; Request for Presentations from evok Advertising and Design and Paradise Advertising & Marketing; Discuss, Rank and Award RFP-602840-17/BJC, Marketing Services for Orlando North Seminole County Tourism; and authorize the Purchasing & Contracts Division to execute the Agreement with the selected firm.

Ms. Guillet advised that there were some questions that came up late in the day yesterday that staff was not able to answer, so the decision was made to pull the item while they pursue answers to those questions before they bring the item back to the Board for their consideration. Commissioner Carey noted that part of the action that was being requested was to approve an extension for Paradise through November 30, 2017. She asked when the contract was set to terminate and Ms. Guillet responded that it ends at the end of September. Discussion ensued as to when this item will come back to the Board. Ms. Guillet advised that they will bring the item back hopefully at the first meeting in September. They will let the Board know as soon as they have had a chance to look at the things that were raised yesterday. Ms. Guillet explained that they will have to do something about the existing marketing contract before the end of September.

-------

Chairman Horan recessed the meeting at 10:59 a.m., reconvening at 1:30 p.m., with all Commissioners and all other Officials, with Commissioner Constantine entering late, and with the exception of Deputy Clerk Jane Spencer who was replaced by Deputy Clerk Kyla Spencer, who were present at the Opening Session.

PROOFS OF PUBLICATION

Motion by Commissioner Henley, seconded by Commissioner Carey, to authorize the filing of the proofs of publication for this meeting's scheduled public hearings into the Official Record.

Districts 1, 2, 4 and 5 voted AYE.

-------

Commissioner Dallari submitted ex parte communications (received and filed) regarding the Public Hearings before the Board today.

-------

Commissioner Constantine reentered the meeting at this time.

PUBLIC HEARINGS

SEMINOLE COUNTY PORT AUTHORITY (SCOPA)

FISCAL YEAR 2017/18 BUDGET

Agenda Item #23 – PH-2017-0252

Proof of publication calling for a public hearing to consider approval of the Seminole County Port Authority (SCOPA) Fiscal Year 2017/18 Budget as presented, received and filed.

Andrew Van Gaale, Director of the Seminole County Port Authority, addressed the Board and noted SCOPA Chairman Cliff Miller is with him today. Mr. _%_Van _%_Gaale stated he is here to_!;1__!<1__!=1_ _!>1_present _!?1_the _!@3__#_Fiscal _#_Year 2017/18_!C1__!D3__!G2_ budget _!I1__!J1__%_for the _%_Port _!K1__#_Authority_!L1_ _!O1_and_!P1_ would like _!Q1_to _!R1_touch _!S1_on _!T1_the _!U1_current _!V1_year_!W1_, _!X1__!Y1_how _!Z2_they are _!\1_going _!]1_to _!^1_end _!_1_the year and _!`1__!a1_wha_!b1_t's happening at the _"_port_%_._!c2__!e1__!f3__!i1__!j1_ _!k1__%_He opined they _!l1_had _!m1_a _!n1_pretty good _!o1_year_!p3_ and averaged about 99% _!s2_occupancy_!u1__!v1__!w1__!x1_, which is really good _!y1_on the _!z1_rent_!{1_al _!|1_side_!}1__!~1_ and leasing side. _#_As they end the year _%_September 30th, they are looking at about $1,976,000, and that is_#_ _"_pretty _!�1_good _!�1_for their _!‘1_op_!’1_eration_!“1__!”1_. Mr. Van Gaale explained t_%_heir _!•3_expenses _!˜1_this current year are a _!™2_little _!›2_higher _!�1_than _!ž1_norm_!Ÿ1_al _! 1_because _!¡1_of _!¢1_some _!£2_projects_!¥1_ they are undertaking_!¦2_, primarily _!¨1_a mast_!©1_er_!ª1_-drain_!«1_age _!¬2_project_!®1__!¯1_. _%_The operational expenditures are about $1,800,000, which is a _!°2__!²1__!³1__!´3__!·1__!¸1__!¹1__!º1__!»1_small_!¼1_er _!½1_profit _!¾1_this _!¿1_year _!À1_because _!Á1_of the _!Â2_higher _!Ä3_expenses. _!Ç1_ He stated in _%_October of this year, _!Õ2_they will _!×1_be _!Ø2_bringing _!Ú1__!Û1_the _%_Board $500,000_!Ü1__!Ý1__!Þ1_ out _!ß1_of _!à2_surplus _!â1_funds _!ã1_and _!ä2_that_!æ1_ is on _!ç1_top _!è1_of the _!é3_$200,000 _!ì1_they _!í1_brought _!î1__!ï1_the _%_Board last _!ð1_December, which totals $700,000_!õ1__!ö3_ _!ù1_for year _!ú2_2016/17 _!ü1_while _"!1_still _""2_trying _"$1_to _"%2_complete _"'1_some _"(2_major _"*2_projects_",1__"-1_ at the _"_port.

In regard to this year’s budget, Mr. Van Gaale explained for 2017/18_"@2_, t_"@2_hey have an operational budget and a total _"B1_cash _"C1__"D1__"E1__"F2__"H1__"I1_budget. _%_T_"I1_he total budget, cash _"J2_carry_"L1_for_"M1_ward and con_"N1_trib_"O2_utions_"Q1_ all_"R1__"S1_-in-all _"T2_total_"V1_ $4,238,017. _%_They a_%_re_"W1__"X1__"Y1__"Z1__"[3__"^2_ _"`1_pro_"a2_jecting _"c2_revenue _"e1_of _"f1_$1,958,951_"g5__"l1__"m5__"r1_, which is _"w1_an _"x1__"y2_increase_"{1_ _"~1_of about $135,000 and that's to do with strong occupancy, annual increases in rent, and miscellaneous income _"’1_from the _"“1__"_port _"”1_op_"•2_erations_"—1_. _%_Mr. Van Gaale stated _"˜1_ex_"™1_pend_"š1_itures are_"›1__"œ1_ going _"�1_down _"ž1_a _"Ÿ2_little _"¡1_bit_"¢1__"£1__"¤1_ since they did phase one of a major drainage project that is currently underway. _%_The ex_"¥1_penditures _"§1_are _"¨2_dropping _"ª1_down about a quarter-million dollars _"«1_to _"¬1_a_"1_bout $1,794,653. So _"À1_as _"Á1_they _"Â1_get _"Ã1_thr_"Ä1_ough a _"Å1_lot_"Æ1_ of _"Ç1_the _"È2_capital _"Ê1_im_"Ë1_provements _"Ì1_in the next couple of years, their expenditures are _"Í2_planning _"Ï1_to go _"Ð1_down_"Ñ1_, therefore _"Ò3_increasing _"Õ1_con_"Ö1_trib_"×2__"Ù1_utions to the _"Ú1__#_Count_"Û1_y_"Ü1_. Mr. _%_Van G_%_Gaale reiterated they are looking_%_ at a profit of just under $200,000_"Ý1__"Þ1__"ß1_ _"à1_for _"á1_next _"â1_year _"ã1_which _"ä1__"å1_will _"æ1_start _"ç2_growing _"é1_as _"ê1__"ë1_they move _"ì1_into _"í1_the_"î2_ future_"ð1__"ñ2_, while still planning _"ó2_capital _"õ1_im_"ö1_provements_"÷1_.

Mr. _%_Van _%_Gaale stated they_%_ _"_still _"ù1_have _"ú1_a _"û1__"ü1_five-year _#!2_capital _##1_im_#$1_provement_#%1__#&2_ plan, but it is not as aggressive as it_#(1_ has been _#)1_with th_#*1_e drain_#+1_age _#,2_project_#.1__#/2_._#41__#51_. _%__%_They will have a cash-carryforward amount of $_#F6_2,279,000. _#L2__%__#N2_\_#q1__%_They _#r1_have _#s2_enough _#u2_money _#w1_next _#x1_year _#y1_planned to _#z1_send _#{1_the_#|1_ _#_Count_#}1_y _#~1_another _#1_$700,000 in excess funds, and that is flat budgeted, so they don't have to split the years like they have done in the last few years.

In regard to Fiscal Year 2017/18, Mr. Van Gaale stated they will have a cash-carryforward balance of $_#´1_1,743,364 and that allows the Port Authority to use it for following year capital _#Ó1_im_#Ô1_provements_#Õ1_, operational reserves, some _#Ö1_ca_#×1_ta_#×1_strophic_#Ø1_ _#Ù1_re_#Ú2_serves_#Ü1_, and _#Ý2_really _#ß1_pro_#à1_tect _#á1_t_#á1_he _%_Port _%_Authority and the _%_County as they_#â1__#ã1__#ä1__#å1__#æ1_ move _#ç1_into _#è1_the _#é2_future_#ë1_. Mr. _%_Van _%_Gaale ended his presentation by stating they are_#í2_ _#ï1_being _#ð1_f_#ò1__#ò1_iscally con_#ó1_serv_#ô1_ative_#õ1_. _%_There are still _#ö1_just _#÷1_two _#ø1__#ù1_people _#ú2_running _#ü1_the_$!1_ _$"1_port with no plans on staffing or hiring addition_$,1_al _$-1_people_$.1__$/2_ or spending _$11_a_$21_ny extra _$32_money. _%_They a_%_re halfway through phase one of the _$51__$61__$71__$81__$91_drain_$:1_age _$;1_pro_$<1__$=1_ject and next year they will finish the second phase. _%_Then from there_$>1__$?1_, _$@2_they will _$B1_probably do _$C1__$D2_some _$F1_landscaping enhancements_$G2_, _$I1_side_$J2_walk_$L1_ safety _$M1_improvements,_$N1_ _$O2_lighting_$Q1_, and other _$R2_minor _$T2_thin_$V1__$W1_gs as they move forward. _%_They still _$X1__$Y2_remain_$[1_ debt _$\1_free_$]1_, _$^1__$_2_and _$a1_an _$b1_in_$c1_come_$d1__$e2_-producing _$g1_as_$h1__$i1_set for the _$j1__$k1__%_County_$l1_.

With regard to public participation, no one in the audience spoke in support or in opposition to Item #23, and public input was closed.

Motion by Commissioner Carey, seconded by Commissioner Constantine, to approve the Seminole County Port Authority Fiscal Year 2017/18 Budget as presented, as described in the proof of publication.

Districts 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 voted AYE.

CONSOLIDATED STREET LIGHTING DISTRICT

(CSLD) ORDINANCE AMENDMENT

Agenda Item #24 – PH-2017-0142

Proof of publication calling for a public hearing to consider approval of the Consolidated Street Lighting District (CSLD) Ordinance Amendment, repealing and replacing Ordinance #2016-25, received and filed.

Kathy Moore, Resource Management Department, addressed the Board and presented the Item as outlined in the Agenda Memorandum. She stated this Municipal Services Benefit Unit (MSBU) was originally established to fund decorative street lighting that was selected and installed by the developer. The dissolution of the MSBU is requested by the property owners due to the high cost of operating and maintaining the decorative equipment. Ms. Moore explained the goal that was expressed by the community is to have the existing equipment removed as each of the two supporting contracts expire. Per communication from the Veramonte HOA representative, the equipment will be replaced and funded privately at the discretion of the HOA. She added the dissolution was initiated by the Veramonte HOA and carried a community-support rate of 75% as demonstrated through the standard petition process.

Ms. Moore stated the assessment rates approved for levy via the 2017 Assessment Roll are anticipated to be the final assessment for this MSBU and have been calculated according to the respective contract termination dates. The administrative revisions recommended by the MSBU program are documented in Exhibits B-1 through B-3, which include an Administrative Boundary Adjustment for street lights operating along Wimbledon Drive. The Boundary Adjustment includes the addition of 17 properties that benefit from the lights on Wimbledon Drive as the road provides access to the property. Ms. Moore explained the Boundary Update is respective to operating costs only. The maintenance expenses continue to be funded separately as this equipment is the responsibility of the property owners of Shannon Downs and the recommendation of this update was initially communicated to the owners of impacted property this past February.

Ms. Moore stated if approved, the amended Ordinance will be effective October 2017. Following public input, the action requested is to adopt the Ordinance and authorize the Chairman to execute the revised version of the Ordinance.

With regard to public participation, no one in the audience spoke in support or in opposition to Item #24, and public input was closed.

Motion by Commissioner Carey, seconded by Commissioner Dallari, to approve and authorize the Chairman to execute the Consolidated Street Lighting District (CSLD) Ordinance Amendment #2017-29, repealing and replacing Ordinance #2016-25, deleting the Veramonte Municipal Services Benefit Unit (MSBU) and making other minor administrative adjustments; and to adopt the respective initial assessment rolls, as described in the proof of publication.

Districts 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 voted AYE.

RESOLUTION TO ADOPT THE 2017

NON-AD VALOREM ASSESSMENT ROLL

Agenda Item #25 – PH-2017-0255

Proof of publication calling for a public hearing to consider approval of a Resolution to adopt the 2017 Non-Ad Valorem Assessment Roll with certification provided to the Seminole County Tax Collector, received and filed.

Kathy Moore, Resource Management Department, addressed the Board and presented the Item as outlined in the Agenda Memorandum. She explained what the Non-Ad Valorem Assessment Roll is. She stated notices were mailed in July to the owners of all property subject to non-ad valorem assessment and the Roll presented today reflects the mailed-notice data as well as the consolidated street light Ordinance as amended today. The Roll is to be submitted to the Tax Collector by September 15th and will include minor updates to accommodate property record changes initiated by the Property Appraiser as well as any service option changes received for solid waste management services.

Ms. Moore stated following public input, the requested Board action is to adopt and provide certification of the 2017 Non-Ad Valorem Assessment Roll.

Greg Van Arsdale, 1584 Crosbeam Drive, addressed the Board and stated previously he had written a letter and email to Chairman Horan and Commissioner Dallari in 2014 about his problem with the Solid Waste Program. He explained the County is going to change the Solid Waste Program to options one and two, deleting options three and four; and he has a problem with that because the two options that will remain are the most expensive. H_%æ1_e _%ç1_does not think that this _%è1_program _%é1_has _%ê1_been _%ë2__%í1_looked at _%î1_in _%ï1_a _%ð2_diligent _%ò2_format _%ô1_by _%õ4_eliminating _%ù1_the_%ú1_ most _%û2_econom_&!1_ical _&"2_portions _&$1_of the _&%2_service_&'1_ and expressed he doesn't know_&(1__&)1_ _&*1_what _&+1_the_&,1_ ben_&-1_efit _&.1_is to _&/1_him_&01_ _&11_or the _&21_other _&32_citizens _&51_in _&61__&71_the same _&82_service _&:2_category_&<1_. Mr. Van Arsdale discussed how other counties have moved to solid waste pickup once a week. H_&¼1_e stated he is also _&½1_dis_&¾2_turb_&À1_ed _&Á1_by the _&Â1_fact_&Ã1_ that _&Ä2_it_&Æ1_ is not _&Ç3_indicated _&Ê1_that _&Ë1_this _&Ì3_is _&Ï2_a hearing _&Ñ1_to _&Ò1_address _&Ó1_this _&Ô2_matter_&Ö1_. _%_It says be_&×2_ginning _&Ù2__%_January 1st, o_%_ptions three and _&Û1__&Ü2__&Þ1_four will _&ß1_be _&à1_de_&á2_leted_&ã1__&ä1_; so there is _&å2__&ç1__&è2__%__&ê1_a _&ë2_foregone _&í1_con_&î1_clusion _&ï1_that _&ð2_it's _&ò1_over_&ó1_. _&ô1__%_He asked the _%_Board to reconsider their position.

With regard to public participation, no one else in the audience spoke in support or in opposition to Item #25, and public input was closed.

Speaker Request Form was received and filed.

Commissioner Carey explained why the once-a-week pickup is actually a more expensive proposition than two times a week. _%_She stated the _%_County has_'²2_ _'´1_been _'µ2_trying _'·1_to _'¸1_keep _'¹1__'º1_it as _'»2_economical_'½1_ as possible for their residents_'Ä1_ and that_'Å1__'Æ1__'Ç1_ is why _'È1_the _'É1_decision _'Ê1_was _'Ë1_made _'Ì1_to go _'Í1_with _'Î1_these _'Ï2_two options_'Ý1_._%_ Commissioner _%_Constantine noted having four_("1__(#1__($2__(&1__('1_ plans _((1_just _()2_didn't _(+1_make _(,1_any _(-1_sense_(.1_ and _(/1__%_Chairman _%_Horan added i_%_t was an administrative problem. _%_Commissioner _%_Constantine explained_(<1__(=1__(>1__(?1__(@1_ the _(A1_garb_(B1_age _(C2_collectors _(E2_didn't _(G1_know _(H1_who _(I1_was _(J2_having _(L1_the _(M1_one_(N1_-day _(O1_or _(P1_two-_(Q2__(Q2_day_(S1_ p_(U1__(U1_ickup. _%_He opined that solid waste pickup is a collective issue and the program offers a more sanitary situation for everyone.

Motion by Commissioner Carey, seconded by Commissioner Henley, to approve and authorize the Chairman to execute appropriate Resolution #2017-R-141 adopting the 2017 Non-Ad Valorem Assessment Roll with certification provided to the Seminole County Tax Collector, as described in the proof of publication.

Districts 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 voted AYE.

GRACE LAKE AQUATIC VEGETATION AND LAKE MANAGEMENT

MUNICIPAL SERVICES BENEFIT UNIT (MSBU)

Agenda Item #26 – PH-2017-0259

Proof of publication calling for a public hearing to consider an Ordinance creating the Grace Lake Aquatic Vegetation and Lake Management Municipal Services Benefit Unit (MSBU) to generate funding to support ongoing management of the lake and provide adoption of the initial assessment roll, received and filed.

Kathy Moore, Resource Management Department, presented the Item as outlined in the Agenda Memorandum. She noted the request for establishing this MSBU was initiated by community application. Ms. Moore stated the initial assessment roll is included for adoption in the proposed Ordinance with levy through the 2017 property tax bill. The fluctuation in annual cost may be particularly relevant to Grace Lake as it has experienced an unusual history in which it had receded substantially for a period of years due to sinkhole activity.

Ms. Moore stated following public input, the action requested for the Board is to consider adopting an Ordinance creating the Grace Lake Aquatic Vegetation Management MSBU as requested by the majority of the lake-front property owners. She noted a representative of the Applicant is present and would like to address the Board.

Mark Kamrath, 1377 South Ridge Lake Circle, President of the North Ridge Homeowners Association, and Marianne King, 1339 Grace View Court, Vice President of the North Ridge Homeowners Association, addressed the Board. Mr. Kamrath read aloud his comments (received and filed) in support of the Grace Lake MSBU, and Ms. King submitted photos (received and filed) of Grace Lake. Mr. Kamrath pointed out the excessive hydrilla in the photos that is growing rapidly. He stated they have been told if it continues to grow at this rate, by October or November it will take over the entire lake. He thanked the Board for their consideration.

Vanessa Smith, 1227 Baypoint Court, addressed the Board and stated she has a bachelor’s degree in water chemistry and worked 12 years for Palm Beach County Water Utility and the Winter Park Lakes Management Department. With that experience, she is here in support of the MSBU proposal. She expressed the lake vegetation should be professionally administered and treated. She is also thrilled with the idea that the money will be collected and managed by the County. Ms. Smith stated she attended the presentation from the MSBU County officials and they were able to answer her questions and concerns and she was quite impressed with their professionalism and experience in this matter. She discussed the growing vegetation issue, the affordable price of the assessment, and the value of the lake.

Patricia Rubino, 1534 Grace Lake Circle, addressed the Board and stated she is here specifically in regard to the treatment of the lake such as applying the chemicals and herbicides. Ms. Rubino explained there is another option. There has been successful use of just fish and not chemicals in lakes all over the county and the rest of the state. Ms. Rubino stated she has a nine-year-old son who has some severe allergies as well asthma and eczema. When he has an allergic reaction to things such as food, chemicals, or environmental issues, he can go from anaphylactic shock to asthma attacks to rashes and hives. She added there is no way to predict if he is going to have a reaction to these sort of chemicals, but the chemical “glyphosate” is being investigated by Morgan and Morgan for a possible class action lawsuit. She discussed how chemicals that may be safe to most people can affect her son.

With regard to public participation, no one else in the audience spoke in support or in opposition to Item #26, and public input was closed.

Speaker Request Forms were received and filed.

Gloria Eby, Lake Management Program, Principal Scientist, addressed the Board and discussed the different types of herbicides that the County uses. She stated there are options where they can work with an individual when it comes to shoreline treatments, like glyphosate, where they become a no-spray zone specifically for the emergent vegetation that they would be addressing. They would simply enter GPS coordinates for a particular parcel and not treat in that area, so they can accommodate for those types of concerns. When it comes to hydrilla, Ms. Eby explained staff is proposing fluridone, which is known as “no risk” and there are a lot of statistics as far as how much you have to consume before a human being is adversely reacted to that. She reiterated there are options where they can compromise related to glyphosate use and a personal property owner.

Ms. Eby stated she has extensive history in using triploid grass carp fish for hydrilla management. Grass carp are a solution, they will target hydrilla; however, it will target other species because a fish doesn’t know any better. It will go for the other natives that are within the lake, and what they often see is that lake turns into a dead lake and you get more algal blooms that are occurring which could be more of an adverse effect, especially if somebody’s got some allergens. She explained once you put the fish in, you can’t take them out because they are very smart fish and they are herbivores, so you can’t use a regular lure to get them out. To get control over the hydrilla, you would have to stock the fish at a very high rate that is going to denude or void the lake of beneficial aquatic plants and you will see some adverse reactions to the lake.

Commissioner Carey confirmed with Ms. Eby that they could identify Ms. Rubino’s property and not spray along her shoreline. Ms. Eby clarified that is correct only for the emergent scope of work but not for the hydrilla. Upon an inquiry by Commissioner Carey, Ms. Eby stated the County treats 19 MSBU lakes and all of the parks. Commissioner Carey asked if the County has ever had any notification that there has been a human reaction to the best practices that the County initiates in those lakes and parks. Ms. Eby answered related to herbicide, no.

Commissioner Dallari asked how the work on I-4 would affect this lake and MSBU. Commissioner Carey asked what is happening with One Church for the overflow. Jean Jreij, Public Works Director, addressed the Board and stated Grace Lake has outfall that goes to the west side of I-4. The DOT drainage is moving to the north side and not impacting that drainage. Commissioner Dallari asked if the DOT is using Grace Lake for any fallout or any drainage requirements for I-4, and Mr. Jreij answered no. Commissioner Dallari asked if they are going to put any retention ponds in or around Grace Lake that will affect that lake. Mr. Jreij answered they are moving it to the north so they’re not going to be discharging through Grace Lake. Commissioner Dallari questioned if they are going to touch the lines running underneath I-4; and Mr. Jreij answered they are not going to touch those lines, they will remain the same.

Commissioner Carey confirmed with Mr. Jreij that Grace Lake is still going to “pop off” and go under the interstate and over to One Church. Mr. Jreij stated they are doing a study now to see if there is another way to relieve the flooding on the west side, but they don’t know yet what they are going to do; but the DOT will not be discharging through Grace Lake.

Motion by Commissioner Henley, seconded by Commissioner Constantine, to adopt Ordinance #2017-30 creating the Grace Lake Aquatic Vegetation and Lake Management Municipal Services Benefit Unit (MSBU) to generate funding to support ongoing management of the lake and provide adoption of the initial assessment roll, as described in the proof of publication.

Districts 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 voted AYE.

Chairman Horan noted with regard to Ms. Rubino’s situation, she could get with staff so they can arrange to exclude that shoreline.

RLH CONSTRUCTION OFFICE SMALL SCALE FUTURE LAND USE

(SSFLU) MAP AMENDMENT AND REZONE/Richard Haines

Agenda Item #27 – PH-2017-0023

Proof of publication calling for a public hearing to consider a Small Scale Future Land Use Map Amendment from Medium-Density Residential to Planned Development and a Rezone from R-1 (Single-Family Dwelling) to PD (Planned Development) for an office building on 1.85 acres, located on the east side of W. SR 426, approximately 300 feet northeast of James Drive, Richard Haines, received and filed.

Matt Davidson, Planning & Development, addressed the Board and reviewed the Item as outlined in the Agenda Memorandum. He added the Applicant recently held a community meeting last Wednesday evening with several of the surrounding Jamestown residents to discuss the proposed project. He stated staff recommends approval.

Greg Crawford, Florida Engineering Group, 5127 South Orange Avenue, addressed the Board and stated he represents RLH, owners of the property, and is present to address any questions the Board may have. Commissioner Carey stated there is no access proposed to this site except off of SR 426, and Mr. Crawford replied that is correct. Commissioner Carey continued there is no access back to the community. She asked where they are proposing the masonry wall. Mr. Crawford answered the wall will be along the three sides of the site and the only place that won’t have the wall is where the existing wetland is going to remain on the back north, sort of the north-east corner of the property.

Beverly Stewart, 1933 South Street, addressed the Board and recited 1 Corinthians 14:40, “Let all things be done decently and in order.” She stated she is here as a representative of the Jamestown subdivision and to voice her opposition to the Item. She opined the residents in the subdivision do not want or need an office building in their community. What they want is their R-1 (Single-Family Dwelling) status to stay as is. She discussed needing a viable, working drainage system that would be a blessing to everyone in Jamestown. Ms. Stewart stated she would love to have domestic tranquility that is afforded to her by the Constitution of the United States nationally and locally. She expressed her distrust in RLH representatives. She asked the Board to disapprove this request.

With regard to public participation, no one else in the audience spoke in support or in opposition to Item #27, and public input was closed.

Speaker Request Form and Written Comment Forms were received and filed.

Commissioner Dallari stated the Applicant has had a public meeting with the community and heard some comments from them. He asked if the Applicant has tried to address any of their concerns. Mr. Crawford answered they are accessing the main highway so they are not going back within the community itself. And also to help “stream” the neighbors from the development, they have walls and landscape along the property. He stated they hope the project will fit in and also transition between the different uses along the roadway and the residential lots in the back. Commissioner Carey stated in looking at the site plan, they have a wall along the back up to the wetland and the pond is in the back, parking in the back, small 2,700-square-foot building in the back and all of that is accessed by CR 426. Mr. Crawford replied that is correct.

Commissioner Carey asked for the aerial map to be displayed. She stated CR 426 is a major commercial industrial-type corridor and that is where they would expect this type of development to occur. She asked about the surrounding industrial office developments including the Magnolia Corporate Center, the DOT Oviedo Operations Center, and the Duke Energy/Jamestown Complex. Mr. Davidson confirmed they are all large industrial properties. In regard to the property adjacent to the proposed development that is zoned C-1 (Non-Conforming Use), Commissioner Carey asked what that structure is. Mr. Davidson answered it is a single-family home that is legally non-conforming to both the zoning district and future land use. So if it was to develop, it would have to come in and rezone to a more particular zoning type.

Commissioner Dallari stated in looking at the zoning map, he sees PD across the street, C-1 adjacent to it, C-2 right across the street, as well as C-3 and other various office buildings along the area. He explained even though the property abuts Jamestown, it does not go into Jamestown access-wise. The County has had other projects that have tried to access into Jamestown that they have denied because they are trying to keep the Jamestown community whole; but since this is accessing onto a major arterial road, CR 426, he doesn’t see an issue with it.

Motion by Commissioner Dallari, seconded by Commissioner Carey, to adopt Ordinance #2017-31 enacting a Small Scale Future Land Use Map Amendment from Medium-Density Residential to Planned Development; adopt Ordinance #2017-32, enacting a Rezone from R-1 (Single-Family Dwelling) to PD (planned Development); and approve the associated Development Order and Master Development Plan for an office building on 1.85 acres, located on the east side of W. SR 426, approximately 300 feet northeast of James Drive, as described in the proof of publication; Richard Haines, Applicant.

Districts 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 voted AYE.

OLD LOCKWOOD FAWN RUN PD REZONE/

Raymond Harrison

Agenda Item #28 – PH-2017-0030

Proof of publication calling for a public hearing to consider a Rezone from A-1 (Agriculture) to PD (Planned Development) for a 32-lot, single-family residential subdivision on approximately 21.61 acres, located on the east side of Old Lockwood Road, approximately 300 feet north of Brickell Place, Raymond Harrison, received and filed.

Brian Walker, Planning & Development, addressed the Board and reviewed the Item as outlined in the Agenda Memorandum. He noted staff recommends approval of this item.

Charlie Madden, Madden Moorehead & Stokes, Inc., addressed the Board and noted he represents Harrison Realty and Development, who is the contract purchaser of the property. Mr._:A1_ _:B2__%_Madden stated they have_:D1__:E1__:F2_ _:H1__:I2_had numerous _:K1_community _:L1_meet_:M1_ings _:N2_with the resi_:P1_dents _:Q1_to the _:R1_east _:S1_to _:T2_hear their _:V1_concerns _:W1_and _:X1_have tr_:Y1_ied to_:Z1_ address _:[1_them_:\1_._:]2__:_2__:a1__:b1__:c1__:d1__:e1__:f1__:g1__:h1__:i1_ _%_He would like to put a _:j1_few _:k2_thin_:m1_gs on the _:n2_public _:p1_record _:q1_that _:r1__:s1_they have _:t2_committed _:v1_to _:w1_the_:x1_ residents to the _:y1_east, _:z1_a_:{1_lthough some _:|1_of _:}2_it_:2_ is covered _:�1_in the _:‚1_D_:ƒ1__:„1_evelopment _%_Order and some _:…1_of it is between _:†1_the _:‡1_prop_:ˆ1_erty _:‰1_own_:Š1_ers_:‹1_. _:Œ1__:�1__:Ž1__%_He explained he is going_%_ to quickly run through the exhibits (received and filed) that he went over with the_:�1__:�1__:‘1__:’1__:“1__:”1__:•1__:–1__:—1__:˜1_ residents.

Mr. _%_Madden stated _"_everything _:±1_is _:²1__%_L_:³1__:´1__:µ3_ow-Density _%_Residential _%_(LDR) including _:¸1_the_:¹1_ area _:º1_to the _:»1_east_:¼1_. _:½2__%_That area is_:¿1__:À1__:Á1_ an _:Â1_older_:Ã1__:Ä1_ five_:Å2_-acre_:Ç1_-lot_:È1_ sub_:É3_division_:Ì1_ that _:Í1_ha_:Î1_s been _:Ï1_there _:Ð1_for _:Ñ1_a _:Ò1_long _:Ó1_time_:Ô1_. _:Õ1__:Ö1__%__:Ö1_They were very sensitive to the _"__:×2_folks _:Ù1_that _:Ú1_live_:Û1_ down _:Ü1__%__%_Fawn _:Ý1__#_Run_:Þ1__:ß1__:à1__:á2__:ã1__:ä1_ because their private road actually passes through the subject property, _;%1__;%1_and _;&1_the _;'1_subject property's H_;(1_O_;)1_A _;*2_maintains _;,1_that _;-1_portion _;.1_of _;/1_th_;01_e _%_Fawn R_"_Run residents' road so they _;11__;22__;41__;52__;71__;81__;91__;:2_wanted _;<1_to _;=1_know _;>1_what _;?1_the_;@3_ residents' expectation_;C1_s were_;D1_. _;E1__%__;F2__;H1__;I1__;J1__;K1__;L1__;M2__;O1_They held _;P1_three _;Q1_community _;R1_m_;S1__;T1_eetings and the residents_;U1_the _;a1_want_;b1_ed t_;c1_o see _;d1_some _;e1_specif_;f2_ics _;h1_on _;i1_what _;j1__;k1_was being _;l1_pro_;m2_pos_;o1_ed for _;p3_landscaping_;s1_. _;t1__#__;u1__;v1__#__;w1__%__;x1__;y1_Mr. _%_Madden explained _%_Fawn R_%_Run is just a dirt road, and there_"_ is not a mandatory _%_HOA so the neighbors periodically get together to try to fix it themselves. _%__;µ1_For the subject property's section of the private road, t_;µ1_he_;¶1_ residents r_;¹1_equested_;º1__;½1__;¾1_ _;À1_something _;Á2_better _;Ã1_than _;Ä1_dirt _;Å1_that _;Æ1_might _;Ç1_be _;È3_stabilized _;Ë1_and they agreed to that_;Ì1__%__;Ð1_they . _;Ñ1__#_They _;Ò2_wanted _;Ô1_to _;Õ1_see _;Ö1_the _;×3_landscaping _;Ú1__;Û1__;Ü1__;Ý1_so _%_Mr. _%_Madden provided them with _;Þ1__;ß2__;á1_a _;â1_landscape plan (received and filed) _;è1_which is not _;é1_part _;ê1_of _;ë1_a _;ì2_zoning _;î1_request _;ï1_requirement_;ð1_, but they wanted to see it so _;ñ1_i_;ñ1_t was _;ò3_prepared _;õ1__;ö1_for _;÷1_them_;ø1__;ù1__;ú1_.

Mr. _%_Madden stated _<&1_right _<'1_now _<(1__#_Fawn _<)1__#_Run _<*1__<+3__<.1__</1__<02_is _<21_a _<31_70-_<41_foot _<51_right_<61_-of_<71_-way _<81_and it looks like this _<92_immense _<;1_dirt _<<1_road _<=1_that _<>1_is _<?2_pretty_<A3_ welcoming _<D1_to_<E1__<F1__<G1__<H1__<I1_ drive down. _%_The residents don't want it gated off, _<c1_but _<d1_they _<e1_want _<f1_it _<g1_to _<h1_look _<i1_a _<j4_little _<n1_more _<o1_private_<p1_. _#_So _<q1__<r1__<s1__<t1_in _<u2_working _<w1_with _<x1_the_<y1_ residents, they came up with a _<z4_design_<~1_ (received and filed) that will _<1_still _<€1_meet _<�1__#_Fire_<‚1_. _%_The_<ƒ1__<„2_ residents asked _<†1_for _<‡1_the _<ˆ2_24_<Š1__<‹1_-foot stabilized drive_<Œ1_, which _<�2_they are _<�1_going _<�1_to do_<‘1_; and _<’1__<“1_they _<”2_asked _<–1_for _<—3_th_<š2_e structure _<œ1_to be _<�1_buil_<ž2_t giving _< 1_it _<¡1_a _<¢1_rural_<£1_ look _<¤1_and _<¥1_also _<¦2_necking _<¨1_it _<©1_down_<ª1__<«1_. _%_They can put a _"_private _"_road sign up and things like that where it appears more private and a little less conducive to curious _<¾2_folks _<À2_just driving _<Â1_down _<Ã1_and _<Ä1_around _<Å1_the _<Æ1_whole _<Ç1_loop_<È1_. Mr. Madden noted they also wanted to see a cross _<Ò1_section _<Ó1_of _<Ô1_how_<Õ1_ the _<Ø1_road _<Ù1_would _<Ú1_be _<Û2_gra_<Ý1_ded, so _<Þ1_they were s_<Þ1_hown _%_Proposed 70' _%_Fawn _%_Run _%_(received and filed) _<â1_and he _<ã1__<ä1__<å1_explained the road will be _<æ2_concrete _<è1_fines, _<é1_which _<ê1_is _<ë2__<í1_a _<î1_much _<ï2__<ñ1_more durable _<ò2_surface _<ô1_than _<õ1_the_<ö1_ dirt _<÷1_that _<ø1_is _<ù1_there _<ú1_today_<û1_.

In regard to a few other issues, Mr. Madden stated they didn’t feel a left_=11_-turn _=21_lane _=31_would _=41_be _=53_warranted at _=81_the subject property's _=92_entrance _=;1_which will be_=<1__==1__=>2_will lined _=@1_up _=A1_with the _=B1_sub_=C2_division _=E1_across _=F1_the_=G1_ street_=H1_. They_=I1__#__%_They were the engineer of record_%_ for _%_Bellevue, and they did a left-turn lane there because t_%_hey thought it made sense being across the street from a high school with young drivers and so forth. Mr. Madden stated they also pulled the records from _%_MetroPlan_=¾1_ to _=Ì2_look _=Î1_at _=Ï1_any _=Ð2_crashes _=Ò1_at these_=Ó1_the lo _=Ô3_inter_=×2_sections _=Ù1_in the _=Ú1_last _=Û1_five_=Ü1_ years, which do not have left-turn lanes, _>!1_and there _>"1_was _>#1_one _>$2_minor _>&1_rear_>'1_-_>'1_end accident at_>(1__>)1_ _#_Fawn Run _>*1_and _>+1__#_Old _>,1__#_Lock_>-1_wood_>.1_._>/2__>11__>22__>41__>51__>61__>71__>81_ _%_They also had a left-turn-lane warrant study done which was presented to _%_Public _%_Works for review, and they approved it, thus not requiring a left-turn lane at the entrance.

Robin Carey, 2212 Red Ember Road, addressed the Board and stated the _>„1_lot _>…2_sizes and setbacks _>‡1_on _>ˆ1__#_Old _>‰1__#_Lock_>Š1_wood _>‹1__#_Road _>Œ1__>’1_are _>“2_shrinking _>•1_with _>–1_each _>—1_development _>˜1_that _>™1_comes _>š1_in_>›1_. _>œ2__%_She opined it is _>ž1_very _>Ÿ1_mis_> 2_leading _>¢2_for _%__>¢2_s_>¢2_taff to say “2_>¤1__>¥1_.3 net” _>¦1_because_>©1_ both _>ª1__%_Hampton _%_Estates and _%_Ellingsworth have 15-foot side setbacks and 30-foot rear backyard_>«1__>¬1_s. _%_They're proposing a 20-foot backyard for this project, which is actually less than what _%_Bellevue originally started with. She opined it should not be the use of a PD zoning over traditional LDR zoning regulations to solve the issue. As more and more land is sought by developers with more and more wetlands, the density needs to be reduced in order to fit the four homes per acre onto the buildable land.

_%_Ms. _%_Carey wondered how excited the homeowners will be when they learn they are responsible for the ownership and maintenance of _@A1_one _@B1_of the _@C3_two _@F3_entrances _@I1_to _%_Woodland _%_Estates._@J2_ _%_She s_@J2_tated concrete fines are not permanent, so at some point the homeowners will be asked to rebuild that road.

Ms. Carey stated a_%_not_@â2_her is_@ä3_sue is th_@ç1_e 35-foot _@è1_ma_@é1_ximum height o_@ê1_f buildings_@ë1_buildings. _%_She explained_AL3__AO3_ when you put a two-st_AR1_ory home on_AS1_ six feet _AT1_of _AU1_fill, you're getting real close to that 35-foot, which is what is behind her home now. _%_She closed b_AU1_y stating _"_greater density leads to increased traffic, greater risk of stormwater flooding, and lack of administrative oversight of final building following approved plans.

With regard to public participation, no one else in the audience spoke in support or in opposition to Item #28, and public input was closed.

Speaker Request Form was received and filed.

Commissioner Carey submitted ex parte communications (received and filed).

Commissioner _%_Dallari stated he has had discussions with _%_Mr. _%_Madden in the past regarding elevation. He asked _%_Mr. _%_Madden how that will all work out because they have had some issues with it. _%_Mr. _%_Madden answered as far as the fill on the site that _%_Ms. _%_Carey referred to, they are at a zoning stage so they haven't done final engineering plans yet. _%_He explained there is a possibility of some fill on the lots, which is normal in an area where you have high groundwater. _%_Commissioner _%_Dallari clarified they have had issues in some locations where the sheet flow of the yards north to south and east to west didn't actually happen because the elevation changed. _%_He asked how that would be addressed during construction. _%_Mr. _%_Madden _Aã1_answered in this particular situation as far as the drainage goes,_B;1__B<1__B=1__B>1__B?1__B@1__BA2__BC1__BD2_ they are _BF3_pretty much surrounded _BI2__BK1__BL1_on the _BM1_east _BN1_by _BO1_wet_BP1_lands_BQ1_._BR1__BS1__BT1__BU1_ _%_Other _BV1_than _BW1_where they _BX1_have _BY1_tie_BZ1_-in _B[1_slopes _B\1_where they _B]1_have _B^1_to _B_1_tie _B`1_back _Ba1_to _Bb2_existing _Bd1_grade_Be1_, wherever _Bf1_the _Bg1_fill _Bh1_is, _Bi1_everything _Bj1_else _Bk2_goes _Bm1_to the _Bn1_retention pond_Bo1__Bp1__Bq1_ so _Br2_that it_Bt2__Bv1_ is treated before _Bw1_it discharges into the wetland system. As _B‚1_far _Bƒ1_as _B„1_any _B…1_f_B…1_ill _B†1__B‡1_where the _Bˆ1_tie_B‰1_-in _BŠ1_slopes _B‹1_are_BŒ1_, _B�1__BŽ1_if you _B�1_look _B�1_at _B‘1_the_B’1_ cross _B“1_section_B”1__B•1__B–2__B˜1__B™2__B›1__Bœ1_, there are supposed to be swells on both sides of the dirt road. _%_Over the years as they have maintained that road, dirt just gets pushed around so there are areas where the ditch is blocked r_Bº1__Bº1_ight now and _B»2_they are _B½1_going _B¾1_to _B¿1_clean _BÀ1__BÁ1_that _BÂ1_up_BÃ1_. _%_He noted that is one of the things that the neighbors down _BÄ1_on _BÅ1__#_Fawn _BÆ1__#_Run _BÇ2_had asked _BÉ1_them _BÊ1_to do_BË1_,_BÌ1_ and several _BÎ1_of _BÏ1_them _BÐ1_were _BÑ1_present _BÒ1__BÓ1_for the _BÔ2__B×1_P_BØ1_&_BÙ1_Z hearing _BÚ1_and were supportive.

Commissioner _%_Ca_BÞ1__Bß3__Bâ1_rey asked w_C51_ho would maintain that section of the road. _C51__%_Mr. _%_Madden _C61_responded the land_C71_ is actually a separate parcel of land with an easement that goes through it. _#_If you look at the maps, _C81__C91__C:2__C<1__C=1__C>1__C?1__C@1__CA1__CB1__CC1__CD1__CE2__CG2__CI1__CJ1__CK1__CL1__CM1__CN1__CO1__CP1__CQ1__CR1__CS1__CT1__CU1__CV1__CW1__CX1__CY2__C[1__C\1__C]2__C_1__C`1__Ca1__Cb1__Cc1__Cd1__Ce1__Cf1__Cg1__Ch2__Cj1__Ck1__Cl1__Cm1__Cn1__Co2__Cq1__Cr1__Cs2__Cu1__Cv1__Cw1__Cx1__Cy2__C{1__C|2__C~1__C1__C€1__C�1__C‚1__Cƒ1__C„1__C…1__C†1__C‡1__Cˆ1__C‰1__CŠ1__C‹1__CŒ1__C�1__CŽ2__C�2_there_CŸ1__C 1_ are places _C¡1_where _C¢1_one _C£1_land_C¤1_own_C¥1_er _C¦1_will _C§1_own _C¨1_half _C©1_of _Cª1_t_C«1__C«1_he easement, _C¬1_so a _C1_lot _C®1_of _C¯1_these _C°1_land_C±1_o_C²1__C³1_wners own _C´1_the_Cµ1_ whole _C¶2_70_C¸1_ feet and _C¹1_the _Cº2_others _C¼1_just _C½1_have _C¾1_rights _C¿1_to the _CÀ2_easement_CÂ1_. _CÃ1__#__CÈ2_There_CÊ2_'s probably 50 owners of the actual fee-simple land where the _%_Fawn _%_Run easemen_CÊ2_t is. _%_Mr. _%_Madden explained_%_ _Cå1_one _Cæ1_of the _Cç2_things _Cé1_that _Cê1_they _Cë1_tr_Cì1_ied to do_Cí1__Cî1__Cï1__Cð1_ is quit claim the residents the land, improve it and then give it back to the residents; and that would work_Cñ1_ _D<1_great _D=1_if _D>1_they _D?1_had _D@1_a_DA1_ mandatory H_DB1_O_DC1_A _DD1__DE1__DF1__DG1__DH1__DI1__DJ1__DK1__DL1_that _DM1_they _DN1_could _DO1_have _DP1_just _DQ2_taken _DS1_the_DT1_ land _DU1_and _DV1_now _DW1_it _DX1_becomes _DY1_part _DZ1_of _D[1_their _D\1_road _D]1_tract_D^1_. _D_4_Unfortunately _Dc2_there_De1_ are 50 _Df2_different_Dh1__Di1__Dj1_ owners of the _Dk1_road _Dl1_tract _Dm1_and _Dn1_nobody _Do1_was _Dp1_will_Dq1_ing _Dr1_to take _Ds1_the _Dt1_land_Du1__Dv1__Dw1__Dx1__Dy1__Dz2__D|1__D}1__D~1__D2__D�1__D‚1_.

Commissioner _%_Carey asked if the proposal is that they are going_%__DÑ1__DÑ1__DÒ1__DÓ1_ to stabilize it, clean it up, build the structure and that it's a gift to the voluntary _%_HOA, or is it that they are going to stabilize it, clean it up, build the entrance feature, and the new _%_HOA is going to be responsible for maintaining that portion of the easement. Mr. _%_Madden _EU1__EU1_answered _"_the new _EV1_H_EW1_O_EX1_A _EY1_will _EZ1_fit _E[1_in _E\1_to the _E]1_private _E^1_maintenance of t_E_1__E`1__Ea1_he _Eb1_road _Ec1_as _Ed2_it's _Ef2_working _Eh1_today_Ei1__Ej1_ and they are _Ek1__El1_legal_Em1__En1_ly responsible _Eo1_for _Ep1_tha_Ep1_t _Eq1_part _Er1_of _Es1__#_Fawn _Et1__#_Run_Eu1__Ev1__Ew1__Ex1__Ey1__Ez1_._E{1__E|2__E~1__E2__E�1__E‚1__Eƒ1__E„2__E†1__E‡1__Eˆ1__E‰1__EŠ2__EŒ1__E�1__EŽ1__E�1__E�1__E‘2__E“1__E”1__E•1__E–1__E—1__E˜1__E™1__Eš1__E›1__%__Eœ1__E�2__EŸ1__E 1__E¡1__E¢1__E£1__E¤1__E¥1__E¦2__E¨1__E©1__Eª1__E«1__E¬1_ _E1__%_ Commissioner _%_Carey discussed the voluntary _%_HOA in her community. _FA1__%_She c_FA1_onfirmed with _%_Mr. _%_Madden that he is_%_ proposing to build the entrance that is not an_%_ access for the new subdivision, the easement just happens to be on the edge of the subject property. _%_Commissioner _%_Carey asked again whether_%_whether it is his intent to build the entrance and gift that to the voluntary _%_HOA for them to maintain from that _F‘1_point _F’1_for_F“1_ward, or _F”1_is _F•1_it _F–1_going _F—1_to be _F˜1_part_F™3_ of _Fœ1_the new HOA’s covenants and restrictions and is something they are going to have to maintain. Mr. _%_Madden answered they_%_ are going to have it in t_Fœ1_heir covenants and restrictions that t_Fœ1_hey have to maintain it. _%_Commissioner _%_Carey confirmed with _%_Mr. _%_Madden that is _"_only for the length of t_Fœ1_heir piece of land_FÈ1_. She_FÉ2__%_ inquired how it_%_ is going to be documented. _%_Mr._%_ _%_Madden answered _"_it_FË1_ is going _FÌ1_to be _FÍ2_documented _FÏ1_in _FÐ1_the _FÑ1_H_FÒ1_O_FÓ1_A _FÔ2_doc_FÖ1_uments. _%_Mr. _%_Madden confirmed for_%_ _%_Commissioner _%_Dallari that he is_%_ committing to put that into the _%_HOA documents.

_%_Commissioner _%_Dallari stated in looking at the densities, it is below the density that is around that area;_FÖ1_ it is compatible for _%_LDR; the road issue has been cleared up; and the _%_HOA is committing to _%_Mr. _%_Madden to maintain that road.

Motion by Commissioner Dallari, seconded by Commissioner Carey, to adopt Ordinance #2017-33 enacting a Rezone from A-1 (Agriculture) to PD (Planned Development); and approve the associated Development Order and Master Development Plan for a 32-lot, single-family residential subdivision on approximately 21.61 acres, located on the east side of Old Lockwood Road, approximately 300 feet north of Brickell Place, as described in the proof of publication; Raymond Harrison, Applicant.

Districts 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 voted AYE.

-------

Chairman Horan recessed the meeting at 2:55 p.m.; reconvening at 3:00 p.m.

SEMINOLE MASONRY ADDITION REZONE/

Seminole Land Management, LLC

Agenda Item #29 – PH-2017-0029

Proof of publication calling for a public hearing to consider a Rezone from A-1 (Agriculture) to M-1 (Industrial) for an addition to the existing Seminole Masonry on approximately 8.96 acres, located on the west side of E. Lake Mary Boulevard, approximately one-half mile south of E. SR 46, Seminole Land Management, LLC, received and filed.

Matt Davidson, Planning & Development, reviewed the Item as outlined in the Agenda Memorandum. He stated the current hours of operation for the business office are from 8:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, with delivery hours from 7:00 a.m. to 3:00 p.m., Monday through Friday. He added staff recommends the Board approve the rezone.

Charlie Madden, Madden Moorehead & Stokes, Inc., addressed the Board and stated he is available if the Board has any questions.

With regard to public participation, no one in the audience spoke in support or in opposition to Item #29, and public input was closed.

Motion by Commissioner Carey, seconded by Commissioner Dallari, to adopt Ordinance #2017-34 enacting a Rezone from A-1 (Agriculture) to M-1 (Industrial) for an addition to the existing Seminole Masonry on approximately 8.96 acres, located on the west side of E. Lake Mary Boulevard, approximately one-half mile south of E. SR 46, as described in the proof of publication; Seminole Land Management, LLC, Applicant.

Districts 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 voted AYE.

INTERNATIONAL PARKWAY MEDICAL CENTER PD

MAJOR AMENDMENT AND REZONE/George Huddleston

Agenda Item #30 – PH-2017-0243

Proof of publication calling for a public hearing to consider a Rezone from PD (Planned Development) to PD (Planned Development), on 28.34 acres, for a free-standing emergency room (FSER) and other various uses; located on the east side of International Parkway, one-half mile south of W. SR 46, received and filed.

Joy Giles, Planning & Development, addressed the Board and reviewed the Item as outlined in the Agenda Memorandum. She pointed out the Planning & Zoning Commission met on August 2 and voted unanimously to recommend approval of the request with two modifications. The first is to modify the Development Order to include the following condition of approval as requested by the Applicant: construction of Phase 1 (including a maximum 20,000 square foot FSER and a master stormwater system) shall constitute substantial development for the Planned Development. The second modification to the Development Order is to include the following condition of approval as requested by citizen Blaine Darrah: if in the event that Phase 2 of the development proposal does not include a hospital, this would constitute a substantial change to the overall intent of the Planned Development and would require a PD Major Amendment to be approved by the Board. Ms. Giles stated these modifications have not been incorporated into the Development Order that staff has brought forward today. Staff recommends the Board approve this item.

Randy Morris, RM Strategies, Inc., addressed the Board and noted he represents the Applicant. Mr. Morris stated working with the community has been outstanding. He explained _"_this _Hr2_project is the _Hu1__#__Hv1_old _%_Rockefeller _%_PD site_Hw1__Hx1__Hy1__Hz1_ _H{1_that _H|1__H}1_the _%_Board approved a little over eight years ago. Mr. _%_Morris displayed a _%_PowerPoint presentation entitled _%_"International _%_Parkway Medical _%_Center _%_PD" (received and filed) and reviewed _%_Project _%_Area and _%_Wekiva _%_Parkway. _Há1__Há1__%_He stated the _%_Wekiva _%_Parkway project _Hâ2__Hä1_is _Hå1__Hæ1_virtually _Hç4_simultaneous _Hë1_with this project in _Hì1_terms _Hí1_of _Hî1_a _Hï1_time_Hð1_line _Hñ1_going _Hò1_forward_Hó1__Hô1__Hõ1__Hö1_. _#_In December _H÷2_of this _Hù1_year_Hú1_, the DOT _Hû1_will _Hü2_issue _I"1_their _I#1_R_I$1_F_I%1_P _I&1_for _I'2_design-_I)1__I)1_build _I*1_for _I+1_this _I,1_section_I-1__I.1__I/1__I01__I11__I21__I31__I41__I51__I61__I71__I81__I91__I:3__I=1__I>1__I?2__IA3__ID1__IE1_, and t_IF1_hat _IG2_design_II1_-build then would _IJ1_be _IK1_a_IL2_warded _IN1_probably in _IO1_September _IP1_of _IQ1_next _IR1_year, _IS1__IT1_with _IU1_construction _IV2_to be completed in late 2021_IX1_. Mr. Morris noted the hospital_I”1_'s visibility_I•1_ will be _I–1_from _I—1_both _I˜1_of the_I™2_ major _I›3_arterials_Iž1_.

Mr. _%_Morris stated _"_this _I 1_is _I¡1_a _I¢1__%_HIP-TI_I£1__I¤1_ (_%_High _%_Intensity _%_Planned _%_Development - _%_Target _%_Industry_I¥3_) and Rockefeller _I¨1__I©1__Iª1__I«1__I¬1_had the _I1_same _I®2_zoning_I°1_. _I±1__%_T_I±1_he request is_I²1__I³1__I´1_ _Iµ1_a _I¶1_P_I·1_D _I¸1_for _I¹1_a P_Iº1_D_I»1_. _#_The_I¼3_ Rockefeller _%_PD _I¿1_ex_IÀ2_pired _IÂ1_in _IÃ1__#_J_IÄ1_anuary_IÅ1_, and it _IÆ1_never _IÇ1_was _IÈ2_acted _IÊ1_upon_IË1_ or_IÌ1__IÍ1_ _IÎ1_built _IÏ1_upon_IÐ1_. _#_They _IÑ1_even did _IÒ1_final _IÓ4_engineering _I×1_on _IØ1_it _IÙ1_and _IÚ1_never _IÛ2_move_IÝ1_d forward_IÞ1_. _Iß3__%_He explained the _"_surrounding _Iâ1_property _Iã1_on the _Iä1_east_Iå1__Iæ1__Iç1__Iè1__Ié2__Ië1__Iì1__Ií1__Iî1__Iï1__Ið1__Iñ1__Iò1__Ió1_, west_Iô1_, north_Iõ1_, and south _Iö3_all _Iù1_have _Iú1__%_HIP-TI;_Iû1__Iü1_ and he noted _"_there is a _%_PD directly across the street _J!1_that _J"1__J#1__J$1__J%1_the _%_Board has had multi_J&1_ple _J'2_changes _J)1_to _J*1_and made multiple zoning changes to over the _J+1_last _J,1_number _J-1_of _J.1_years_J/1_. _J03__%_HeHe reviewed the HIP-TI slide.

Mr. _%_Morris stated he is before the _%_Board today to ask_J31_ for _%_Phase 1_%_1 of a development and for complete _%_PD approval. _%__%_Phase 1_%_1 approval is for a 20,000-square-foot FSER and they also have additional uses in terms of the _%_PD which all relate to a medical center. _%_He noted usually they d_J31_o cont_Jg1_ract purchases to get zoning and then go forward with the closing for the property, but this property was purchased in _%_October a year ago.

Wendy _%_Brandon, _%_CEO of _%_Central _%_Florida Regional _%_Hospital,_%__%_ addressed the _%_Board and discussed her organization. _%_She stated when you l_%_ook at hospital operations,_%_ the most important front door to a hospital is the emergency department. _%__#_More than 72,000 people entered their hospital_%_the through the emergency department last year,_Jg1_ and only 20% of those patients actually needed hospital admission. Ms. _%_Brandon explained _"_last _L%1_fall _L&1_they _L'3_purchased _L*1_the 28 _L+1__L,1_acres _L-1_that _L.1__L/1_the _%_Board has _L01_before _L11__L21_them today_L31__L41__L52__L71_ with _L81_an _L91_eye _L:1_for the _L;2_future_L=1_. _%_T_L=1_hey _L>1_know _L?1_that _L@1_the _LA1_current _LB1_site _LC1_someday _LE1_will _LF1_be _LG1_out_LH1_grown_LI1_, but _LJ1_they _LK1_also _LL1_know _LM1_that _LN1_today _LO1__LP1__LQ1__LR1_they _LS1_need _LT1_more _LU2_access _LW1_in _LX1__LY1_the community _LZ1_to _L[3_emergency _L^1_care_L_1_. _L`1__La1__%_The count_Lb1_y _Lc1_is _Ld2_growing _Lf1_and _Lg3_predicted _Lj1_to _Lk1_grow _Ll1_at _Lm1_an _Ln1_ev_Lo1_en _Lp2_higher _Lr1_rate _Ls1_in the _Lt1__Lu3_coming _Lx1_year_Ly1_s; and so in the short term, they _Lz1_plan _L{1_to _L|1_use this property to build _L}1_a _L~1_12-_L1_bed _L€1_e_L�2_mergency _Lƒ2_department_L…1_, and _L†1__L‡1_from there _Lˆ1_when the _L‰1_time _LŠ1_is _L‹1_right_LŒ1_, they_L�1_ plan _LŽ1_to _L�1_a_L�1_dd a _L‘1_hospital_L’1_. _L“1__%_She stated she has _L”1_no _L•1_idea _L–1_when the _L—1_time _L˜1_will _L™3_be _Lœ1_right_L�1_, and _Lž1__LŸ1_she does _L 1_not _L¡1_have _L¢2_funding _L¤1_to do _L¥1_that _L¦3_tod_L©1_ay nor _Lª3_do_L1_es she _L®1_have _L¯1_approval from the _%_State of _%_Florida to do that. _%_It would require a _#_Certificate o_#_of _L°1__#_Need _L±2__%_(CON) approval_L³1_. _#_But _L´1_today she is_Lµ1__L¶1__L·3_ prepared _Lº1_to _L»1_mov_L¼1_e forward with a _L½1__L¾1__L¿1_12_LÀ1_-bed _LÁ3_emergency _LÄ2_department_LÆ2_. _%_Ms. _%_Brandon noted _"_they ha_#_ve _LÈ1_already _LÉ1_start_LÊ5__LÏ1_ed the _LÐ2_planning _LÒ1_process _LÓ1_with the _LÔ1__#_Count_LÕ1_y_LÖ1_ by submitting their engineering plans.

Mr. _%_Morris _Lô1__Lõ1__Lö1__L÷1__Lø1__Lù1__Lú2__Lü1__#__M!1__M"1_reviewed _%_Previous _%_Approval: _%_Rockefeller _%_PUD. _%_He stated _%_Rockefeller was a _%_FAR _%_(Floor _%_Area _%_Ratio) of_%__%__M]1_ 1.0. _%_T_M|1_hey _M}1_kept _M~1_the _M1_same _M€1_F_M�1_A_M‚1_R _Mƒ1_as _M„3_Rockefeller _M‡1_ev_Mˆ1_en _M‰1_though _MŠ1__M‹1__MŒ2_the _%_Board_%_ changed _MŽ1_the_M�1_ code _M�1__M‘1__M’1__M“1_a little over a year ago to _M”1_one _M•1_1.5 _%_FAR_M–1__M—1__M˜1__M™1__Mš3_._M�3_ _%_They _M¿1_also _MÀ1__MÁ1__MÂ1__MÃ1__MÄ1__MÅ1_kept _MÆ1_the _MÇ1_tran_MÈ2_sportation _MÊ1_trip _MË1_counts _MÌ1_low_MÍ1_; and _MÎ1__MÏ1_in _MÐ1_terms _MÑ1_of _MÒ1_that_MÓ1_, _MÔ1_the _MÕ1__MÖ1_usage _M×1_on _%_I_MÙ1_nternational _%_Parkway _MÚ1__MÛ1_right _MÜ1_now _MÝ1_is _MÞ1__Mß1_around _Mà2_17,000 _Mâ1_trips. _Mã1__#_The _Mä1_road_Må1_way _Mæ1_is _Mç2_constructed _Mé1_to _Mê2_handle _Mì2_35,000 _Mî1_trips_Mï1_. _%__%__Mð1__Mñ1__Mò1__Mó1__Mô5_The _Mù1_ingress/egress is both on _%_International _%_Parkway and _%_Wilson _%_Road. Mr. _%_Morris stated there w_Mù1_as a transportation analysis done. _%_It wasn't a _NK1_full_NL1_-blown _NM1_stud_NN1_y _NO1_because _NP1_facilities up to 20,000 square feet, like the FSER, have such a low _NZ1_im_N[1_pact _N\1_on the _N]1_road_N^1_way_N_1_ that it_N`2_ doesn't _Nb1_de_Nc1_mand_Nd1_ a _Ne1_fu_Nf2_ll traffic _Nh1_stud_Ni1_y_Nj1_. _Nk1_A _Nl1_fu_Nm2_ll traffic _No1_stud_Np1_y _Nq1_w_Nr1_ill come _Ns1_whe_Nt1_n t_Nt1_hey _Nu1_go _Nv1_to _Nw1__#_Phase _Nx1_2 _Ny1_and _Nz1_develop _N{1_a _N|1_hospital _N}1_or _N~2_medical _N€1_office _N�1_or _N‚1_re_Nƒ1_tail_N„1_.

George Huddleston, Principal Engineer for S&ME, Inc., a_NÁ2_ddressed the _%_Board and stated _NÃ1__NÄ1__NÅ1__NÆ1__NÇ2__NÉ1__NÊ1__NË2_per the community meeting _NÍ2__NÏ1__NÐ1_held _NÑ1_on the _NÒ1_18th, _NÓ1_there _NÔ1_were _NÕ1_three _NÖ2_major _NØ1_take_NÙ1_a_NÚ2_ways _NÜ1_that were driving community concern and it was _NÝ2_largely _Nß1_to do _Nà1_with _Ná4_buffering _Nå1_of the _Næ1_development _Nç1_and _Nè1_specif_Né1_ically the _Nê3__Ní1__Nî1_location _Nï1_of the _Nð1__%_FSER_Nñ2__Nó1__Nô1__Nõ1_ and the _Nö1_helipad_N÷1__Nø1_. _%_Mr. _%_Huddleston explained _"_in the _Nù1_in_Nú1_itial _Nû1_concept plans that were drafted, the hospital was _Nü2_tucked _O"1_more _O#1_to the _O$1_north_O%1_ern _O&1_corn_O'1_er _O(1_of the _O)1_site; _O*1_and _O+1_it left _O,1_the_O-1_ emergency room _O11_along _O21_the_O31_ west_O41_ern _O51_portion _O61_of the _O71_site, _O81_right along _%_International _%_Parkway. _%_The helipads are always directly adjacent to the emergency room,_OB1_ _OC1_so _OD1_it _OE1__OE1_left _OF1_the _OG2_helipad _OI1_very _OJ3_prominently _OM1_located on _ON1__%_International _%_Parkway. _%_They went back to the _OO1__OP1__OQ1__OR1__OS2__OU1__OV2__OX1__OY1__OZ1_drawing board, relocated the building completely, mirrored i_O[1_t and put _O\1_it _O]1_in the _O^2_southeastern_O`1_ _Oa1_portion _Ob1_of the _Oc1_site_Od1_, _Oe1__Of1_which is the_Og1_ _Oh1_site _Oi1_plan _Oj1__Ok1_in front _Ol1_of _Om1__On1_the _%_Board_%_. _Oo1__%_He stated the _"_main _Op1_reason _Oq1_in _Or1_doing _Os1_that _Ot1_is _Ou1_to _Ov1_get _Ow1_the_Ox1_ _%_FSER_Oy2__O{1__O|1_ _O}1_and _O~2_the helipad_O€1__O�2_ as tucked _Oƒ1_a_O„1_way _O…1_as _O†1_they _O‡1_could_Oˆ1_. _O‰1__%_He pointed out the _OŠ1__O‹1__OŒ1__O�1__OŽ1__O�1__O�1__O�1__O‘1__O’1__O“1__O”2__O–1_restricted zone _O—1_on the _%_Master _%_Development _%_Plan slide that _O˜1__O™2_they have committed _O›1_to through the _Oœ1__%_Master _%_Development _%_Plan and through the _%_Development _%_Order as the _%__O§3_restricted _Oª1_area _O«1_for the _O¬1_location _O3_of the _O°1__%_FSER_O±2_ and the _%_helipad.

_O³1_ _%_Mr. _%_Huddleston reviewed _%_Requested _%_Zoning-PD_O´1__Oõ3__Oø1__Où1__Oú1_. _%_He referred again to the _%_Master _%_Development _%_Plan slide and stated they are trying to put the _%_FSER _%_in the most isolated portion of the site. _%_He explained the helicopter operations will largely use _%_I-4 as their primary approach corridor, so this locates the helipad in that corner of the site really trying to minimize any disturbance to neighbors in the vicinity. _%_One other thing he pointed out on the _%_site plan is that once they plant the flag for the FS_%_ER, they are also dictating where the hospital would sit and that's the outline extending a little bit beyond the _%_FSER outline. _#_The northern portion of the property would be used largely for surface parking, potentially some of those ancillary uses like a medical office building or something of the sort, but the largest, highest intensity component of this project would be in the south_P"1_eastern corner of the site.

In regard to _%_the _%_FSER restriction zone, _%_Mr. _%_Huddleston stated it is a 260-foot setback from _%_International _%_Parkway and they have already submitted final engineering plans for staff's review. _%_The location of the _%_FSER would be about 370 feet from _%_International _#_Parkway_Q51_; and _Q61_whe_Q72_n looking _Q91_at _Q:1_the_Q;3_ Savannah _Q>1__%_Park _Q?1_town_Q@2_homes _QB1_across _QC1_the_QD1_ street_QE2_, it's _QG1_almost _QH4_650_QL1_ feet of _QM2_separation _QO1_between _QP1_the _QQ2_uses_QS1_.

Mr. _%_Morris stated he concurs with s_%_taff's recommendation with the two changes. _%_They have discussed it with staff and also thoroughly at the _%_P&Z meeting_%_meeting. _%_He asked the _%_Board to put the two changes in their motion for incorporation into the _%_Development _%_Or_Q”1_der. _%_H_Q”1_e explained the changes came out of discussions with _%_Heathrow representatives and their _%_Board of _%_Directors, and also _%_Lake _%_Forest and their _%_Board of _%_Directors. _%_M_Q”1_r. _%_Morris discussed the local emergency rooms and stated _Qç1_there _Qè1_are _Qé2_currently _Që1__Qì1__Qí1__Qî1_two emergency rooms_%_emergency room in the area, and this _Qï1_would _Qð1_be_Qñ1_ the third_Qò1_. _%_However, the _Qù2_issue _Qû1_be_Qü1_came_R!1_ _R31_would _R41_the_R51_ hospital _R61_get _R71_buil_R81_t. _#__R91_H_R:1_C_R;1_A _R<1_is _R=1_not _R>1_a _R?2_developer _RA1_of _RB1_general _RC1_development_RD1_, they _RE1_are _RF1_a developer of _RG1_hospital _RH1_prop_RI1_ert_RJ1_ies _RK1_and _RL1_they _RM1_are _RN2_looking _RP1_at _RQ1_a _RR2_campus _RT1_here_RU1_. _%_M_R1_r. _%_Morris explained there are two _R€2_phases_R‚1__Rƒ1_. _R„1_The _R…1_first _R†1_phase _R‡1_is the FS_Rˆ1_E_R‰1_R _RŠ1_that is _R‹3__RŽ1_before the _%_Board today_R�2__R‘3__R”1_; up _R•1_to _R–1_2_R—1_0,000 square _R˜1_feet_R™1_ with 11,000 square feet constructed soon_R¡2_. _R£1__R¤2__R¦1__R§1__#_That _R¨1_could _R©1_be _Rª1_ex_R«2_panded _R1_to _R®2_20,000 _R°1_square _R±1_feet _R²3_within P_#_phase 1_Rµ1__R¶1__R·1_, and they are asking for approval of that. _%_Phase 2 would include the additional uses for the property. _R¾1__R¿1__RÀ1__RÁ1__RÂ1__RÃ1__RÄ1__RÅ1__RÆ1__RÇ2__RÉ1__RÊ2__RÌ1__RÍ1__RÎ1__RÏ1__RÐ1_If _RÑ1__RÒ1_a _RÓ1_hospital _RÔ1_is _RÕ1_not _RÖ1_brought _R×1_back _RØ1_in P_RÙ1__#_pphase 2 _RÛ1_and _RÜ2_addition_RÞ1_al _Rß1_development _Rà1_is_Rá1_, then this _Râ1_would _Rã1__Rä1__Rå1__Ræ1_go back through a p_#_public h_#_hhearing cycle as _Rç1_a _Rè1_site _Ré1_plan _Rê1_change _Rë1_in essence. _#__Rì2_It's _Rî1_a _Rï1_concurrent commitment_#_ in advance.

Mr. _%_Morris stated if a property isn't developed in eight years, it has the potential to lose its zoning if there is_%_ no activity. _SJ1_ _%_He had previously _SK1_ask_SL1_ed _SM1_staff_SN1_, and _SO1_they _SP3_opined_SS1_ that the_SY1_ FS_%_E_SZ1__S[2_R facility _S]1_is _S^1_a _S_1_substantial _S`1__Sa1_start_Sb1_ of _Sc1_the _Sd2_project_Sf1__Sg1_. _%_He pointed out t_Sg1_here has never been a project in the county that has had any type of development occur where their zoning was taken away.

Mr. _%_Morris explained _"_this _SÊ1_is _SË1_a _SÌ2_purchase _SÎ1_of _SÏ1_$10 _SÐ1_million _SÔ1_for the _SÕ3_Rockefeller _SØ1__SÙ1_property_SÚ1__SÛ1__SÜ3__Sß1__Sà1__Sá1_, and _Sâ1_then _Sã1__Sä1_$12 million for the FS_%_ER they are _Sî2_building_Sð2_. _%_He asked the _%_Board to declare that substantial s_S÷1_o that there will not be any question in the future about the zoning and the ability to _T21_hold _T31_the _T42_zoning _T61_that _T71_the _%_Board may approve_T81__T91__T:2__T<1__T=1_ today_T>1_. _T?1__%_He n_T?1_oted _TR1_it _TS1_took _TT1_20 _TU1_years _TV1_to _TW1_get _TX1_a _TY1_hospital _TZ1_in _T[3__#_Oviedo_T^1__T_1__T`1__Ta1__Tb1__Tc1__Td1__Te1__Tf1_. _Tg1__%_T_Tg1_hey _Th1_know _Ti2_how long _Tk1_the_Tl1_ process takes. _Tm2__To1__Tp1__%_The issue here is that _Tq1_to b_Tq1_uild a hospital,_Tz1_ _T{1_you _T|1_have _T}1_to have a _T~1__%_Certificate of _%_Need (C_T1_O_T€1_N_T�1_). _#_The _T‡1_current _Tˆ2_facility _TŠ1_at _%_Central _%_Florida _%_Hospital in _%_Sanford has one now. _%_ _%_T_TŠ1_hey may transfer or expand_T”1__T•1_; but what_T–1_ever _T—1_they _T˜1_do_T™1_, they have to get approval from _%_Tallahassee. _%_But before they do that, they are going to have to raise the funds, show the need, and figure out all of the aspects of what they are doing with the current facility versus the new facility. _%_So for those reasons, they are saying under no conditions can they guarantee the community or the _%_Board that in eight years the hospital will come to fruition. _%_He stated that is the purpose of the _%_D.O. request and that is the reason they are asking for the specific language_T™1_.

Mr. _%_Morris reviewed Project Rezoning Timeline. In regard to I_"_IItem _%_S in the _%_Development _%_Order which _%_refers to off-street parking, _%_Mr. _%_Morris explained that parking requirement could theoretically occur_V?1_ on _%_Wilson _%_Road. _%_He_%_ confirmed they will not have parked cars on _%_International _#_Parkway. _V�1_ _%_In regard to Item _%_T which refers to _%_LYNX, _%_Mr. _%_Morris stated at _V™1_some _Vš2_future _Vœ1_point _V�2_they will _VŸ1_look _V 1_to _V¡1_connectivity with _%_LYNX_V¢1__V£1__V¤1_ and _%_SunRail. _#_This _V¥1_would be _V¦1__V§1_in the _V¨1_future_V©1_ _Vª1_when P_#_pphase 2_V«1__V¬1__V1__V®1__V¯1__V°1_ would come forward.

_%__%__VÂ2__VÄ1__VÅ1_Mr. _%_Morris stated the_VÆ2_ members _VÈ1_from _VÉ1__#_Lake _VÊ2__#_Forest_VÌ1__VÍ2_ raised _VÏ1__VÐ2__VÒ1__VÓ1__VÔ1__VÕ1__VÖ1__V×1__VØ1__VÙ1_an issue regarding outside _VÚ1_way _VÛ1_station_VÜ1_s for _VÝ1_people _VÞ1_waiting at the FSER, or at the _Vß1_hospital _Và2_later, _Vâ1_that _Vã1_would _Vä1_not _Vå1_be _Væ3_congesting _Vé1_the_Vê3_ emergency room _Vî1_itself_Vï1_. _Vð1__%_He said they would agree to do that, but he doesn't _Vü1_think _W!1_it needs to go in the _%_D.O. because it's in the plan they are submitting, which is that there will be a covered awning outside the FSER with benches underneath.

Blaine _%_Darrah, 1624 _%_Cherry _%_Ridge _%_Drive, addressed the _%_Board and stated he is_%_ a member of the _%_Heathrow _%_Master _%_Board and _%_represents the _%_Heathrow _%_Homeowners _%_Association. _%__%__WX1_He explained_WY1_ t_#_he _WZ1_information _W[1_that _W\2__W^1__W_1_flowed through the _W`1__#_Commission _Wa1_in _Wb1_all _Wc1_of the _Wd2_early _Wf2_phases _Wh1_did _Wi1_not _Wj1_indicate who the owner of the property was. _%_And then they had a community meeting where Wendy _%_Brandon and her executive team came forward and identified themselves as_%_ the owner of the property. After spending time with Ms. Brandon at the P&Z meeting,_Wk1__Wl1__%_After he became convinced that _X71__X81__%_Ms. _%_Brandon _X91_wants _X:1_to build _X;1_a _X<1_hospital, _X=1_and she has had success building one in _%_Oviedo. _X>1_ _%_Mr. _%_Darrah discussed the condition to the _%_D.O. that he proposed, and h_%_e opined _XÈ2__XÊ1__XË1__XÌ1_a hospital is a super use of that property, especially _XÍ1_where _XÎ5__#_Wekiva _#_Parkway _XÓ1_is _XÔ1_going _XÕ1_to be _XÖ1_coming _X×1_into _XØ1_the _XÙ1_commun_XÚ1_ity. _%_He commented that the drawing that was _%_part of the _%_PowerPoint presentation that indicates where the helipad would be located should be part _YE1_of the _YF2_official _YH4_engineering _YL1_documents _YM1_that _YN1_are _YO1_part _YP1_of the _YQ1_record_YR1_ because _YS1_the_YT1_ one _YU1_that _YV1_is _YW3_submitted _YZ1_with the _Y[1_D._Y\1_O. _Y]2_doesn't _Y_1_show _Y`1_that_Ya1__Yb1_. That_Yc1_ was _Yd1_a _Ye1_crucial_Yf1__Yg1__Yh1_ item of _Yi1_concern _Yj1_t_Yk1__Yl1_o several community members at the community meeting. _%_Mr. _%_Darrah closed by saying he supports this item with_%_ the two modifications presented today.

Grey _%_Wilson, 5255 _%_Shoreline _%_Circle, addressed the _%_Board and stated he_%_ represents the _%_Lake _%_Forest _%_HOA. _%_He explained why _ZX1_t_Zi1_he _%_Board's _Zj1_decision _Zk1__Zl1_is the_Zm2_ least important _Zo2_matter_Zq1_. _#_Over _Zr1_and _Zs1_above _Zt1_everything _Zu1_else_Zv1_, process _Zw1_is _Zx2_paramount_Zz1_. _Z{1__%_He discussed the lack of information _Z˜1__Z™1_the communities received and opined _Zš1_it _Z›2_seemed _Z�1_apparent the matter was _Zž2_mov_Z 1_ing forward rapidly. _%_His committee never took a position for or against the hospital, it took a stance on the process. Mr. Wilson stated t_%_hey_[�1_ would like clarification as to what is meant by "substantial"_%_ r_\'2_egarding _\)1_the_\)1_ _\*2_rezone_\,1_. _%_He e_\,1_xplained d_\,1_ue to t_\,1_he _\42_unique_\61_ness _\71_to _\81_this _\91_particular _\:1_re_\;1_zone _\<1_and the _\=1_nature of building a h_\>1__\?1__\@2__\B1_ospital _\C1_with _\D1_its own threshold requirements,_\D1_ it's _%_Lake _%_Forest’s understanding that the substantial requirement is not applicable beyond this scope.

Luisa _%_Ruiz, 780 _%_Whooping _%_Crane _%_Court, addressed the _%_Board and stated she _%_lives west of _%_I-4 _%_and fully _%_supports an FS_%_ER that is two or three minutes from her house because it really does _\Ñ1_make _\Ò1_a _\Ó2_difference_\Õ1_. _%__%_Ms. _%_Ruiz discussed family members and residents_%_ in her community who h_\ð1_ave used emergency room_%_emergency _\ñ1__\ò1__\ó2__\õ1__\ö1__\÷1__\ø1__\ù1__\ú1__\û1__\ü1__]!1__]"1__]#1__]$1__]%1__]&2__](1__])1__]*1__]+1__],1__]-3__]01__]11__]21__]31__]42__]61__]71__]81__]91__]:1__];1__]<1__]=1__]>1__]?1__]@1__]A1__]B2__]D3__]G1__]H1__]I1__]J1__]K1__]L1__]M1__]N2__]P1__]Q1__]R3__]U2__]W1__]X1__]Y1__]Z2__]\1__]]1__]^1__]_1__]`1__]a1__]b2__]d3__]g1__]h1__]i3__]l2__]n2__]p1__]q1__]r1__]s1__]t1__]u1__]v1__]w1__]x1__]y2__]{1__]|1__]}1__]~1__]1__]€1__]�1__]‚1__]ƒ2__]…1__]†1__]‡2__]‰1__]Š1__]‹1__]Œ1__]�2__]�2__]‘1__]’1__]“1__]”1__]•1__]–1__]—1__]˜1__]™1__]š1__]›1__]œ1__]�2__]Ÿ1__] 1__]¡3__]¤2__]¦1__]§1__]¨1__]©1__]ª1__]«1_ services. _%_One of the problems s_]«1_he sees with emergency rooms is_%_er that they _]«1_are hard to get to due to traffic. _%_They are only_%_ 20 to 30 minutes away but she can assure everyone that that is too late. _%_Minutes are _]×1_what _]Ø2_makes _]Ú1_a _]Û2_difference _]Ý1_in _]Þ1_someone_]ß1_'s _]à1_life_]á1_. _%_She thanked the _%_Board for allowing her to discuss_%_ how it impacts her to have an emergency room two or three minutes from her house. _%_She wished for the _%_Board to approve this item.

George _%_Sellery, 5231 _%_Shoreline _%_Circle, _^d1__^z1_addressed the _%_Board_%_ and stated this is one of the few FS_%_ERs _%_he has ever seen that is on the backend of the property, meaning the hospital is going to go in front of it. _%_Most places would hedge their bets and put their emergency room_%_em right on _%_International _%_Parkway_%__%__%__%__%_. _%_This leads him to think they are seriously pursuing putting the hospital in, so therefore _%_he supports the language they've put forth. _%_He discussed how this is a great project in connection with economic development and high-end jobs. _%_Mr. _%_Sellery talked about ensuring tha_^z1_t the _%_International _%_Parkway corridor is at the same standard of development as it is from _%_CR _%_46A through _%_Lake _%_Mary to _%_Lake _%_Mary _%_Boulevard. _%_He mentioned_%_ _%_Savannah _%_Park, which morphed into apartments with metal carports right on _%_International _%_Parkway, _^z1_and how they h_^z1__%_ave now added buildings in front of that to within a few feet of the sidewalk. _%_He w_%_ants to make sure that when people are coming t_%_o look at this hospital, they don't turn the corner from _%_SR 46 onto _%_International and run by some other development that doesn't complement the rest of _%_International _%_Parkway.__91__`21__%__%_ _`’1__%_Mr. _%_Sellery stated the_%_y_%__`“1_ _`”1_need _`•1_to _`–1_look _`—1_at _`˜1_things _`™1_that _`š1__`›2_invest_`�1_ in _`ž1_that _`Ÿ1_end _` 1_of _`¡1__#_Inter_`¢1_national _`£1__#_Park_`¤1_way _`¥1_and ensure that _`¦3_the _`©1_hospital _`ª2_project_`¬1_ is _`2_supported _`¯1_by _`°1_other _`±1_development_`²1__`³2__`µ1__`¶3__`¹1__`º1__`»1__`¼2__`¾1__`¿1__`À1__`Á1__`Â1__`Ã1__`Ä1__`Å1__%__`Æ1__`Ç1__`È1__`É1__`Ê1__`Ë1__`Ì1__`Í1__`Î1__`Ï1__`Ð1__%_.

Mr. _%_Morris pointed out that this _a[1_is the _a\1_only _a]1_hospital _a^1_in _a_1_Seminole County _a`1_on the _aa1_west_ab1_ern _ac1_side _ad1_of _ae1__af1__%_I-4_ag2_. _%_This is the_ai1__aj1_ only _ak1_hospital _al1_in _am1_Seminole County _an1__ao1_in _ap1_terms _aq1_of the _ar1__as1_primary _at1_hospitals _au3_servicing _ax1_the_ay2_ corridor _a{1_of _a|9__#_Altamonte _#_Springs, _#_Longwood, _#_Sanford and _#_Lake _#_Mary that _a…1_is _a†5_located _a‹1_on _aŒ1_a _a�2_major _a�2_corridor _a‘1__a’1_highway _a“1_and _a”1_also _a•1_on _a–1_a _a—1_second_a˜1_ary highway that's being b_a™1_uilt _aš1__a›1__aœ1_in the _a�1_next _až2_couple _a 1_of _a¡1_years_a¢1_. _a£1__%_He stated another_a¤1__a¥1_ piece _a¦1_of _a§1_information _a¨1__a©1__aª1_is the _%_FDOT 5 _%_Operations _%_Center is being constructed right now to the south and that _%_Operational _%_Center meets the _%_County's _%_HIP_aª1_-TI aspirational goals. _%_It is a government building because it is the technological center for _%_DOT _%_that will control all of their cameras in _%_District 5 and all of their reader boards._aª1_ _%_Mr. _%_Morris added the _aª1__%_Florida _%_Highway _%_Patrol will have vehicles there so they'll be launching them from that center which will actually create better customer service.

_%_Mr. _%_Morris closed by informing the _%_Board that although _%_Mr. _%_Wilson did mention the initial communications issues and forwarding of documents,_%_ _%_he can assure the Board that in the last 60 days, _%_Mr. _%_Wilson has received every public document they have had and any submittal that they have had and they got it to him promptly and on time and _b„1__b…1_re_b†2_viewed _bˆ1_those documents with him. _%_He asked the _%_Board _b“1__b”1__b•1_to _b–2_approve _b˜1_as _b™1_a_bš2_mended _bœ1_the request and _b�1__bž1_thanked them _bŸ1_for _b 1_their _b¡1_consideration_b¢1_.

With regard to public participation, no one else in the audience spoke in support or in opposition to Item #30, and public input was closed.

Speaker Request Forms were received and filed.

Motion by Commissioner Carey, seconded by Commissioner Constantine, to adopt Ordinance #2017-35 enacting a Rezone from PD (Planned Development) to PD (Planned Development), on 28.34 acres, for a free-standing emergency room and other various uses; located on the east side of International Parkway, one-half mile south of W. SR 46, including the following two amendments: (1) Construction of an approximately 11,000-square-foot free-standing emergency room shall constitute substantial development for the PD, and (2) in the event that Phase 2 in the development proposal does not include a hospital, this would constitute a substantial change to the overall intent of the PD and would require a PD Major Amendment to be approved; George Huddleston, Applicant; Development Order.

C_b§1_ommissioner _%_Constantine thanked the citizens _%__bØ1_for _bÙ1_coming _bÚ1_together _bÛ1_and _bÜ2__bÞ1__bß1__bà2_working _bâ1_out_bã1_ the_bä1_ concerns_bå1_. _%_He shared his experience living_bæ1__bç1__bè1__bé1__bê1_ _bë1_across _bì1_the_bí1_ street _bî1_from _bï1_another _bð1_hospital _bñ1_on _bò1_a _bó2_major _bõ1_highway_bö1__b÷1_. _%__%__%_He asked if _%_Commissioner _%_Carey would want to include the _%_comment from _%_Mr. _%_Darrah about the heliport. _%__%_Mr. _%_Morris informed _%_Commissioner _%_C_b÷1_onstantine_co1_ _%_Mr._%_ _%_Darrah's _cp1_comments _cq1_are _cr1__cs3_incorporated _cv1_in the _cw1_staff _cx1_report _cy1_and _cz1_in the _c{1_D._c|1_O_c}1__c~1__c1__c€1__c�1__c‚1__cƒ1__c„1__c…1__c†3__c‰1__cŠ1__c‹1__cŒ1__c�1__cŽ1__c�1__c�1__c‘1__c’1__c“1__c”1__c•1_.

Commissioner _%_Dallar_c¨1__c¿2_i stated Item _%_U in the _%_Development _%_Order says_%_ all_%__cÁ1_ _cÂ2_mechan_cÄ1_ical _cÅ1_e_cÆ2_quipment_cÈ1_, ground or roof-mounted, shall be screened from _cÉ1_off_cÊ1_-site_cË1_ view_cÌ1_. _#_The _cÍ2_construction _cÏ1_of the _cÐ5__#_Wekiva _#_Parkway_cÕ1__cÖ2_ really _cØ3_puts _cÛ1_this _cÜ1_property at_cÜ1_ a disadvantage. _%_He asked staff if they should put in _%_a caveat in the Development Order that excludes the _%_Wekiva _%_Parkway. _%_Ms. _%_Giles _cï1_answered they could make that change to the _%_Development _%_Order. Chairman Horan affirmed the change will be considered part of the motion. The motioner and seconder agreed.

Commissioner Dallari stated he is submitting his ex parte communication and _%_ChairChairman _%_Horan _d°1_disclosed he has had_#_ _d¶1_several _d¸1__d¹1__dº1_c_d»1_ommun_d¼1_icatio_d½1_ns wi_d¾1_th residents and a conversation with _%_Ms._%_ _%_Brandon.

Districts 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 voted AYE.

DISTRICT REPORTS

District 4

Motion by Commissioner Henley, seconded by Commissioner Dallari, to appoint Ben Wheeler to an unexpired term on the Historical Commission.

Districts 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 voted AYE.

-------

Commissioner Henley stated there is also a vacancy that just came open on the Library Committee and he will have an appointment at the next meeting.

District 5

Commissioner _%_Carey _e41_reported _#_on August _e=1_11 _e>1__e?1_there_eA3__eA3_ was a _#_Wekiva _eD1__#_River _eE2__#_Basin _eG1__%_Commission meeting and _%_Mary _%_Brooks, _%_Expressway _%_Authority, gave another excellent update on the _eH5__#_Wekiva _#_Parkway_eM1_. _#_Her _eN3_presentation _eQ1_can be _eR1_s_eS1_een on their website. _%__eu1_They _ev1_also _ew1_made _ex1_sure _ey1_that the _ez1__#_Fish _e{1_and _e|1__#_Wild_e}1_life _%_Conservation_e~1__e1__e€1__e�2_ _eƒ1__#_Commission _e„1_knew _e…1_that _e†1_the_%_y _e‡1_have _eˆ1_a _e‰2_waiting _e‹1_list _eŒ1_for bear-proof _e�1_garb_eŽ1_age _e�1_cans_e�1_. _%__e‘1_The _%_County could _e’1_use _e“1_some _e”1_additional funding. _%_They may have some funding coming available _"_and _e•1_they need to make sure that staff stays on top of that. _%_Ms. _%_Guillet responded staff is _%_already working on that and has made their first delivery of the new round of bear cans.

-------

Commissioner _%_Carey stated_%_ under the report of the _%_St. _%_Johns _%_Water _%_Management _%_District, it was noted that they are going to be accepting their cost-share applications again soon and _e¦1_s_e¦1_he _e§1_wants _e¨1_to _e©1_make _eª1_sure _e«1_that _e¬3_staff _e¯1_is _e°2_aware _e²1_of _e³1_that _e´1_and _eµ2_that t_eµ2_hey are preparing to apply _e·1_for _e¸1_some _e¹1_of those cost_eº1_-share _e»1_opportunities_e¼1__e½1_ through the water management district.

District 3

Commissioner _%_Constantine_eÛ1__eÜ1_ _%__eÝ1_stated in regard to the _%_MPO _#_Transportation _#_Disadvantaged, there was a great deal of discussion concerning delinquent and/or non-paid fees that had tripled over the last couple of years, and the _#_Transportation _#_Disadvantaged community came together with recommendations as to how to change that. _%_He n_eÝ1_oted it_%_ was over $100,000 this past year as it was the year before, which has grown. _%_He explained how people have figured out how to a_eÝ1_buse the system. The members of the _#_Transportation _#_Disadvantaged community were very upset about that, so they put together some recommendations for _%_LYNX which will hopefully stop those delinquent and/_eÝ1_or non-paying rate fares.

-------

Commissioner Constantine commented _%_Commissioner _%_Carey did a great job on the _%_Wekiva _%_River _%_Basin _%_Commission.

District 1

Commissioner _%_Dallari announced he a_eÝ1__%_ttended a community meeting a couple of weeks ago and resident Jailene Warren expressed to him she _fí1_would _fî1_have rather_fï1_ ha_fð1_d an _fñ1_ev_fò1_ening _fó3_meeting so _fö1__f÷1_she _fø1_could _fù1_have _fú1_had _fû1_some _fü2_input _g"1_and she wanted _%_Commissioner _%_Dallari to _g#1_ex_g$1_press _g%1_her _g&1_concern_g'1_s to the _%_Board._g(1_ _%_Ms. _%_Warren _g)2_thinks _g+1_that _g,1_the _%_Board _g-1_should _g.1_have_g/1__g01_ more evening meetings to avail more conversations with the community.

-------

Commissioner Dallari requested an update on the Sanlando appeal from the County Attorney’s Office. Ms. Porter-Carlton replied staff will have that at the next meeting or by memo between now and the next meeting.

CHAIRMAN’S REPORT

Chairman _%_Horan_gi1_ stated he has a _gt1_request _gu1_from _gv1__%_LYNX _gw1__gx1_for a _gy2_letter _g{1_of _g|1_support _g}1_for _g~1_a _g1_grant_g€2_ regarding paratransit. _%_He confirmed for _%_Commissioner _%_Dallari that _%_LYNX is applying for the grant.

Motion by Commissioner Dallari, seconded by Commissioner Carey, to authorize the Chairman to send a letter of support for LYNX for a grant regarding paratransit (received and filed).

Districts 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 voted AYE.

-------

Chairman _%_Horan announced _%_the _%_Orlando _%_Economic Partnership was hosted by the _%_Orlando _%_Marriot _%_Lake _%_Mary on _%_August _gÕ1_16th_gÖ1_. _g×1__%_He stated _"_the _"_board now consists of 146 members of the _%_Economic _%_Partnership and over 70 of those members attended the meeting in _%_Seminole _%_County at the _%_Marriot. _%_The _gâ1__%_Orlando _%_Economic _%_Partnership for the last year has been led by _%_Se_gâ1_an _%_De_gâ1_Martino, former _%_c_gâ1_hairman of the _%_Chamber, and also _%_Robert _%_Yutzy, who is the _%_Economic _%_Development _%_Commission_%_ (EDC) _%_c_gâ1_hairman. _%_They have now finished their year of transition under that structure and the new _%_c_gâ1_hairman coming in from _%_Walt _%_Disney _hB1_is _hC1__%__%_Ken _%_Potrock who will be taking over the helm of that organization._hD1__hE3__hH4__hL1__hM1__hN3_ _hQ1__%_C_hd1_hairman _%_Horan stated staff at the _%_Marriot did a great job.

COMMUNICATIONS AND/OR REPORTS

The following Communications and/or Reports were received and filed:

1. Letter dated August 7, 2017, from John Londot, of Greenberg Traurig, to Seminole County Board of County Commissioners re: Amendments to Seminole County Administrative Code/Seminole County Investment Policy.

2. Letter dated August 8, 2017, from Laura Kelley, Executive Director, Central Florida Expressway Authority, to Chairman Horan re: State Road 417 Widening from N. Econlockhatchee Trail to the Seminole County Line (Project No.: 417-134) Sound Wall/Preconstruction Community Information Meeting to be held Tuesday, August 29, 2017, in the cafeteria at Arbor Ridge School, 2900 Logandale Dr., Orlando, from 5:00 p.m. to 7:00 p.m.

3. Letter dated August 11, 2017, from Roderick Henderson, Business Manager, The Foundation of Seminole County Public Schools, to Board of County Commissioners, thanking the Commission for the donation of $279.50.

4. Letter dated August 11, 2017, from Roderick Henderson, Business Manager, The Foundation of Seminole County Public Schools, to Board of County Commissioners, thanking the Commission for the donation of $175.

5. Letter dated August 13, 2017, from Gilmore E. Daniel, Jr., to Chairman Horan re: pit bulls.

COUNTY MANAGER’S REPORT

M_hd1_s. _%_Guillet asked how the _%_Board would like to handle the follow-up from the morning session's discussion on _%_Fire. _%_Staff has_%_ run some additional numbers (received and filed) _hd1_and she would like to know if the _%_Board wants to talk about them today or if t_hd1_hey want staff to send them out and _%_meet with the _%_Commissioners individually. _%_Commissioner _%_Dallari stated he would _%_like staff to pass them out so he can review t_hd1_hem. _%_N_hd1_o objections were voiced.

COUNTY ATTORNEY’S REPORT

M_h¥3__h¥3_s. _%_Porter-Carlton stated she has_%_ _%_p_h¥3_reviously _h¨1_up_h©2_dated _h«1_the _h¬1__#_Board _h1_on the _%_DJJ _h®1__h¯1__h°1__h±1_lit_h²1_igation_h³1_. _%_The _%_County _h´3_prevailed _h·1_at the _%_First _%_District _%_Court of _%_Appeal. _%_She also updated the _%_Board when the _%_County_h¸1__h¹1__hº1__h»2__h½1__h¾1__h¿1_ _hÀ3_prevailed _hÃ1_on _hÄ1_its attorney_hÅ1_'s fee_hÆ1_s motion _hÇ1_at _hÈ1_the_hÉ2_ _#_Division _hË1_of _hÌ1__%_Administrative _%_Hearings._hÍ1__hÎ1__hÏ1__hÐ2_ _%_She is_hÒ2_ pleased _hÔ1_to inform the _%_Board that the _%_County prevailed this month in the _%_Leon _%_County _%_Circuit _%_Court _hÜ3_declaratory _hß1_judg_hà1_ment action. _há1__%_S_hã2__hã2_taff is waiting _hå1_for the _"_judge to enter a written order; and _hæ1_as _hç1_soon _hè1_as _hé1_that _hê1_happens_hë2_, she will _hí1_be _hî2_sending _hð1_the _%_Board_%_ a _hñ1__hò1_memo _hó1__hô1__hõ3__hø1__hù1__hú1__hû1__hü1__i!1_and a copy of the order.

-------

There being no further business to come before the Board, the Chairman declared the meeting adjourned at 4:05 p.m., this same date.

ATTEST:______________________Clerk_____________________Chairman

js/ks