BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
SEMINOLE COUNTY, FLORIDA
September 8, 2020
The following is a non-verbatim
transcript of the BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS MEETING OF SEMINOLE COUNTY, FLORIDA, held both in person and virtually,
via Communications Media Technology (CMT) made permissible pursuant to the
Governor’s Executive Orders, at 9:30 a.m., on Tuesday, September 8, 2020, in
Room 1028 of the SEMINOLE COUNTY
SERVICES BUILDING at SANFORD,
FLORIDA, the usual place of meeting of said Board.
Attending
in person:
Chairman Jay
Zembower (District 2)
Vice Chairman Lee Constantine (District 3)
Commissioner
Robert Dallari (District 1)
Commissioner
Amy Lockhart (District 4)
County Manager
Nicole Guillet
County Attorney Bryant Applegate
Clerk of Court and Comptroller Grant Maloy
Absent:
Commissioner Brenda
Carey (District 5)
Attending remotely:
Deputy Clerk Chariti Colon
OPENING CEREMONIES
Pastor
Charles Jones, Antioch Baptist Church, Oviedo, gave the invocation. Commissioner Constantine led
the Pledge of Allegiance.
-------
Chairman
Zembower called for prayer, led by Kurt Slafkovsky, and a moment of silence in remembrance of
Environmental Services staff member Tomasz Sajkowski. Chris Graybosch,
Environmental Services, spoke about Mr. Sajkowski and
his service to the citizens of Seminole County.
AWARDS
AND PRESENTATIONS
Motion by Commissioner Lockhart, seconded
by Commissioner Dallari, to approve the Proclamation
proclaiming the week of September 17-23, 2020, Constitution Week in Seminole
County; Honorary Regent Jacque Davis.
(2020-2233)
Districts 1, 2, 3, and 4 voted AYE.
EMERGENCY
MANAGEMENT UPDATE
Alan
Harris, Office of Emergency Management addressed the Board to report on the emergency
management response to the COVID-19 pandemic (presentation received and filed.) Donna Walsh, Florida Department of Health;
Dr. Todd Husty, Medical Director; Tim Cook, AdventHealth Altamonte CEO; Dr. Anita Ekambaram,
Orlando Health South Seminole Hospital; Dr. Sean Benoit, Central Florida
Regional Hospital; and Dr. David Sinclair, AdventHealth,
spoke about testing and positivity rates, mask mandates, community conditions,
and the status of local hospitals.
Upon
inquiry of Commissioner Lockhart, Mr. Harris discussed pandemic guidelines in
the Comprehensive Emergency Management Plan.
The Commissioner then inquired how the numbers for benchmarks are being
determined. Dr. Husty
responded it is based on the hospitals and their resources. Ms. Walsh explained they did research across
the nation to find the metrics. The U.S.
Department of Health and Human Services released the metrics of if there is less
than 5% positivity rate in the community, test once a month. With 5% to 10% positivity rate in the community,
test every other week. With more than
10% positivity rate in the community, test weekly. Commissioner Lockhart expressed she thinks it
is important that the Board has a work session sometime in the future to discuss
with the professionals how to look at this from a policy perspective so they
know how to address it in the future.
Upon
inquiry of Commissioner Dallari, Mr. Harris explained
the process and timeline for updating the Comprehensive Emergency Management Plan,
which is due by the end of next year.
Commissioner Dallari confirmed with Mr. Harris
they can get input from the public and the Board during that process. Mr. Harris added that can even be done at a
work session. Chairman Zembower inquired if there was Board support for a work
session, and no objections were voiced. Chairman Zembower confirmed
with Ms. Guillet the Board’s direction to hold a work
session on this matter.
-------
The Chairman recessed the meeting at 10:59 a.m., reconvening
at 11:08 a.m.
CONSENT AGENDA
With regard
to public participation, no one spoke in support or opposition to the Consent
Agenda, and public input was closed.
Motion by Commissioner Dallari,
seconded by Commissioner Constantine, to approve the following:
County Manager’s Office
Business Office
2. Approve and
authorize the Chairman to execute the Agreement between Seminole County and The
Central Florida Zoological Society, Inc. for CARES Act funding. (2020-2234)
3. Approve and
authorize the Chairman to execute the First Amendment to the Interlocal
Agreement Between Seminole County and The School Board of Seminole County for
CARES Act funding in the amount of $5,481,907.
(2020-2235)
4. Approve the CARES Act Funding Agreement allocations for 11 Seminole
County not-for-profit agencies (Embrace Families, Kids House of Seminole, Inc.;
Seminole County Bar Legal Aid Society, Inc.; The Foundation for Seminole County
Public Schools, Inc.; Shepherd’s Hope, Inc.; Rescue Outreach Mission of Central
Florida, Inc.; IMPOWER, Inc.; Seminole County Victims’ Rights Coalition, Inc.
d/b/a SafeHouse of Seminole; Boys Town Central Florida,
Inc.; Boys and Girls Clubs of Central Florida; Seniors First, Inc.) totaling
$1,090,000; and authorize the Chairman to execute the necessary agreements. (2020-2236)
5. Approve and
authorize the Chairman to execute the Interlocal Agreements between Seminole
County and each of the seven municipalities (Altamonte Springs, Casselberry,
Lake Mary, Longwood, Oviedo, Sanford, and Winter Springs) relating to CARES Act
Funding. (2020-2239)
Community
Services
Business
Office
6. Approve and
authorize the Chairman to execute the State Housing Initiatives Partnership
(SHIP) Program Annual Report and Local Housing Incentives Certification form
for The State Housing Initiatives Partnership Program (SHIP) Annual Performance
Report (APR). (2020-2229)
Resource
Management
Budget
7. Approve and
authorize the Chairman to execute appropriate Resolution #2020-R-102
implementing Budget Amendment Request (BAR) 20-085 through the 2014
Infrastructure Sales Tax Fund in the amount of $4,500,000 from reserves for
additional funding for the General Engineering Consulting Contract (GEC) (CIPs#
01785486, #99999906). (2020-2226)
Districts 1, 2, 3, and 4 voted AYE.
COUNTY MANAGER BRIEFING
Ms. Guillet requested authorization to delegate signatory
authority to Tricia Johnson, Deputy County Manager, on the CARES Act Small
Business Grant applications so they don't have to run them all through the
Chairman's office for signature.
Motion by Commissioner Dallari,
seconded by Commissioner Constantine, to delegate
signatory authority to Tricia Johnson, Deputy County Manager, for CARES Act
Small Business Grant applications.
Districts 1, 2, 3, and 4 voted AYE.
-------
Ms. Guillet
advised in early August, the President issued an executive order allowing for
the deferral of certain payroll taxes for employees making under $104,000 a
year. Although the executive order was
issued a month ago, the guidance only came out recently; and they have been
trying to understand how all of that works and whether or not to opt in or opt
out. Under the guidance, what gets
deferred under that program is the Social Security tax of about 6.2% that is
withheld from every employee's paycheck.
It would be withheld between September 1 and the end of the year, and it
has to be paid back between January and April of next year. They have discussed it internally and with
other local government entities, and staff's recommendation is to not take
advantage of that deferral because even though the employees will be required
between January and April of next year to pay it back, the County will actually
be the ones responsible for collecting and remitting it. If somebody leaves during that time period, the
County is on the hook for that. Ms. Guillet stated unless the Board had an objection, that's
the direction they would like to go with that.
No objections were voiced.
ITEMS FOR FUTURE AGENDA
Kelly Shilson,
224 Slade Drive, spoke in regards to the
coronavirus and in opposition to the local executive order mandating wearing
masks in public.
-------
Barbara Dini, 21850 Dairy Road,
Eustis, spoke in regards to the coronavirus and in opposition to the local
executive order mandating wearing masks in public.
-------
Diana Danin,
938 East Palm Valley Drive, spoke in regards to the Legacy 240 Rezone approved
during public hearing at the August 25, 2020, meeting. Ms. Danin stated
the proposal she believes the Board wanted to pass was for four stories and 45
feet, and an email Commissioner Carey referenced that was sent to Development
Services staff stated five stories.
Because of that conflict, she requests the Board rescind the approved
motion, bring the entire proposal back through the development process because
it was never properly vetted, and bring it back for public hearing. Ms. Danin inquired
how to propose questions publicly to the Board that they would have to respond
to, and Chairman Zembower advised if it is on an
agenda matter or future item. If it
something specific, it would be to staff.
The Chairman requested Ms. Guillet reach out
to Ms. Danin to see what kind of question she may
have and provide her any information she may need.
Commissioner Constantine noted he
had voted against the proposal. It was
his understanding four stories is what was approved. The Commissioner requested input from the
County Attorney. Bryant Applegate,
County Attorney, advised Ms. Danin has said she plans
to file a lawsuit concerning the Board's action, so he would ask there be no
further comment at this point. Ms. Guillet clarified the Board's action was based on the draft
Development Order and not on an email.
Mr. Applegate added his office reviewed the public hearing in
detail. They are very confident the
Board followed the right procedures, and they will defend a lawsuit if it's
filed.
-------
Chairman
Zembower recessed the BCC meeting and convened the
BCC work sessions (Agenda Items #8 and #9) at 11:29 a.m.
WORK SESSIONS
Chairman Zembower
stated they would be doing the work sessions out of order since there were
multiple presentations for Rosenwald School.
Item #9 – 2020-2238
County-Owned
Property Redevelopment Project (Rosenwald School) Presentations
Betsy Cohen, Acting Purchasing
and Contracts Manager, addressed the Board and stated the County issued a
Request for Qualifications for redevelopment services of 12+ acres of the
County-owned property formerly known as Rosenwald School, and they received
four responses. The County held a
community meeting on July 20, 2020, where the presenters had the opportunity to
present their proposals. She advised
those four firms were present today to present to the Board.
Ms. Guillet
stated these proposals were submitted based on a scope of services the Board
has reviewed. Staff has reviewed and
ranked the proposals. They are not
looking for the Board to choose a proposer today. Because they are all very different, staff
wanted the Board to have the opportunity to have more time than during a
regular BCC meeting to listen to the presentations, ask questions, and provide
feedback to staff. At the end of the
presentations, staff is looking to get some feedback with respect to next
steps.
Blue Sky
Communities
Ryan Raghoo,
Blue Sky Assistant Vice President of Project Development, addressed the Board
and introduced Adilia Richemond,
Green Slate Land & Development. Mr. Raghoo and Ms. Richemond
presented Blue Sky's proposal (presentation received and filed).
Commissioner Lockhart noted all of the
plans seem to be an affordable housing project with some community stuff thrown
in and stated she was more hopeful it was going to be something for the
community with some affordable housing.
The Commissioner stated under Section I, Community Engagement, it refers
to the Area Study Plan that the Renaissance Planning Group did in 2014 and
states they are fashioning their community engagement around that plan. She inquired who solicited that plan as it is
not something she is familiar with. Mr. Raghoo responded that plan was provided as part of the
RFP. Ms. Guillet
explained that is the Winwood East Altamonte plan
that was done following the SunRail station. Commissioner Lockhart inquired if it was done
in conjunction with the City of Altamonte Springs. Ms. Guillet
responded it was not. The City's plan
was finished before that, but parts of that are incorporated. Commissioner Lockhart asked Mr. Raghoo if the We Kare Plan was provided as well. Mr. Raghoo
responded it was not, but they can look at it if it is provided. Ms. Guillet
explained the We Kare Plan is specifically referenced in the Renaissance
Plan.
Commissioner Lockhart inquired what the
affordability period is for Blue Sky's development. Shawn Wilson, President of Blue
Sky Communities, responded the State requires 50 years, but they have
agreed to perpetuity. The Commissioner
inquired if the lead community partner will be a team member on Blue Sky's team
or if they will just be coordinating outside of Blue Sky's team. Mr. Wilson responded they would be part of
their team, and it could be a person or an organization. Commissioner Lockhart confirmed with Mr.
Wilson that entity, as a part of their team, would be considered for
compensation.
Chairman Zembower
stated there should be an education aspect to this as well in conjunction with
the School Board, and this is going to be a big community center for this
region. The Chairman inquired about Blue
Sky's community land trust experience.
Mr. Wilson explained Blue Sky has not done any community land trust
development so far because the opportunity has not yet arisen. They have done several nonprofit joint
ventures where there was a lead community partner, and those partners were
actual partners in the entity. He noted
they can still accommodate compensation at the level described in their
proposal with a community land trust.
Chairman Zembower inquired about the vetting
of the lead community partner, whether it's a person or entity. Mr. Wilson explained they prefer the lead
community partner be a 501(c)(3) organization with a locally based board, and
it doesn't matter if they have staff or not.
It can also be a group of faith-based institutions. They wouldn't want it to be just a person or
a company or a church. They would want
it to be a group of people that can speak for the community or at least has the
confidence of the community. Chairman Zembower inquired how they would accommodate community
input. Mr. Wilson responded they have
reached out to the South Seminole Community Association for Progress, and he
believes they are an organization that could be a potential. They would look for the Board's input and for
staff's input on how to bring together a lead community partner organization.
Mr. Wilson addressed Commissioner
Lockhart's concern about there being more affordable housing and less community
and explained the first goal listed in the plan they were provided was mixed
income and elderly housing. Since that
was the first one, they took it to mean that was the primary need of the
community to be addressed, and that's why it's heavily focused on affordable
housing.
Commissioner Dallari
stated as they move forward, he would hope to see how they are transcending the
Winwood Community.
He does not want Winwood to lose their
identity. He did not see in the
presentation what they are doing to either help the community with their
identity or help them move them forward.
The Commissioner requested elaboration on that, because this is the
mustard seed on how they are going to help the Winwood
Community flourish and keep their identity.
Ms. Richemond explained with the mustard seed
concept, once you get going and you don't take the time to plan, to put the
people in place, to have a community leader, and have these types of
conversations, you are bulldozed. In the
more sensitive communities, they find themselves in a situation watching
everything else grow up around them.
What Blue Sky is proposing is something where they can have a lot of
community engagement or encourage the community to be more a part of their
community and have a say-so. She would
encourage everyone to understand the fears of that community of what happens
when development goes there; such as do they still live there, are they still a
part of that community, are they still a part of the fabric. Those conversations are important, and right
now they have the opportunity to pave the way.
Commissioner Constantine suggested a
community committee instead of having a single group as the Winwood
Community leader group.
Bright
Community Trust/Central Florida Regional Housing Trust
Frank Wells, Central Florida Regional
Housing Trust Chief Executive; Gary Tester, President of Catholic Charities of
Central Florida; and Traci Blue, CFRHT Director of Strategic Community
Initiatives, presented CFRHT’s proposal (presentation received and filed).
Commissioner Lockhart noted Seminole State
College’s logo was a part of the presentation.
The Commissioner clarified, as a trustee of Seminole State, the college
is willing to work with anyone who would take on this project to provide adult
high school or any other type of certification.
She added she does not believe Winwood and
East Altamonte is broken and needs fixing as described in the
presentation. The community is
incredibly engaged and resilient, and they have done amazing work even though
they have not been provided some of the resources that other communities have.
Schumer
Capital Corporation
Eric Haynes, Schumer Capital Corporation
Chief Investment Officer, presented Schumer Capital Corporation’s proposal
(presentation received and filed).
Commissioner Dallari
inquired how 10% equity partner would work and if the County had ever done that
before. Ms. Guillet
responded staff has not explored that detail or whether or not it would be an
appropriate element of a partnership with the County, and they would have to
look at that. Upon request of
Commissioner Dallari, Ms. Guillet
reviewed what the RFQ requested the applicants to submit. Mr. Haynes explained the 10% equity piece was
the 10% that the association would get as a member of the ownership team for
the RFQ, so the association itself will have a 10% vested interest in the
development that's inside their community.
Commissioner Dallari inquired if the
development went into the red, would the association then be responsible from a
10% standpoint, and Mr. Haynes advised they would not. Typically, in terms of operating losses or
anything, the primarily developers, he and his partners, will cover any
shortfalls. There would be an operating
agreement, and it would be a special purpose entity that's created specifically
for the engagement.
Commissioner Constantine noted this
presentation is the first group that actually wants to use the existing
building, which has been sitting there for a long time. He inquired if the building can actually be
saved and used. Mr. Haynes responded Buildings
One and Two are very structurally sound, and there's minimal work needed to
update them. They do not know about the
rest of the buildings, which is why they did not propose to keep any of them.
Chairman Zembower
inquired where the gated senior living came from. Mr. Haynes explained the community center is
not part of the overall development so there needs to be some kind of
separation aspect to it. That gated
aspect of it would be a private drive that goes alongside that gives access to
the senior housing component. That way,
the public and the community can continue to use Buildings One and Two and the
area out in front of it. Chairman Zembower confirmed with Mr. Haynes that grant programs can
be accommodated with a gated-type community.
Southport
Development, Inc.
Jordan Nelson, Southport Financial
Services, Inc. Development Manager; and Brie Lemmerman,
Southport Financial Services, Inc. Project Manager, presented Southport’s
proposal (presentation received and filed).
Commissioner Constantine mentioned out of
the four proposals being presented, two of them didn't mention any dollar
amount or what they would do to pay for the property, one was $2 million in
cash, and theirs was $12,000 a year for 99 years. The Commissioner inquired why they took that
approach as opposed to purchasing the property.
Ms. Nelson responded they have done this land lease program with other
jurisdictions and it's just proven to be successful. The County still has their name on something,
and they're still getting an influx of income into the community. It benefits all of the parties. Upon request of Commissioner Constantine
regarding the developer taking $3.6 million immediately out of the project, Ms.
Lemmerman explained that would be provided at the end
of the construction period after two years.
Ms. Nelson added a portion of that would be their owner equity which
they will put in to cover the differences in costs throughout the project's
construction.
Chairman Zembower
noted in the written proposal, it talks about committing to own and operate
this facility for a minimum of 15 years.
He inquired what happens in the 16th year. Ms. Lemmerman
responded part of the Florida Housing Program is that you commit to a 15-year
financing at which point you become eligible to reapply for additional tax
credits, whether it be through preservation or other avenues. At that point, they have the opportunity to
"recycle" the community to receive additional funding to help
rehabilitate should the community need rehabilitation on any different
level. During that period, they are not
eligible nor would they have any intention of removing the affordable component
of that, as they would commit to keeping that an affordable community
throughout the life of the property. In
the proposal, it mentions 50 years because that is the government requirement;
but they would honor the lifetime of the land lease which is 99 years, during
which period that community would remain affordable.
Board
Discussion
Commissioner Constantine stated he thinks
it's important that staff takes a hard look after all of the discussion and
questions had today and comes back with a recommendation as to how to go
forward. He also thinks it's important
that the Board and community communicate the various needs they want to have
within the proposal.
Chairman Zembower
stated he thinks the first thing they have to do as a Board is decide what
vehicle they are going to utilize on this property and possibly others for
affordable housing. He would support a
work session on getting some finality on that so staff knows where to go.
Commissioner Dallari
expressed his biggest issue is making sure they are preserving the heritage of
the Winwood Community, how they can transcend this
community for future generations, and what they are doing to be that small
mustard seed as they move forward to allow them to be a part of it. He does not want to see this just turned into
a housing development.
Commissioner Lockhart agreed with
Commissioner Dallari's point that if they were just
going to have this be an affordable housing development, the School Board could
have done that. The intention was that
this be to the benefit of the existing community. She is concerned with the idea of having just
one entity in the community having such a big stake and say and having some
type of remuneration. That concept is
not being well received in the community, and she thinks they need to spend
some time listening to the residents of the Winwood/East
Altamonte area. They need to continue to
pursue what happens with this project for the benefit of the community, and she
thinks they have more work to do. She
does not know what more staff can do with these proposals without getting
direction from the Board.
Ms. Guillet
commented this is similar to lot of the circumstances when they were first looking
at Five Points. The difference is the
County was going to pay for that project completely. Now that the Board understands a little
better what the options are, maybe they should develop a plan that reflects
what their intentions are for the community, and then they can still work with
private partners to effectuate whatever plan that is created. She clarified she is not asking the Board to
make that decision today. From what the
Board has said today, they are not ready for staff to come back with a ranking
and recommendation, which would normally be the next step at this point. Chairman Zembower stated
he believes there is consensus they
are not ready to rank. No objections were voiced. Ms. Guillet
suggested staff meet with each of the Commissioners individually and then come
back at the next meeting to talk about what the next step would be.
Commissioner Lockhart noted the working
group related to the Lillie H. Green Community Center was a rather large group
made up of the College, the Health Department, the School District, different
nonprofits, and County staff. What they
came up with was even if certain things didn't happen at Lillie H. Green,
perhaps the same model could be moved to Rosenwald. One of the things the Commissioner kept
saying to the community was she knew they were frustrated that Lillie H. Green
is not providing the services and the accessibility they were looking for, but
Rosenwald is coming and will be an opportunity to bring all of those services
together in a one-stop shop there. The
Commissioner expressed she feels very responsible having been that messenger to
them letting them know that that type of collaboration was going to occur
whether it be at Lillie H. Green or at Rosenwald. Commissioner Dallari
commented they all shared that same philosophy.
Ms. Guillet
advised one of the decisions the Board should be thinking about is how much
they want to invest in public funds in the site. One of the reasons the proposals are so heavy
with housing is because that underwrites the cost of the community
facilities. If the Board wants a more
robust community facility element, then they need to be thinking about how much
they are willing to invest in that. If
they start to cut down the housing, that's going to minimize the amount of
partnership that is going to be available to fund the community element of
it. Chairman Zembower
stated if staff would bring information to the Board on how much will need to
be invested versus letting the private sector carrying it, then the Board can
make a better decision.
With regard to public participation, Christine
Watkins, 639 Lake Mobile Drive, spoke in support. Irvin Simpson, 2091 South Ronald Reagan
Boulevard, spoke in support and addressed concerns of the need to consider
senior and millennial housing, equity portion to the community and the need to
address the community fear that they will be displaced.
Mr. Haynes clarified the equity partner
from the community will be a 501(c)(3) and will have to comply with tax laws
and things of that nature.
No one else spoke in
support or opposition, and public input was closed.
Chairman Zembower confirmed with Ms. Guillet
staff had direction.
-------
The Chairman recessed the meeting at
1:44 p.m., reconvening at 1:59 p.m.
-------
Item #8 – 2020-2237
Code
Enforcement: Seminole County Code 95,
Health and Sanitation
Mary Moskowitz,
Planning and Development Division, reviewed the Code Enforcement presentation,
which was included in the agenda memorandum.
There were requests for clarification and
a question-and-answer session between the Board and staff.
Chairman Zembower
stated he is okay with giving direction to staff on their recommendations. His concern has always been equal treatment
under the law, trying to get compliance, and compensating taxpayers fairly for
staff time.
Commissioner Lockhart inquired if staff had
a preference to keep unsecured pools in the lien environment or move them over
to the abatement process. Rebecca
Hammock, Development Services Director, responded either way they will be
abated if they're a life safety issue.
However, she thinks the County is more likely to be reimbursed if it
becomes a special assessment lien and is attached to the property taxes. Ms. Guillet
cautioned when considering which lien mechanism to use, whether it's a lien on
the property or a tax bill lien, that some people might not have that money
when their tax bill comes due. The
reason why it might not be repaired is because they can't afford it and they
may not be able to pay it when their tax bill comes due, so then they have a
delinquent tax situation.
Ms. Hammock stated the other thing staff
would like direction on is the definition of an abandoned or junk vehicle and
whether that would include a tag and registration. Upon Chairman Zembower's
inquiry of what staff's recommendation and research is on that, Ms. Moskowitz
responded within Seminole County, most jurisdictions do require a tag to be
considered an abandoned vehicle with the exceptions of Longwood and Winter
Springs. Oviedo does not explicitly
require a tag to be considered an abandoned vehicle, but they say that it could
be used as evidence in the case. All of
the other surrounding cities and Volusia and Orange Counties would consider a
vehicle without tags an abandoned vehicle.
Chairman Zembower, Commissioner Lockhart, and
Commissioner Dallari all commented in support of
allowing a tag to be evidence. Ms.
Moskowitz stated they can draft some language similar to what Oviedo has and
bring it back. Chairman Zembower noted it's been 43 years since this portion of the
code has been updated. A discussion
ensued on reviewing existing Ordinances.
Ms. Hammock advised staff will prepare an
Ordinance in conjunction with the County Attorney's Office and then bring it to
the Commission as a public hearing for consideration.
CARES
ACT UPDATE
Ms.
Guillet presented the CARES Act Update (presentation
received and filed). She advised they
have been working with Seminole State College to put together a workforce
training program mostly focused on rapid credentialing to get people back into
the workforce. The estimated cost is
almost half a million dollars, and those details were previously distributed to
the Commissioners (received and filed).
Ms. Guillet requested authorization to work
with that number so the College can start moving forward, and the original agreement
will be brought back at the next meeting for ratification.
Motion
by Commissioner Dallari, seconded by Chairman
Constantine, to approve the request of the County Manager.
Districts 1,
2, 3, and 4 voted AYE.
-------
There
being no further business to come before the Board, the Chairman declared the
meeting adjourned at 2:50 p.m., this same date.
ATTEST:_____________________________Clerk___________________________Chairman
cc