BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS

SEMINOLE COUNTY, FLORIDA

MAY 22, 2007

 

 

     The following is a non-verbatim transcript of the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS MEETING OF SEMINOLE COUNTY, FLORIDA, held at 9:32 a.m., on Tuesday, May 22, 2007, in the SEMINOLE COUNTY SERVICES BUILDING at SANFORD, FLORIDA, the usual place of meeting of said Board.

     Present:

     Chairman Carlton Henley (District 4)

     Vice Chairman Brenda Carey (District 5)

     Commissioner Bob Dallari (District 1)

     Commissioner Mike McLean (District 2)

     Commissioner Dick Van Der Weide (District 3)

     County Manager Cindy Coto

     County Attorney Robert McMillan

     Deputy Clerk Carylon Cohen

 

     The Invocation was given by Pastor Hoyer, Holy Cross Lutheran Church, Lake Mary.

     County Attorney Robert McMillan led the Pledge of Allegiance.

Awards and Presentations

 

     Motion by Commissioner Dallari, seconded by Commissioner Carey, to adopt appropriate Resolution #2007-R-99, as shown on page _______, acknowledging the contributions of the hospitality industry to our economy by designating May 2007 as "Tourism Month in Seminole County".

     Districts 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 voted AYE.

     Commissioner Dallari presented the Resolution to Diane Crews, who expressed thanks to the Board.


     Motion by Commissioner Carey, seconded by Commissioner Van Der Weide, to adopt appropriate Resolution #2007-R-97, as shown on page _______, congratulating Bill Poe on receiving the 2007 Leadership Seminole Legends Award and commending him on his exemplary character traits, leadership and vision.

     Districts 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 voted AYE.

     Commissioner Carey presented the Resolution to Mr. Poe.

     Commissioner Van Der Weide stated Mr. Poe is the most recent volunteer to the Hero’s War Memorial Group.

     Mr. Poe expressed thanks to the Commissioners on behalf of the 150 folks he currently serves.  He said they have been very supportive of SWOP and without their support, they would not have been able to accomplish what they did.

-------

     Motion by Commissioner Van Der Weide, seconded by Commissioner Dallari, to adopt appropriate Resolution #2007-R-96, as shown on page _______, congratulating Mike Arena and the Altamonte Jazz Ensemble for being selected as Seminole County's "2007 Artist of the Year".

     Districts 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 voted AYE.

     Commissioner Van Der Weide presented the Resolution to Mr. Arena and Ruby Homayssi of the Arts Council.

     Mr. Arena thanked the Board and the Arts Council for recognizing the Jazz Ensemble and for supporting them.

     Ms. Homayssi thanked the Board for presenting awards such as this to encourage the artists in our community to continue to enrich our lives.  She thanked Mr. Arena and said the Jazz Ensemble is a delight. 

-------

     Motion by Commissioner McLean, seconded by Commissioner Van Der Weide, to adopt appropriate Resolution #2007-R-100, as shown on page _______, honoring Vival D. Gilson for her twenty-two years of service and dedication to the citizens and employees of Seminole County upon her retirement from Seminole County Government.

     Districts 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 voted AYE.

     Commissioner McLean presented the Resolution to Ms. Gilson, who thanked Joe Gasparini, Parks & Recreation Manager, and the rest of the staff.  She said the parks are a great place to go, and Seminole County has done an outstanding job with them.

-------

     Motion by Commissioner Carey, seconded by Commissioner McLean, to adopt appropriate Resolution #2007-R-98, as shown on page _______, honoring Ginny Markley for her thirty-two years of service and dedication to the citizens and employees of Seminole County upon her retirement from Seminole County Government.

     Chairman Henley announced that Ms. Markley advised she was unable to be in attendance today.

     Districts 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 voted AYE.

-------

     George Kosmac, Deputy Superintendent, Seminole County Public Schools, addressed the Board to state they have been working hard on developing a basis for an increase in the school impact fees.  In February of this year, after a long study, the School Board approved a resolution recommending an increase.  He understands the purpose of this meeting is to present where the School Board is and potentially refer the School Board back to the Planning and Zoning Commission.  After that, if the P&Z recommends, the School Board will come back before the County Commission.  He said, hopefully, he will come back and, at that time, he will have the impact fee consultant present to make a detailed presentation on the study.  He stated the School Board is recommending the Board of County Commissioners amend the Land Development Code Sections 105.4 and 105.21 updating the school impact fees.  He reviewed a Power Point (revised version received and filed) presentation discussing the Proposed Fees; the Process; and Potential Impact Fee Financed Projects 2007-2017.

     Chairman Henley asked how many school additions are coming about as a result of the class size amendment.  Mr. Kosmac stated they don’t break them up by which ones are needed for class size versus which ones are needed for growth.  Whereupon, Chairman Henley asked if he doesn’t do that, then how is he going to avoid co-mingling the funds from the Department of Education with impact fees which can only be spent for new growth in the area.

     Mr. Kosmac stated they will need to do that as it is being done now with the impact fees.  He said they have a separate project fund and they keep very close records and insure that the money from the impact fees is only going towards growth.  He said he thinks these are all potential impact fee projects.

     Chairman Henley said he was hoping this would be set up in such a way that the Board would be able to get reports to track the use of impact fee money.

     Mr. Kosmac said the School Board can provide the Board with all the data now on what every penny of impact fee money was spent on since 2000. 

     Commissioner Carey said she understands that there are certain things impact fees can’t be used for.  One of those is for the deficiency in classrooms.  They can’t be used just to replace portables.  Mr. Kosmac explained that the impact fee money is not being used for that purpose.  Whereupon, Commissioner Carey said she was trying to get a clearer picture of what they could use impact fees for.  She said it’s not $255,000,000 worth of projects if a lot of those are replacing portables and that type of thing.  She clarified that these are projects approved by the Department of Education (DOE) for the School Board to do, but not to fund with impact fees.

     Mr. Kosmac advised the Chairman he would clarify the title (Potential Impact Fee Financed Projects 2007-2017)for this information before he goes before the P&Z Commission.

     Commissioner Dallari asked Mr. Kosmac to discuss the existing and projected student population.  He also asked Mr. Kosmac if, when he comes back before the Board, he will be able to give the student population and the class size based on location so the Board can see how the overcrowding is.  Mr. Kosmac stated he can provide that information for this year.

     Chairman Henley also asked Mr. Kosmac to provide what the capital revenues and other funding is from the State.  Mr. Kosmac stated the capital budget is not firmed up until August or September.

     Commissioner McLean asked where does local funding fit in and in what time frame will he see that.  Whereupon, Mr. Kosmac said that’s the same time frame as the capital budget, in August or September.  He said he could provide the Board with the latest copy of their five-year capital plan. 

     Commissioner Van Der Weide stated it’s hard to be put in a situation where they have this information on the screens for the public watching County TV to see that these are potential impact fee financed projects, but which clearly don’t meet the criteria for what the money can be used for.  He said this type effort bothers him.  Whatever they do as Commissioners, they have to defend.  He said they are trying to be supportive, but have to ask the right questions and have to make sure everyone, particularly the public, understands where they are headed with this and what they are trying to accomplish.  He said the Commissioners are cautious about putting out anything that would be misleading, and this information is clearly misleading.  He hopes this can be cleared up. 

     Mr. Kosmac continued the PowerPoint review with the Impact Fee Collections; Statewide Comparisons; and Escalation Cost.

     Upon inquiry by Commissioner Carey, Mr. Kosmac said he could do the research and be able to provide the Board with information on which counties that have impact fees might have indexing.

     Commissioner Carey asked Mr. Kosmac who recommended looking at some type of cost indexing.  He stated they had a meeting with Ms. Coto and staff and this came up during that meeting.

     County Manager Cindy Coto addressed the Board to state this was during a discussion and she asked Mr. Kosmac if they had ever considered cost indexing and suggested they may want to look at other school districts as to whether or not they had used that method.  She explained this was not a direction, but more of a question for him to evaluate that.

     Chairman Henley stated this will be sent to the P&Z for their purview and recommendations.  He said the Board recognizes that the School Board does have needs and these are awkward times for the School Board and the County Commission not knowing what the Legislature is going to do to them.  He said there is no doubt that the County revenues are going to be cut and that’s going to impact a lot of services the County provides and a lot of organizations that are doing good will not get the County Commission’s support as a result.  This is at a time when the front page of the news media and the TV is talking about affordable housing and yet what the Board does in regard to this may well increase the cost of those houses and make it more difficult and disenfranchise another group of the citizens who can no longer afford to live in the community.  He added that the Board will give this serious consideration when it comes back.

     Commissioner Carey asked if County staff had validated the information given by the consultant.

     Ms. Coto said she doesn’t know if validation is the appropriate word to use, because the County did not retain its own experts to go through the same process the School Board went through regarding the school impact fee consultant.  After the joint workshop with the School Board, the County sent a memorandum to Dr. Vogel and asked some questions related to areas where staff saw some discrepancies between some of the dollars within the impact fees as well as what was happening with the County’s concurrency plan with the School Board.  A meeting was held and the School Board came back after the meeting with a follow-up memorandum responding to those questions.  She believes staff found the report adequately addressed the County’s questions.

     Upon inquiry by Commissioner Carey, Mr. McMillan stated the impact fees cannot be used to deal with deficiencies caused by the class size amendment.  The class size amendment will affect how much will have to be built in the future for those students that come as a result of growth, so that will be part of future growth, but not for rectifying deficiencies that exist at the time of adoption of the impact fee.  Further, he said for increased capacity that has to be built that isn’t being driven by any additional students, the impact fee is not an appropriate revenue source.  If it is caused by the additional students that come with growth, impact fees could be used.  He explained impact fees can be used for land acquisition if the acquisition is driven by the need to construct facilities for future students caused by growth.

     Chairman Henley advised the way impact fees work always puts the School Board behind because you can’t use the money except for the students as they get here.  He said you can’t use impact fees for transfer of students, but there must be new students to the system. 

     Commissioner Carey stated when they had the work session with the School Board, the Board had asked for a list of what the impact fees were being used for and she has not seen that.  She said she would like to see that before she would vote to potentially increase the impact fees.

     Commissioner Carey asked Mr. McMillan if affordable housing could be excluded from impact fees.  Mr. McMillan said no, unless something changes.  He said the Board could include in the affordable housing programs a provision that another source of funds would be used to pay the impact fees through the affordable housing grants.  He stated everybody who causes an impact has to be charged an impact fee.

     Commissioner McLean stated his concern is they may be in a scenario where whatever fees they have now, or whatever they decide in the future, get unintentionally spent in an area that it should not be.  He agreed with Commissioner Carey that they need to have a much more definitive idea of what the standards are--where impact fees can and cannot be used.  He also agreed with Commissioner Van Der Weide about misinformation.

     Mr. McMillan stated it is rare that a single project is funded totally from impact fees or totally from other revenue sources.  Generally, there is a proration involved where certain funds are used for deficit correction and certain funds used for excess capacity being created, and there is an impact fee portion of that.

     Mr. Kosmac advised Commissioner McLean that the School Board does have a system in place to distinguish between the fees.

     Chairman Henley requested Mr. Kosmac forward a copy of the DOE plan survey to the Board.

     Chairman Henley stated unless there are objections, the Board will refer this request to the P&Z Commission and the Board will get more details from the School Board.

     Commissioner Carey asked for clarification on what the Board is going to refer to the P&Z.  She asked are they sending the School Board’s recommendation to the P&Z.  Chairman Henley stated yes, the School Board’s recommendation is being sent in order to get P&Z’s input. 

     Ms. Coto advised the BCC has the ability to make suggestions and/or amendments to what has been presented that would be included as part of the package to the P&Z.

     Mr. McMillan explained what the general process is.  He said he is sensing that the Board would like to send this request to the P&Z first and then have the School Board come back to the Board before the adoption hearing is held.  Discussion ensued.

     Commissioner Carey said she would have a concern with sending this forward with an automatic increase in it every year.  Commissioner Van Der Weide said he agrees.  Commissioner Carey discussed that the School Board is proposing to raise the impact fee when there is a declining enrollment.  She thinks when the study was done, the schools did not have a declining enrollment, so the consultant’s comment was that they were looking at a continuing growth pattern and that’s how they came up with their numbers.  Now, since the study was completed, the schools have had a declining enrollment.  She asked what does that do to the number and is it valid any more.  She said she is recommending taking the indexing out and that the Board consider the numbers they would move forward for the impact fee to go to.  She thinks the study was done based on growth and there was no declining factor at all.

     Mr. Kosmac said it is correct that they did not have the impact of this current school year factored into the analysis by the consultant.  He said if they look at prior years, there is not a constant increase every year.  There are fluctuations.  The question is whether this is a down year and the numbers will be back up next year.  He said what happens if the enrollment increases and they delay; then they will be further “behind the ball.”  He said he would hesitate to say no and wait until they get new numbers for this coming school year to see if they are still declining, because there will always be a certain amount of fluctuations.

     Chairman Henley said he thinks part of the concern is collecting fees when they don’t have a reason to and the School Board will be holding money that they can’t use.  When growth comes two years down the road, they will have all that money sitting in the pot and still can’t use it because they didn’t spend it for the ones at the time they collected it.

     Commissioner Van Der Weide stated he thinks indexing is a bad idea and he would support a motion to take that out.  He thinks that could be looked at any time it warrants the impact fee to be readdressed.

     Commissioner McLean said in that case, he doesn’t see any down side to taking the process to P&Z as per the Land Development Code, and let the P&Z see all the options, including indexing.  When it comes back, the Board can have the discussion at that time.  He doesn’t see the reason to eliminate that option now.

     Commissioner Carey stated if they send the request to the P&Z the way it is now, they are sending the signal that the Board thought the request was o.k.  She said she would rather send this request in the right format and get the ordinance to be something the Board would like it to be before they send it forward for someone else to review.

     Commissioner McLean said he doesn’t see the discussion the Board is having today to be any kind of inferred approval of anything, including the indexing.  They are just moving this through the process although it is different than what’s been done in the past.  The Board has been taking information up to now.

     Chairman Henley stated the recommendation came to the Board of County Commissioners rather than the P&Z, but normally they go to P&Z first and then the Board gets the request along with the P&Z’s recommendation.  The Board is not following its own Land Development Code and that’s his reason for sending the request to the P&Z.  The BCC still has the option of deleting anything in the recommendation when it comes back to the BCC.  Discussion continued.

     Commissioner Van Der Weide stated his issue is the escalator clause with the indexing.  This is something very new that could get completely out of hand. 

     Commissioner Carey said she doesn’t want to see an escalator clause in the ordinance. 

     Chairman Henley stated if there are no objections, the Board will forward the request to the P&Z, excluding the escalator clause.  He advised Mr. Kosmac that he hopes he will be prepared to address the issues raised today when he goes before the P&Z and when he comes back to the BCC.  He further advised him to include the requested information to the P&Z and send copies to the BCC.

     Commissioner Carey reiterated especially the list of projects that are eligible for impact fees and what the School Board did with the $50,000,000 in impact fees they have already collected.

-------

     Chairman Henley recessed the meeting at 10:37 a.m. and reconvened it at 10:49 a.m.

     Phil Laurien, Executive Director of the East Central Florida Regional Planning Council, addressed the Board to give a PowerPoint presentation (CD received and filed) reviewing the rules for the planning exercise asked to be completed by all the County Commissioners and Mayors of the jurisdictions in the myRegion area.  He reviewed the following topics:  What Could These Themes Look Like; Creating Composite Using the Best of All Three Scenarios; Central Florida Has Its Regional 2050 Vision; People’s Choice 2050 Vision:  4C’s (Conservation Centers, Corridors, and Countryside); Where Do You Envision Your Community To Be In 50 Years; and Building Our Region.  He explained they are asking the Board to consider where they think there may be unincorporated areas that might rise to the level of one of the different population bubbles (hamlet, village, town, small city, medium city or regional city) in Year 2050 and show that on the map, sign off on the form and return that to the ECFRPC office by June 5.  He said the Council will take all the information returned and see how much population the elected officials are envisioning actually being in centers in the Year 2050 from the 7.1 million the State projects the population to be.  He reviewed next the Overlay Themes.

     Chairman Henley stated the problem the County has is the fact that it is almost built out.  The smallest bubble is the hamlet of 5,000.  He said they have to look for a place where 5,000 people might go in the unincorporated area in order to give the Council some information.  He said outside of the Heathrow area, he cannot think of any other area without getting into the rural area and that won’t happen.

     Commissioner Carey said the Heathrow area is an already planned DRI that is mostly built out.  She said she can’t imagine where in unincorporated Seminole County there would be a DRI to arise because there is probably no location for that to happen.  She said she is not sure they will have any areas to “dot” in unincorporated Seminole County.  She asked the Planning & Development Director if she was planning to come up with some ideas.

     Dori DeBord, Planning & Development Director, addressed the Board to state one of the areas noted on the map is the Chuluota area that today would be a hamlet (less than 5,000 population).  She said that would be something she would continue to envision with the same growth pattern.  They would dot that on the map as a hamlet.  Staff is not planning on growth coming into that area and promoting it into any more of an urban developed center.  An area currently not included would be something along the 46A Corridor along I-4.  That may be an area, given the growth there, that might be a village or a town.  She said the Wekiva area will stop seeing a great deal of urban development, but what is there is developing at a very high intensity urban core.  Those are two areas to consider.  Also, the 46 Corridor near I-4 might be another area to consider as a potential village or town corridor.  The only area staff would look at with regard to commuter rail might be the station location in the city of Sanford where there is some unincorporated property.  Because staff sees that going into Sanford, that might not be an area the County would dot.

     Commissioner Van Der Weide noted that it’s hard to predict where the public wants to go.

     Mr. Laurien continued with review of the Action Items for the Seminole County Commission.  He said they are still looking for endorsement of the regional compact and the policy framework.  They would also like for the Commission to attend the regional summit on August 10, 2007, at Champions Gate in Osceola County.

     Chairman Henley advised there are two things Mr. Laurien may not be aware of--one is of the committee set up where they are trying to tie the conservation corridors available in the seven county region.  They are still working on refining the compact language that the Commission will eventually be asked to agree to as it is how they will proceed in the future.  He believes they are honing in on the final version of that.

-------

     Chairman Henley advised he tried to send information (copies of memorandums received and filed) to the Board on the Lake Mary High School Pool.  This has been in the works for well over a year and former Commissioner Morris was the Board’s representative working with the School Board.  At the last meeting, the BCC had a discussion and took action that they did not want to move forward until they see the third party contract.  He said he doesn’t think they realized what the impact would be on this situation.  He said the high school now has the money, and the city of Lake Mary has come forth with their portion of the money.  The School Board can’t move forward with the RFP because there is not an agreement with the County.  He is asking the Board today to consider agreeing to a set of stipulations that the BCC would expect to be in the interlocal agreement.  He said he has spoken with the Superintendent twice about some ideas and he has agreed to those.  He has met twice with the Principal and former Commissioner Morris sat in on one of the meetings and they came to points of agreement.  A sample type calendar was submitted to the Board that would have to be worked out.  Chairman Henley said they were trying to define the difference between school use, club use and community use.  They are trying to ensure that the community would have access to the pool.  He said it’s very difficult to negotiate an agreement when you don’t know what the facilities are going to be.  That would be the decisions of the School Board.  He thinks they need to come to agreement about what they want the contract to say.  The Superintendent wants to be able to use the contract to apply to any future partnerships regarding swimming pools.  He believes the Principal has agreed to everything and the agreement also designates that the School Board would provide dressing room facilities and those type things, and the funding from the County would go towards construction of the pool.  The County is also suggesting that a usage fee for the community be established to help pay for lifeguards.  Also suggested is if the pool is leased for profit by club use, that there be higher fees so the Booster Club might be able to make a small amount off that lease to help retire their $400,000 indebtedness.  He said he would like the Board to be able to adopt this and instruct the County Attorney to work the stipulations into the agreement and send it to the School Board for them to be able to move forward.

     Commissioner Dallari stated he had read the Chairman’s memo and also met with the school principal a couple times as well as staff.  He said he sees no reason why the Board should not move forward with this and send it to the County Attorney to get an agreement between the County and the School Board.

     Motion by Commissioner Dallari, seconded by Commissioner Van Der Weide, to move this item forward to the County Attorney to draft the agreement document for the Board’s approval.

     Commissioner Carey stated she also met with the school principal and former Commissioner Morris, and she also spoke with John Saboor with the Sports Commission regarding the possibility of having some time set aside during the summer and fall for competitive sports.  She said she would like to have something in the agreement about that. 

     Chairman Henley said the Joint City/County Group has a committee with the responsibility to recommend to the Sports Commission to make facilities available when they go after the national events.  He said the School Board has already agreed to that concept. 

     Principal Boyd Karns, Lake Mary High School, addressed the Board to state that would be applicable and he agreed the County could write that into the stipulations to be forwarded to the School Board.

     Commissioner Carey stated she received the agreements from Altamonte this week on how the Lake Brantley pool is operating and there is no accountability to the public of how the public funds are being spent.  That’s her problem with this.  This is public money and there is no accountability.  She said to her knowledge, the Lake Brantley pool has never been audited.  She said, philosophically, she has a problem with spending public funds and having a third party operating the facility.  If they are going to be in the pool business, then the government should operate them and make sure the children are taught how to swim and that it is not to the benefit of someone else.  She said she is not going to support this because, philosophically, she does not agree with what is being done.

     Chairman Henley said the stipulations are to avoid exactly what Lake Brantley is doing.  He said the Superintendent agrees that they need to change the way business has been done.  They are coming up with a model contract that would be applied to any other venture they might agree to.

     Commissioner Van Der Weide said he thinks the stipulations address a lot of the issues the Board discussed.  He also thinks Commissioner Carey has some valid points, but in the past, this Board has never wanted to get into the pool business.  He understands they can fine tune the agreement further if they find something that’s not working. 

     Chairman Henley clarified that the contract for usage will be with the School Board and not with the school so they will be able to have more control over that.  He thinks this will be a step in the right direction.

     Commissioner Dallari said he thinks it is duly noted that they make sure the facility is being used for public use.  Once they get the document back from the County Attorney, he would want to make sure all those details are ironed out. 

     Mr. McMillan asked for clarification that the Board wants to see the document before it is sent to the School Board.  Commissioner Dallari said yes.

     Mr. Karns said he and the Superintendent understands Commissioner Carey’s concern.  The facility use agreement is a School Board approved form and swimming pools will be added to the agreement. 

     Mr. McMillan noted that the agreement will have to go back to the city of Lake Mary because this will be a tri-party agreement.

     Districts 1, 2, 3, and 4 voted AYE.

     Commissioner Carey voted NAY.

County Manager's Consent Agenda

 

     Ms. Coto noted under the County Manager’s Briefing, staff is continuing Item #45, Water and Sewer CIP Program Management, and will bring that back on June 12, 2007, with some additional information.  She stated in the afternoon meeting session, she will have some additional comments regarding Item #48, Water Conservation Ordinance.

     Motion by Commissioner Dallari, seconded by Commissioner McLean, to approve and authorize the following:

Administrative Services

Facilities Maintenance

 8.  Approve and authorize the Chairman to execute an Agreement, as shown on page _______, with the Seminole County Health Department for renovation services for examination rooms, office space, reception area and storage areas. The amount for the renovation is $460,000.

 

Purchasing and Contracts

 9.  Award CC-1809-07/JOJ, as shown on page _______, in the amount of $125,687.79 to Schippers Marine Construction, Inc. of Crystal River, for all labor, equipment, transportation, coordination and incidentals related to repairs to boardwalks located near the Environmental Studies Center in the Spring Hammock Preserve.  

10.  Approve ranking list and authorize rate negotiations for PS-1742-07/BLH, preliminary and final design services, with Carter & Burgess, Inc. of Orlando, FL for rehabilitation of public infrastructure within selected residential subdivisions located in unincorporated Seminole County (not to exceed $500,000.00 per year).

 

Support Services

11.  Approve and authorize the Chairman to execute the County Deed, as shown on page _______, conveying the seventeen (17) Ridgewood Villa delinquent tax parcels as follows owned by the County to the City of Sanford, pursuant to Florida Statutes 197.592(3):  Parcel ID Nos. #02-20-30-521-0000-1030, Unit No. 103; #02-20-30-521-0000-1050, Unit No. 105; #02-20-30-521-0000-1100, Unit No. 110; #02-20-30-521-0000-1140, Unit No. 114; #02-20-30-521-0000-1170, Unit No. 117; #02-20-30-521-0000-1180, Unit No. 118; #02-20-30-521-0000-1200, Unit No. 120; #02-20-30-521-0000-1280, Unit No. 128; #02-20-30-521-0000-1290, Unit No. 129; #02-20-30-521-0000-1300, Unit No. 130; #02-20-30-521-0000-2110, Unit No. 211; #02-20-30-521-0000-2130, Unit No. 213; #02-20-30-521-0000-2170, Unit No. 217; #02-20-30-521-0000-2180, Unit No. 218; #02-20-30-521-0000-2200, Unit No. 220; #02-20-30-521-0000-2280, Unit No. 228; and #02-20-30-521-0000-2300, Unit No. 230.

12.  Approve and authorize the Chairman to execute the First Renewal, as shown on page _______, to Wilshire Plaza, Phase II Lease, leasing from the property owner, Crystal Bay Club, LTD., satellite offices located at 336 Wilshire Boulevard, Casselberry, FL, for the Tax Collector and the Clerk of the Courts, for a two-year term, in the amount of $86,033.16 for the first year and $88,614.12 for the second year.

 


Community Services

Administration  

13.  Approve continued participation in the Florida Department of Law Enforcement's "Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant Program" and authorize the Chairman to sign the Certificate of Participation, as shown on page _______, naming Dr. David Medley, Director of Community Services, to coordinate the applications.  

CDBG

14.  Authorize staff to publish the proposed list of HUD Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) and Emergency Shelter Grant (ESG) activities proposed to be funded for the 2007-2008 One-Year Action Plan of the 2005-2009 Five-Year Consolidated Plan, for a 30-day public comment period, prior to final approval by the Board.

Community Assistance

15.  Approve and authorize the Chairman to execute the Satisfactions, as shown on page _______, of Second Mortgage for households assisted under the SHIP Home Ownership Assistance Program and the Emergency Repair Housing Program as follows:  Leon N. Harp, Jr.; Janice Jones and Sharon Wheeler; Gena L. Lucas and the Lucas Family Trust; Sean Lee Toyloy; and Mary Holt (n/k/a Mary Guess.  

 

Economic Development

Tourism

16.  Approve and authorize the Chairman to execute an Agreement, as shown on page _______, with the city of Altamonte Springs/Altamonte Sports in the amount of $7,500 to sponsor the 2007 ASA Men’s Class B Fast Pitch National Championship to be hosted in Altamonte Springs.  

17.  Approve and authorize the Chairman to execute an Agreement, as shown on page _______, with the Central Florida Zoological Society, Inc. in the amount of $300,000 for operating and promotional expenditures.  

18.  Approve and authorize the Chairman to execute an Agreement, as shown on page _______, with the city of Sanford in the amount of $5,000 to sponsor the 2007 Golden Age Games.

 

Fiscal Services

Budget

19.  Approve and authorize the Chairman to execute Budget Amendment Resolution #2007-R-101, as shown on page _______, BAR #07-48, from the General Fund in the amount of $49,950 to provide funding for consulting services related to the automated performance management system.  

20.  Approve and authorize the Chairman to execute Budget Amendment Resolution #2007-R-102, as shown on page _______, BAR #07-58, from the 1991 Infrastructure Sales Tax Fund and Arterial Infrastructure Impact Fee Fund in the amount of $166,358 to fund the settlement for Longwood Green, Inc. v. Seminole County, Case No. 02-CA-1624-16-W.  

21.  Approve and authorize the Chairman to execute Budget Amendment Resolution #2007-R-103, as shown on page _______, BAR #07-63, from the General Fund in the amount of $460,000 for renovation of the Health Department Building with the State reimbursing funds from their trust funds from Fiscal Year 2006/07.

22.  Approve and authorize the Chairman to execute Budget Amendment Resolution #2007-R-104, as shown on page _______, BAR #07-67, from the General Fund in the amount of $100,000 to increase funding for the Central Branch Library HVAC Replacement project.  

23.  Approve and authorize the Chairman to execute Budget Change Request, BCR #07-16, from the Homeland Security Strategy Grant, as directed at the April 24, 2007 Board meeting, in the amount of $40,000 for the Roam Text Messaging System.  

MSBU

24.  Approve and authorize scheduling and advertising of a public hearing for the purpose of adopting the non-ad valorem assessment roll.

25.  Approve and authorize the Chairman to execute Satisfaction, as shown on page _______, of Lien documents for final close-out of the Chula Vista Road Restoration Municipal Services Benefit Unit.

26.  Adopt and authorize the Chairman to execute Resolution #2007-R-105, as shown on page _______, establishing the new assessment rate for each Municipal Service Benefit Unit (MSBU) that is required, as a condition of the MSBU's existence, to annually establish a revised assessment rate.

27.  Approve and authorize scheduling and advertising of a public hearing for amending Ordinance 06-74 by adding Parcel 17-21-29-511-0B00-0020 to the Mirror Lake Aquatic Weed Municipal Services Benefit Unit boundary.

 

Planning and Development

Development Review

28.  Approve and authorize the Chairman to execute the final plat for The Parke At Hanover Place, containing 85 townhome lots on a 9.7-acre parcel zoned PUD (Planned Unit Development), located on the south side of SR 434, west of Sun Shadow Boulevard, and approximately ¼ mile east of U. S. Hwy. 17-92, within the Sun Lake PUD, in Section 04, Township 21 S, Range 30 E (STEAM Properties, LLC, applicant).

Planning

29.  Approve and authorize the Chairman to execute the “Interlocal Agreement For Public Transit Services Between Seminole County and The Central Florida Regional Transportation Authority” (LYNX), as shown on page _______, for Fiscal Year 2007.  

 

Districts 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 voted AYE.

 

County Attorney's Consent Agenda

 

     Motion by Commissioner Carey, seconded by Commissioner Van Der Weide, to approve and authorize the following:


Litigation

30.  Kirchhoff, Coleman and Airport Industrial Partners, LLC, Property - Approve proposed mediated settlement relating to Parcel Numbers 221A, 721A, 821A, 221B, 721B, 721C, 721D, 821B, 821C, 221C, 721E, and 821D on the East Lake Mary Boulevard Phase IIB project. This proposed mediated settlement at $802,543.05 includes land value, severance damage, statutory interest, statutory attorney’s fees, expert fees and cost reimbursements.

31.  Lawlor Property - Authorize the issuance of an Offer of Judgment for Parcel I.D. Number 16-19-30-5AB-0030 that was acquired as a permanent access, drainage and utility easement for the Lockhart Smith Canal project, in an amount not to exceed $40,000.00.

32.  Longwood Green, Inc. - Approve proposed settlement of this inverse condemnation litigation at $150,000.00 inclusive for what is now known as Parcel Number 724, County Road 427 Phase III.

33.  Silver Lakes West Homeowners’ Association, Inc.’s Property - Approve proposed mediated settlement and authorization to convey Maintenance Easement, as shown on page _______, related to Parcel Numbers 120 and 820 on the Lake Emma Road project.  Also approve and authorize the Chairman to execute the Subdivision Wall Agreement, as shown on page _______, incidental to the proposed settlement.  The proposed settlement is at the total sum of $229,080.00 inclusive of all land value, statutory interest, attorney’s fees, and cost reimbursements.

34.  TWC Ninety-Five Ltd. Property - Approve proposed negotiated settlement relating to Parcel Number 108 on the Airport Boulevard Phase II project.  The proposed settlement is at the total sum of $47,628.00 inclusive of all land value, severance damage, business damage, statutory interest, attorney’s fees and cost reimbursements.

Property Acquisition

35.  Aldi Property - Authorize binding written offer/offer of judgment relating to Parcel 100A/B of the County Road 15 (Monroe Road) improvement project, located at 4160 W. State Road 46.

36.  Chairman to execute County Road 15 Subordination of Utility Interest Agreement, as shown on page _______, (Parcel Numbers 101C/101D), between Seminole County and BellSouth Telecommunications, Inc., in conjunction with the County Road 15 road improvement project.

37.  Chairman to execute County Road 15 Subordination of Utility Interest Agreement, as shown on page _______, (Parcel Number 141), between Seminole County and BellSouth Telecommunications, Inc., in conjunction with the County Road 15 road improvement project.

38.  Galloway Property - Approve and Chairman to execute Purchase Agreement, as shown on page _______, relating to Parcel Number 108 of the County Road 15 (Monroe Road) improvement project, located at 255 Monroe Road, Sanford, Florida, for $80,000.00, including attorney’s fees and costs.

 

Districts 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 voted AYE.

 

Constitutional Officers Consent Agenda

 

     Motion by Commissioner Van Der Weide, seconded by Commissioner Carey, to approve and authorize the following:

Clerk's Office

39.  Approve Expenditure Lists, as shown on page _______, dated April 23 & 30, 2007; approve Payroll Lists, as shown on page _______, dated April 19, 2007; approve BCC Official Minutes dated April 24, 2007; and noted, for information only, the following Clerk’s received and filed:

 

 1.  Recorded Transfer of Road Reservation, as shown on page _______, from the Board of Trustees of the Internal Improvement Trust Fund of the State of Florida regarding easement for State Road Right-of-Way 200.

 2.  Notice from the Public Service Commission of Order suspending proposed final rates and granting interim rate increase, Aqua Utilities Florida, Inc.

 3.  Work Order #6, as shown on page _______, to RFP-0225-05.

 4.  Work Order #68, as shown on page _______, to PS-5165-04.

 

 5.  Work Order #1, as shown on page _______, to PS-1501-06.

 6.  Change of Address notifications, as shown on page _______, regarding Letters of Credit for Grande Oaks (Heathrow Oaks, LLC), #55100119-00; Grande Oaks (Heathrow Oaks, LLC), #55100208-00; Magnolia Pointe (Sun Tec Builders, Inc. and MAG), #78531562-00; Magnolia Pointe (Sun Tec Builders, Inc. and MAG), #78531561-00; and Summerfield (Summerfield of Seminole County, Inc.), #55100380-00.

 7.  Work Order #3, as shown on page _______, for PS-1529-06.

 8.  Title Insurance Policy #A81-0182099; Recreational Trail Easement; Subordination, Consent and Joinder of Easement; and Amended Notice of Commencement regarding the Cross Seminole Trail, Phase III, Parcel No. 110, Landworks Group, LC, owner, as shown on page _______.

9.   Title Insurance Policy #A81-0266841; Recreational Trail Easement; and Subordination, Consent and Joinder of Easement for the Cross Seminole Trail, Phase III, Parcel No. 111, 1823 Longwood, Inc., owner, as shown on page _______.

10.  Title Insurance Policy; General Warranty Deed; Temporary Construction Easement; and Satisfaction of Mortgage for CR 15 (Monroe Road), Parcel No. 142/742, Charley Hodge and Cynthia Tibbetts, owners, as shown on page _______.

11.  Title Insurance Policy No. A81-0266844 and Recreational Trail Easement for the Cross Seminole Trail, Phase III, Parcel No. 106, Lo Bros. Enterprises, Inc., owner, as shown on page _______.

12.  Change Order #1, as shown on page _______, to Work Order #37 for CC-1262-05.

13.  Writ of Certiorari regarding Case No. 05-146-AP, Anne Rufiange vs. Value Adjustment Board of Seminole County.

14.  Cash Maintenance Bond, as shown on page _______, for water and sewer for South Bank, dba Orange Bank, (Nob Hill) in the amount of $630.

15.  Correct Exhibit A, Temporary Construction Easement, as shown on page _______, to Purchase Agreement, James A. and Linda A. Bulmer, CR 15.

16.  Work Order #73, as shown on page _______, to PS-556-00.

17.  Copy of memorandum to Ann Colby, Assistant County Attorney, from David G. Shields, Assistant County Attorney, regarding Basic Services Agreement request, Seminole County v. Sobik’s of Airport Blvd., Inc., et al.

18.  Work Orders #22, #23 and #24, as shown on page _______, to CC-1198-02.

19.  Amendment #1, as shown on page _______, to M-1479-06.

20.  Motorola Reconfiguration Planning Phase Agreement, as shown on page _______, as executed by the County Manager on April 20, 2007.

21.  Change Order #2, as shown on page _______, to CC-0256A-06.

22.  Work Order #69, as shown on page _______, to PS-5165-04.

23.  Amendment #1, as shown on page _______, to Work Order #11 for PS-5174-05.

24.  Amendment #1, as shown on page _______, to Work Order #18 for PS-5174-05.

25.  Work Order #2, as shown on page _______, to PS-5129-06.

26.  Customer Agreement, as shown on page _______, for Reclaimed Water Rates and Reclaimed Water Flow, Distribution, Delivery and Spray Easement for Norgart Farms, Melville and Billie Norgart.

27.  Amendment, as shown on page _______, to Conditional Utility Agreements for Water and Sewer Service with DBM Puddles.

28.  Conditional Utility Agreement, as shown on page _______, for Water Service with S & B Real Property, LLC.

29.  Conditional Utility Agreements, as shown on page _______, for Water and Sewer Service with Arthur Properties, LLC.

30.  Utility Agreements, as shown on page _______, for Water and Sewer Service with Verdelyte, LLC.

31.  Letter of acceptance and Bill of Sale, as shown on page _______, for the water and sewer systems for The Preserve at Eagle Lake.

32.  Conditional Utility Agreements, as shown on page _______, for Water and Sewer Service with CSC Properties, Inc.

33.  Conditional Utility Agreements, as shown on page _______, for Potable and Reclaimed Water and Sewer Service with Morrison Homes.

34.  Satisfaction of Connection Fees, as shown on page _______, for Fifth Third Bank.

35.  Assignment of Conditional Utility Agreements, as shown on page _______, for Water and Sewer Service with CWS-Oviedo Development, LLC, for the following projects:  CA Stone Properties, Restaurants A, B and C and CA Stone Properties - Bank.

36.  Letter of acceptance, Bill of Sale and Warranty Deed, as shown on page _______, for Potable and Reclaimed Water and Sewer systems for Clayton Crossing.

37.  Amendment #1, as shown on page _______, to M-0947-06.

38.  Work Order #46, as shown on page _______, to CC-1220-03.

39.  Basic Contract #M-2006-07, as shown on page _______, TLC Diversified, Inc.

40.  Development Orders, as shown on page _______, as follows:  Dan & Sarah Scrima, 1963 Kindling Court; Donna C. Stokes, Lots 390 & 391, Dunbar Avenue; Robert & Karen Beck, 1510 Royal Circle; Brian P. & Linda D. Caslow, 220 Lake Seminary Circle; Kenneth & Pauline Snyder, 5590 Lake Avenue; Thomas Madden, Lot 12, Scott Drive; Robert Dominica, 9722 Bear Lake Road; Richard & Maureen Berardo, Parcel 1N, Retreat Road; Mike Towers, Longwood Hills Condominium Rezone and Small Scale Land Use Amendment; Denial Development Order for Dale D. & Ellen D. Sherman, 220 Saunders Trail; Justin King, North and Pressview; Alfred Blankenship, Garage/Guest House; Greg & Bettina Fulford, 3821 Beardall Avenue; Xuan Nguyen & Nhan Phan, 724 Silver Birch Place; Denial Development Order for Mohammed & Vida Hosein, 3241 Night Breeze Lane; Lakeside Fellowship Church, 305 South Orange Boulevard; James Sada, 3016 Alafaya Trail; Spanish Oviedo Congregation of Jehovahs Witnesses, Inc., 1950 CR 426; Alberto G. Sosa, 576 Clemson Drive; Joseph Castello, 350 Lake Markham Road; Susan & William Kuhn, 752 Cross Bow Lane; Michael & Denise Sprigg, 2248 Catbriar Way; R & R Investments, Hickman Drive (Lot 9/I-4 Industrial Park); Garry Prickel, 5420 Lake Avenue; and Mark & Andrea Braunstein, Guest House.

41.  Notice from the Public Service Commission regarding Docket No. 060767-TP, Petition of McImetro Access Transmission Services, LLC, d/b/a Verizon Access Transmission Services.

42.  Certificate of Completion, as shown on page _______, for CC-1244-04.

43.  Certificates of Completion, as shown on page _______, for Work Orders #1 and #2 to CC-1284-06.

44.  Certificate of Completion, as shown on page _______, for Work Order #29 to CC-1262-05.

45.  Change Order #1, as shown on page _______, to CC-1220-03.

46.  Work Order #54, as shown on page _______, to CC-1262-05.

47.  Amendment #1, as shown on page _______, to PS-5150-03.

48.  Work Order #4, as shown on page _______, to CC-0012-05.

49.  Amendment #1, as shown on page _______, to Work Order #1 for PS-5183-05.

50.  Work Order #14, as shown on page _______, to PS-5175-04.

51.  Second Amendment, as shown on page _______, to IFB-3069-03.

52.  Amended Service Agreement, as shown on page _______, with Employee Benefits Corporation.

53.  Cash Maintenance Bond and Escrow Agreement, as shown on page _______, for The Rock of Central Florida, Inc. in the amount of $684.

54.  Maintenance Bond, as shown on page _______, for the Oviedo Professional Plaza in the amount of $3,246.

55.  Community Service Agency Agreement, as shown on page _______, with The Salvation Army.

56.  First Amendment, as shown on page _______, to IFB-3126-05.

57.  Work Order #34, as shown on page _______, to CC-1267-05.

58.  Change Orders #1, as shown on page _______, to Work Orders #51 and #52 for CC-1262-05.

59.  Agreement RFP-600137-07, as shown on page _______, with Profile East, Inc.

60.  Work Order #4, as shown on page _______, to PS-5169-04.

61.  Work Order #2, as shown on page _______, to PS-1501-06.

62.  Amendment #1, as shown on page _______, to Work Order #17 for PS-5190-05.

63.  Work Order #18, as shown on page _______, to PS-5190-05.

64.  Work Orders #6 and #7, as shown on page _______, to PS-5153-03.

65.  Change Order #2, as shown on page _______, to CC-0588-06.

66.  Work Order #4, as shown on page _______, to M-485-05.

67.  Amendment #1, as shown on page _______, to RFP-4125-01.

68.  Term Contract IFB-600160-07, as shown on page _______, Guardian Equipment, Inc.

69.  Term Contract IFB-600150-07, as shown on page _______, Southern Equipment.

70.  Term Contract IFB-600150-07, as shown on page _______, Peninsular Paper.

71.  Notice from the Public Service Commission regarding Order acknowledging the implementation of proposed agency action rates subject to refund, Alafaya Utilities, Inc.

72.  Customer Agreement, as shown on page _______, for Reclaimed Water Rates and Reclaimed Water Flow, Distribution, Delivery and Spray Easement with Fairwinds Credit Union SR 46.

73.  Conditional Utility Agreements, as shown on page _______, for Water and Sewer Service with Heathrow Country Club, LLC, and Fairwinds Credit Union.

74.  Letter of acceptance of the water system and Bill of Sale, as shown on page _______, for the project known as South Bank (dba Orange Bank).

75.  Developer’s Commitment Agreement, as shown on page _______, for Orange Boulevard PUD, KBC Development, Inc.

76.  Agreement RFP-600123-07, as shown on page _______, with PTFS, Inc.

77.  Performance and Payment Agreement and Letter of Credit #804948228700055, as shown on page _______, in the amount of $14,300 for Tuska (Tusca) Place.

78.  Amendment #6, as shown on page _______, to IFB-3089-04.

79.  Change Order #1, as shown on page _______, to Work Order #53 for CC-1262-05.

80.  Bids as follows:  PS-1905-07; RFP-600171-07; RFP-600166-07; CC-1949-07; and CC-1805-07.

Sheriff's Office

40.  Approve for the Sheriff's Office to execute and submit a grant application for redundant production infrastructure to the U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Assistance, and authorize the Sheriff to sign future documents relating to the grant.

 

     Upon inquiry by Commissioner Dallari, Chief Fleming, Sheriff’s Office, addressed the Board to advise the helicopter approved last year was delivered yesterday in Texas.  The Chief Pilot has been trained and will fly to debug it.  She expects the helicopter to be here on June 2.  The Bambi bucket will be here at the end of June.

     Districts 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 voted AYE.

 

Regular Agenda

 

     Meloney Lung, Support Services, addressed the Board to request approval and authorization for staff to schedule and advertise a public hearing for a presentation regarding FS125.379, Disposition of County property for affordable housing, which requires the County to approve an inventory list by July 1, 2007, and every three years thereafter of properties that can be used for affordable housing projects.

     Motion by Commissioner McLean, seconded by Commissioner Carey, to approve and authorize staff to schedule and advertise a public hearing for a presentation regarding FS125.379, Disposition of County property for affordable housing which requires the County to approve an inventory list by July 1, 2007, and every three years thereafter of properties that can be used for affordable housing projects.  

     Commissioner Carey asked if the list of properties shows removal of the two properties on Red Bug Road for a total of four available properties.  Ms. Lung said an updated list of the properties will be provided.

     Districts 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 voted AYE.

-------

     David Gregory, Acting Environmental Services Director, Gary Rudolph and Bob Briggs addressed the Board.  Mr. Gregory presented the request to approve and authorize implementation of the phased approach to the Cross Connection Control Plan which will include award of RFP-600062-06/BJC, Term Contract for Residential and Commercial Backflow Prevention Control Program, to Ace Flow Control, Longwood and authorize the Purchasing and Contracts Manager to execute the Agreement; authorize submission of the Cross Connection Control Plan to the Florida Department of Environmental Protection for its concurrence; and authorize modification to the Rate Resolution for Water, Sewer and Reclaimed Water to incorporate the Cross Connection Control Plan costs, with any rate changes to be brought back to the Board for approval at a later date.  Memorandum dated May 18, 2007, to the Commissioners providing additional information from Mr. Gregory was received and filed.

     Mr. Rudolph gave a PowerPoint (copy received and filed) slide presentation on the Cross Connection Control Program covering the topics of the History; Today; Phase 1 (FY 2007); Phase 2 (FY 2008); Phase 3 (FY 2009); Phase 4 (FY 2010); and Phase 5 (FY 2011). 

     Mr. Briggs continued the slide presentation with review of the Rate Information Countywide. 

     Mr. Rudolph concluded the presentation with the slide on the Cross Connection Control Program.  He said staff is recommending Board approval of the phased approach.

     Commissioner Carey advised she gave this information to Ms. Garfine with the Department of Environmental Protection and asked her to have her staff review it and make comments.  She said the Program Administrator, Christine Fararez (phonetic) responded to her and said, basically, DEP only requires the County to use dual check valves.  Commissioner Carey said the letter from DEP stating the County had not implemented its ordinance had to do with the fact that the County was not doing any surveys and inspections.  The ordinance has been in place since 1999, but the County has not yet implemented a program.  Her concern is that they are passing this cost on to the consumers, as it should be, but in some cases she thinks there are some things proposed to be done that are not necessarily required.  She reviewed what is required by DEP.  She said the Board is looking at about $1 million in recurring costs and the County is generating that by the program being presented.  She said she would like to see the program implemented like they are supposed to via DEP and done to meet the intent of the DEP rule and not necessarily have the “Cadillac” of all systems, which cost is being passed on to the consumers.

     Mr. Gregory stated he provided the Commissioners with a brief memo outlining where dual check valves could be used as opposed to a double check valve.  This is in cases where there is residential reclaimed and potable water.  He said staff’s biggest concern is those customers who have an irrigation system hooked up to the potable water supply.  They are required to have a more robust backflow preventive that does require testing.  He said this program is more aimed at those customers that have the irrigation systems that require the backflow prevention devices and the testing of those devices.  For the small amount of customers who have the residential reclaimed water, staff could consider offering the Board some scenarios modifying the cost connection program in those cases. 

     Commissioner Carey said the problem she has with this is when the Board adjusted the rates for the water and sewer program, they were told that staff would not be coming back to ask the Board for anything else and now here they are again asking the Board to approve another program that is going to account for another rate increase to pay for these reoccurring costs.  She said she would like to see a program that fits DEP requirements and fits the situation in Seminole County without doing the “Cadillac” because we’re going to pass the cost on to the consumer.

     Mr. Gregory stated he has been working with DEP for months to put this program together.  He believes they have a program, besides the very small number of reclaimed customers, that meets the bare minimum that DEP will accept.  That has been his intent from the very beginning.  He has had to add additional items to the presentation, because DEP said they were missing points. 

     Commissioner Carey reiterated that the DEP rules do not require anything more than a dual check valve.

     Ms. Coto stated when the Board heard the presentation in August, 2006, it was intended that the customers would be billed for the service by the contractor.  Staff was directed by the BCC to bring this program back for the Department of Environmental Services to take the responsibility for the program and not leave it at the discretion of the customer.  Staff was told to make this a part of the rate base.  It was not clear at that time as to whether this was to be absorbed as part of the existing rate structure or whether or not staff was to bring this back.  That’s why staff has restructured it this way. 

     Commissioner Carey stated she recalls the Board wanted to see what this would look like if it were to be done as part of the rate base versus paid for by the individual.  She said she did not anticipate another rate increase to cover any of the programs because the Board was told when they did the rate increase that this was going to cover anything they needed now and into the future. 

     Chairman Henley said they have two issues:  #1 is what is appropriate; and #2 is how to pay for it.  He asked the DEP representative to make comments.

     Kim Dodson, representative of DEP’s Drinking Water Program, addressed the Board to advise at the inspection of December 12, 2006, they found two significant deficiencies which were failure to develop a scheduling procedure for surveying and retrofitting of existing facilities, and failure to assure annual testing of backflow prevention assemblies.  She said she understood the largest part of the surveying and retrofitting had to do with residential, and her office is looking for the County to come back and comply to show they have surveyed those facilities to determine whether or not additional backflow prevention assemblies are required.  Beyond that, they require the annual testing of the testable backflow prevention assemblies.  She advised Chairman Henley that her office reviewed the staff recommendation and found that it brings the system into compliance.

     Commissioner Van Der Weide asked if this is overkill.  Ms. Dodson said it is not her position to review that. 

     Commissioner Carey asked if staff’s recommendation provides a level of service above what DEP requires.

     Ms. Dodson said she thinks the only issue they are getting at is the dual checks for the reclaimed water.  Based on the information the Board has, perhaps the annual is not necessarily required, and beyond that, it does meet minimum requirements. 

     Commissioner Dallari asked what would be the minimum acceptable intervals by DEP to inspect the dual check.  Ms. Dodson said every two to three years is an interval accepted with other utilities. 

     Ms. Coto said the majority of the customers today receive their irrigation water through the drinking water supply.  There is only a small percentage of customers who are on reclaimed water.  The Department can come back with a different program as it relates to the reclaimed water program.  That number is going to grow, but she doesn’t know if it will ever be to the level of customers that the County has overall.  She said the Board could bifurcate this program.  They could do the cross connection control for those who tap the drinking water supply and do a different program which would reduce the cost and have a different backflow prevention program for those customers on reclaimed water.

     Commissioner Carey said she thinks the idea to go back and bifurcate the program into two different systems and see what the cost looks like makes a lot more sense. 

     Mc. Coto clarified for the Board that this is for Seminole County utility customers only. 

     Chairman Henley suggested the Board continue this item and staff is to bifurcate the program and come back with an updated cost of that.

     Ms. Coto asked staff when they could be ready to come back to the Board.  She noted that she did not know what penalties, if any, are associated with being in noncompliance with DEP.  She said she wants to know how quickly staff can come back and resolve this issue. 

     Mr. Gregory said if the Board can tell them today if their preference for the reclaimed customers is to use residential dual checks on those units, they can modify the ordinance and put that in the ordinance.  If the Board authorizes staff to move forward with the rest of the proposal presented today, he thinks they can make that happen and try to come back in two weeks.  He said he would like to see them move forward on the majority of the program, which is getting the contractor on board so they can begin looking towards being in compliance.

     Upon inquiry by Commissioner Carey, Ms. Dodson said it is correct that the fact the County is making headway in trying to get this program, DEP will not levy any fines on the County.

     Ms. Coto directed staff to try to bring this item back on the agenda for June 12, 2007.

     Commissioner Carey also asked staff to bring some alternatives for the funding and can this funding be applied with the existing rate.

     Chairman Henley stated he thinks it is important for staff to bring back some budget information, particularly the balance being carried in contingency and that type of information.  He stated the item is continued to June 12 for staff to bring back the information requested and rewrite the proposal if necessary.

-------

 

     Austin Watkins, Planner, addressed the Board to present request to approve the Final Site Plan for Parcel B of the Cloyce Commercial Center Planned Commercial Development (PCD), and authorize the Chairman to execute Addendum #4 to the Cloyce Commercial Center PCD Developer’s Commitment Agreement, for a Fairwinds Credit Union, consisting of 1.38+ acres, located on the southeast corner of the intersection of Tuskawilla Road and Willa Springs Drive; Chip Nix/KDA Holdings, applicant.  He stated staff recommends approval of the PCD Final Site Plan and Addendum #4 to the Developer’s Commitment Agreement.

     Commissioner McLean clarified, for the Record, that a credit union with a drive-thru is an allowable use.

     Motion by Commissioner Dallari, seconded by Commissioner McLean, to approve the Final Site Plan for Parcel B of the Cloyce Commercial Center Planned Commercial Development (PCD), and authorize the Chairman to execute Addendum #4, as shown on page _______, to the Cloyce Commercial Center PCD Developer’s Commitment Agreement, for a Fairwinds Credit Union, consisting of 1.38+ acres, located on the southeast corner of the intersection of Tuskawilla Road and Willa Springs Drive, based on staff findings; Chip Nix/KDA Holdings, applicant.

     Districts 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 voted AYE.

-------

     Dick Boyer, Planner, addressed the Board to present request to approve and authorize the Chairman to execute a resolution to provide matching funds to LYNX to initiate the SR 434 CROSSTOWN service route starting in FY 2008/2009.  Mr. Boyer stated the resolution contains an “out” clause, which states should the Board find they do not have the money or wish not to pay for the revised bus route, they do not have to.  He advised staff received two public notices of support and received one notice yesterday in opposition (copies of letter and e-mail received and filed).  Also, the city of Longwood expressed interest and support (copy of e-mail received and filed) to hear more and would like to be kept in the pipeline for potentially sharing the cost.

     Commissioner McLean stated the flexibility seems to be on Lynx’s part as to opting out, and he doesn’t see anything in the resolution that says specifically if the County does not have the dollars available, the County can opt out.

     Mr. Boyer pointed out the “opt-out” language in the resolution and explained that Orange County used this similar agreement last year with the State understanding that it is whether the County has the money or if FDOT gets enough money.  This action is more a matter of saying who is of interest sufficiently to do a resolution and the funding will be resolved later.

     Mr. McMillan stated he does not see anything in the agreement that commits the County to matching funds at all.  It is saying the County expresses support for but is not a direct commitment to provide any particular funds at any particular time.

     Commissioner Carey said the fact is the Planning Department has a lot of input into the routes and into the funding that the County provides.

     Motion by Commissioner McLean, seconded by Commissioner Carey, to approve and authorize the Chairman to execute Resolution #2007-R-106, as shown on page _______, to provide matching funds to LYNX to initiate the SR 434 CROSSTOWN service route starting in FY 2008/2009, with the understanding of the funding as explained.

     Districts 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 voted AYE.

County Manager's Briefing

 

     Ms. Coto advised staff is continuing to June 12, 2007, the request for the Board to affirm the Program Management services by CH2M Hill (PS-5190-05/DRR) at a level of service consistent with direction provided at the July 18, 2006 Board of County Commissioners Work Session on the Water and Sewer Capital Improvements Program.  The Program Management budget is estimated $49.8 million over the projected five-year term of the program; and affirm CH2M Hill’s performance of detailed design and bid package preparation of the Seminole County Regional Surface Water Treatment Plant at Yankee Lake consistent with the County’s Cost Sharing Agreement with the St. Johns River Water Management District per direction provided at the July 18, 2006 Work Session.

-------

     Dori DeBord, Planning and Development Director, presented the request to the Board to direct staff to reserve the Fall 2008 Large Scale Amendment Cycle for EAR-based amendments only (no other amendments to be heard nor application processed during that cycle), post the schedule in the Building Division and Customer Resource Center areas, and post the 2008 and 2009 Large Scale Amendment Schedule on the County website.  She explained staff is asking the Board to hold off on accepting private applications for one amendment cycle while staff does all the Comprehensive Plan amendments that have to go at the same time. 

     Commissioner Carey asked Ms. DeBord what is the plan to notify the development community and property owner community of the change that they would not be able to come in on the fall cycle.  Ms. DeBord explained how staff intends to post the schedule.  

     Chairman Henley also suggested putting the notices on SGTV.

     Commissioner Carey said she thinks it is important to provide notice because everyone in the industry who does large use land amendments know that it is only twice a year that it can be done.  Taking out one cycle means that would be a pretty good gap for the public to go through the process.

     Ms. DeBord said she is concerned about making sure the amendments have the proper amount of review and procedural documentation as they go through the process.

     Motion by Commissioner Carey, seconded by Commissioner McLean, to direct staff to reserve the Fall 2008 Large Scale Amendment Cycle for EAR-based amendments only (no other amendments to be heard nor application processed during that cycle); post the schedule in the Building Division and Customer Resource Center areas; and post the 2008 and 2009 Large Scale Amendment Schedule on the County website; hand out colored-paper notices of the schedule to all who come to the Department; and give notice of the schedule on SGTV.

     Districts 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 voted AYE.

-------

     Chairman Henley recessed the meeting at 12:04 p.m., reconvening at 1:38 p.m., this same date with all Commissioners and all other Officials, with the exception of Deputy Clerk Carylon Cohen, who was replaced by Deputy Clerk Sandy McCann, who were present at the Opening Session. 

PROOF OF PUBLICATION

     Motion by Commissioner Van Der Weide, seconded by Commissioner Carey to authorize the filing of the proofs of publication for this meeting’s scheduled public hearings. 

     Districts 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 voted AYE. 

PUBLIC HEARINGS

 

REQUEST TO VACATE & ABANDON,

DAVID & NICOLE WRIGHT

 

     Proof of publication, as shown on page _______, calling for a public hearing to consider a request to vacate and abandon a portion of the platted drainage easement at the rear of the property located at 3867 Tucks Point, Winter Park, further described as Lot 5, Tuck’s Knoll, in Section 24, Township 21S, Range 30E, David & Nicole Wright, received and filed. 

     Cynthia Sweet, Development Review, addressed the Board to present the request, advising the vacate will accommodate a swimming pool and pool enclosure and prevent an encroachment into the easement.  She said the owners have provided a letter from the Tuck’s Knoll Homeowners Association stating no objection to the request.  She further advised the staff recommends approval of the vacate request. 

     No one spoke in support or in opposition. 

     Motion by Commissioner Dallari, seconded by Commissioner McLean to adopt appropriate Resolution #2007-R-107, as shown on page _______, vacating and abandoning a portion of the platted drainage easement at the rear of the property located at 3867 Tucks Point, Winter Park, further described as Lot 5, Tuck’s Knoll, in Section 24, Township 21S, Range 30E, as described in the proof of publication, David & Nicole Wright. 

     Districts 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 voted AYE. 

REQUEST FOR CONSIDERATION OF

WATER CONSERVATION ORDINANCE

 

     Proof of publication, as shown on page _______, calling for a public hearing to consider an Ordinance amending Part 5, Chapter 270 of the Seminole County Code entitled “Emergency Water Conservation Ordinance”; creating Section 270.259 and 270.260 of the Seminole County Code entitled “Emergency Water Conservation Ordinance”; and rescinding the Emergency Water Shortage Resolution #2001-R-13, received and filed. 

     Acting Environmental Services Director, David Gregory, addressed the Board to refer to his Memorandum (copy received & filed) dated May 18, 2007, advising the Environmental Services staff has met with the County Attorney’s Office and made revisions to the ordinance to apply restrictions Countywide and to include enforcement mechanisms that follow Chapter 53 of the Code for Code Enforcement.  Because of those changes, staff is asking authorization to readvertise the ordinance for public hearing. 

     Commissioner Carey stated she doesn’t have a problem with the ordinance and would like to see the County and Cities who irrigate their medians in violation be treated just like the citizens. 

     No one spoke in support or in opposition. 

     Motion by Commissioner McLean, seconded by Commissioner Carey to authorize staff to readvertise and reschedule a public hearing to consider the Water Conservation Ordinance.

     Districts 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 voted AYE. 


CONSIDERATION OF AN ORDINANCE INCREASING

HOMESTEAD EXEMPTION FOR LOW INCOME SENIORS

 

     Proof of publication, as shown on page _______, calling for a public hearing to consider an Ordinance amending the Seminole County Code, Section 245.123, Entitlement to Additional Homestead Exemption, to increase the additional homestead exemption for low income senior citizens from $25,000 to $50,000, received and filed. 

     Lin Polk, Budget Manager, addressed the Board to present the Ordinance. 

     Chairman Henley advised this will be decreasing the County’s revenues by over $600,000. 

     Commissioner Van Der Weide stated this was voted upon by the citizens of the County and he doesn’t see how the Board can do anything but adopt the Ordinance. 

     No one spoke in support or in opposition. 

     Motion by Commissioner Van Der Weide, seconded by Commissioner Carey to adopt Ordinance #2007-17, as shown on page _______, amending the Seminole County Code, Section 245.123, Entitlement to Additional Homestead Exemption, to increase the additional homestead exemption for low income senior citizens from $25,000 to $50,000, as described in the proof of publication. 

     Districts 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 voted AYE. 

LEGISLATIVE UPDATE

     Assistant County Attorney, Susan Dietrich, addressed the Board to give a brief update on the Legislative Session, advising the Special Session on Property Tax Reform is scheduled for June 12 through 22.  Also, to be discussed is Kid Care and Health Insurance issues.  She reviewed the Action Report (copy received & filed).  She advised Bill #529, Cable TV, was signed into law by the Governor on May 18.  Senate Bill 921, Emergency Communications, was sent to the Governor on May 17.  Also, Bill #1026, Homestead Exemption for Disabled Veterans, and Bill #2162, Local Government Funding, were sent to the Governor on May 17. 

CHAIRMAN’S REPORT

     Chairman Henley advised the Seminole County Purchasing & Contracts Division was been awarded the Best Practice in Purchasing Award for 2007 and the Award of Excellence.  He congratulated the employees for this recognition. 

-------

     Chairman Henley advised the County Manager’s annual review is due and he has said he would attempt to bring Ms. Coto up closer to some of the other county managers in the region.  He said he brought Ms. Coto in a little low last year, therefore, he is recommending a 7% increase on her base salary. 

     Motion by Commissioner McLean, seconded by Commissioner Dallari to approve a 7% increase on the base salary for County Manager, Cindy Coto. 

     Under discussion, Commissioner Carey stated she does believe Ms. Coto is doing a great job, but in light of what is going on in Tallahassee, she would not be interested in supporting a 7% increase for any employee.  She pointed out that when the Chairman negotiated Ms. Coto’s contract last year, it was an increase from what the County was paying the previous County Manager at that time.  She stated that many employees have done a great job, but certainly are not going to expect this kind of increase in their paycheck. 

     Chairman Henley stated what Ms. Coto has done deserves this kind of compensation. 

     Commissioner Van Der Weide also agreed Ms. Coto has done a wonderful job; but he is concerned about the state of flux in Tallahassee.  He suggested putting off this decision until after the Special Legislative Session. 

     Chairman Henley stated Ms. Coto’s anniversary date has already passed. 

     Commissioner Van Der Weide reiterated that this is not good timing; and said when the Board does make a decision, the increase would be retroactive to her anniversary date.  He added that it is not a question of whether she deserves it or not, but he believes it is the timing and the creditability with the voters. 

     Commissioner Carey pointed out that there is a hiring freeze on and the Board needs to look at what they are going to do for the rest of the employees. 

     Motion by Commissioner Carey, seconded by Commissioner Van Der Weide to table discussion and consideration of the County Manager’s annual pay increase until June 26, 2007. 

     Districts 1, 3 and 5 voted AYE. 

     Commissioners McLean and Henley voted NAY. 

DISTRICT COMMISSIONERS’ REPORTS

     Commissioner Dallari briefly discussed the Lee Ranch and the meetings he has had with Mr. Lee and the St. Johns River Water Management District. 

-------

     Commissioner Dallari stated he has had several calls from Chuluota residents about the rate increase and water quality of Aqua Utilities.  He said he has referred the residents to the PSC. 

     Chairman Henley advised the Health Department can test the water.  He added that he also has been receiving some calls on this. 

-------

     Commissioner Dallari advised Kids House has been recognized by Walt Disney World and has received the Bob Allen Award for community service. 

-------

     Commissioner McLean advised Jason Brodeur has resigned from the Planning & Zoning Commission and he would like to appoint Melanie Chase to replace him. 

     Motion by Commissioner McLean, seconded by Commissioner Carey to appoint Melanie Chase to the Planning & Zoning Commission for the remainder of the 4-year term of Jason Brodeur, ending January 1, 2008. 

     Under discussion, Attorney McMillan advised Ms. Chase is an alternate on the Board of Adjustment; and, therefore, cannot serve on both boards. 

     Commissioner McLean withdrew his motion, stating he will contact Ms. Chase to see what she wants to do. 

     Commissioner Carey withdrew her second to the motion. 

-------

     Commissioner McLean acknowledged that today is the last day of school and he congratulated all the graduates. 

-------

     Commissioner McLean advised of the fundraiser for Dakota Clancy (daughter of Tony Clancy of Public Works) stating the employees raised $3,300. 

-------

     Commissioner McLean reminded everyone that this weekend is Memorial Day and he acknowledged all the veterans for their service to this Country. 

-------

     Commissioner Van Der Weide requested Board approval to set up a 501C3 non-profit corporation in order to help raise funds for the Hero’s Memorial. 

     Motion by Commissioner Van Der Weide, seconded by Commissioner McLean to authorize the County Attorney to work on establishing a 501C3 non-profit corporation for the Hero’s Memorial. 

     Under discussion, County Attorney McMillan advised a trust fund could be created, such as the funds for Libraries, Natural Lands, and Animal Services.  He said the non-profit corporation has to be formed through the IRS.  Discussion ensued. 

     Commissioner Van Der Weide stated he wants to make sure that this stays a County project and that the County maintains control of it. 

     Districts 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 voted AYE. 

-------

     Commissioner Van Der Weide requested authorization to pursue the “Officer Down” grants for the Hero’s Memorial, subject to the County Manager’s approval. 

     The Board voiced no objections to same. 

-------

     Commissioner Van Der Weide stated he believes there are problems with the County’s computer leasing program and the Buy Back Program.  He relayed to the Board his experience with the Buy Back Program (computers) about being over charged, double charged, and not receiving the computer.  He said he has received a letter from the Pomeroy Company stating they cannot do anything about getting his money credited on his credit card. 

     Ms. Coto advised staff has spoken to Pomeroy and they have agreed to change their policy. 

     Director of Information Services, Colleen Rotella, addressed the Board to advise she has spoken to the Vice President of Pomeroy and he has committed to changing the policy so this situation will not happen again. 

     Commissioner Van Der Weide stated he does not like the way this company is dealing with the staff.  Whereupon, Ms. Rotella stated she will have further discussions with the Vice President in the near future. 

-------

     Commissioner Van Der Weide advised the Port Authority has earmarked $1 million to come to the County, with a request that $150,000 of that be contributed to the Small Business Program at SCC. 

-------

     Commissioner Henley advised his seven-year-old granddaughter has been elected President of her class. 

-------

     Commissioner Carey advised recently MetroPlan Orlando rejected a resolution (by an 8 to 8 vote) that would encourage cities and counties to install red light cameras.  She stated that Chairman Henley and she voted against this resolution because they do not believe MetroPlan should pass something like that.  She said everyone agrees that red light running is a problem, but she does not believe the cameras are the answer.  She further advised studies have shown that by adding an additional second to the yellow light, it has dramatically reduced the number of red light runners.  Therefore, she requested staff look into the timing of yellow lights in Seminole County. 

     No one voiced any objections to same. 

-------

     Commissioner Carey suggested Commissioners who serve on regional boards discuss the possibility of budget cuts pending the action by the State on Property Tax Reform. 

-------

     Commissioner Carey advised there will be a Memorial Day parade and ceremony in Sanford on May 28, 2007. 

-------

     Commissioner McLean advised Ms. Chase has indicated that she will resign from the Board of Adjustment in order to serve on the Planning & Zoning Commission. 

     Motion by Commissioner McLean, seconded by Commissioner Carey to appoint Melanie Chase to the Planning & Zoning Commission to serve the remaining term of Jason Brodeur, term ending January 1, 2008. 

     Districts 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 voted AYE. 

COUNTY MANAGER’S REPORT

     Ms. Coto asked for direction with regard to Federal and State Lobbyist Agreements (copy of Memorandum dated May 16, 2007 from April Boswell was received & filed). 

     Chairman Henley stated he would like to delay consideration of the Federal Lobbyist renewal until closer to August. 

     Motion by Commissioner Van Der Weide, seconded by Commissioner Dallari to delay consideration of the renewal of the Federal Lobbyist Agreement with Alcalde & Fay at this time. 

     Districts 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 voted AYE. 

     Discussion ensued with regard to the State Lobbyist Agreement.  Ms. Coto advised this agreement is expiring in November and based on a 125-day selection process, she believes the staff needs Board direction on how to proceed. 

     The Board voiced no objections to staff proceeding with the preparation of an RFP for the State Lobbyist. 

COUNTY ATTORNEY’S REPORT

     County Attorney, Robert McMillan, advised yesterday Judge Nelson ruled that the three Charter Amendments challenged by the Constitutional Officers are unconstitutional.  He said the Board does not need to make a decision on whether to appeal or not until a written order is received from the Judge, which will be about the middle of June. 

COMMUNICATIONS AND/OR REPORTS

     The following Communications and/or Reports were received and filed: 

 1.  Memorandum dated 05/14/07 to BCC from Chairman re: County Manager evaluation.

 

 2.  Memorandum dated 05/14/07 to BCC from Jennifer Bero, Grants Administrator, re: Cultural Facilities grant.

 

 3.  Copy of Executive Order No 2007-2 declaring local State of Emergency.

 

 4.  Memorandum dated 05/11/07 to BCC (with attachments) from Cindy Coto, Co. Manager, re:  Shane Kelly Park and equestrian uses.

 

 5.  Letter dated 05/10/07 to Chairman from Diane Pickett Culpepper, Bright House, re:  Changes to Bright House network’s channel lineup.

 

 6.  Memorandum dated 05/08/07 to BCC (with attachments) from Cindy Coto, Co. Manager, re: Additional homestead exemption for low-income seniors.

 

 7.  Copy of memorandum dated 05/09/07 to Cindy Coto, Co. Manager, from Sandy McCann, Commission Records Supervisor, re:  Outstanding BCC documents.

 

 8.  Memorandum dated 05/02/07 to BCC (with attachments) from Cindy Coto, Co. Manager, re:  The Oaks Shopping Center located on Lake Mary Boulevard/Longwood-Lake Mary Road property swap.

 

 9.  Copy of letter dated 05/03/07 to Property Owner from Charles Senzee, Planner-City of Casselberry, re: Notification of proposed Future Land Use Map amendments meeting on May 9, 2007. 

 

10.  Letter dated 04/30/07 to Chairman (with attachments) from John Sabor, President, and Keith Station, Seminole Co. Sports Marketing Manager-Central Florida Sports Commission, re:  Activities in April and March Activities Report.

 

11.  Notice and agenda for Seminole Co. Port Authority meeting on May 16, 2007.

 

12.  Contract for services, as shown on page _______, between Seminole Co. Government and the following:  Donald McCoy (Umpire Hooter’s Championship Series); Steven Seither (Umpire Hooter’s Championship Series); Brian Morris (Umpire Hooter’s Championship Series); Ray Schleichkorn (Umpire Hooter’s Championship Series); Michelle Chapman (Scorekeeper Hooter’s Championship Series); Sandra Field (Score Keeper Hooter’s Championship Series); Martin Koller (Score Keeper Hooter’s Championship Series); Lawana Stewart (Scorekeeper, Hooter’s Championship Series); Loy Awerey, Jr. (Umpire Slow Pitch Softball); Martin Koller (Umpire Slow Pitch Softball); and Martin Koller (Scorekeeper).

 

13.  Letter dated 05/15/07 to BCC (with attachments) from Cynthia Porter, Deputy City Clerk-City of Sanford, re: Notice for annexation meeting on June 11, 2007.  (cc:  Co. Manager, Deputy Co. Manager, Co. Attorney, Planning & Development Director, Property Appraiser, Supervisor of Elections).

 

14.  Letter dated 05/18/07 to Chairman (with attachments) from Dagmarie Segarra, Planning-City of Lake Mary, re: Notification of voluntary annexation-HIBC DRI/Colonial Realty meetings on June 21, 2007; July 5, 2007 or July 12, 2007. (cc:  Co. Manager, Deputy Co. Manager, Co. Attorney, Planning & Development Director, Property Appraiser, Supervisor of Elections).

 

15.  Letter dated 05/11/07 to Chairman from Governor Charlie Crist re:  Seminole Co. History-Education Multi Purpose Program Building funding request.  (cc:  BCC, Co. Manager, Deputy Co. Manager, Library Director, Museum Director)

 

16.  Letter dated 05/16/07 to BCC (with attachments) from Joyce Kent, Administrative Specialist-City of Sanford, re:  Notice for annexation meeting on June 11, 2007.   (cc:  Co. Manager, Deputy Co. Manager, Co. Attorney, Planning & Development Director, Property Appraiser, Supervisor of Elections).

 

17.  Letter dated 05/14/07 to BCC from E. Everett Huskey, President-Huskey Development Co., re:  Traffic along Wekiva Springs Road in front of Sabal Elementary School.

 

18.  Letter dated 05/14/07 to BCC from E. Everett Huskey, President-Huskey Development Co., re:  Right turn lane only signing on Wekiva Springs Road.

 

19.  Memorandum dated 05/16/07 to Department Directors and Managers from Cindy Coto, Co. Manager, re:  Temporary hiring freeze.

 

20.  Memorandum dated 05/15/07 to BCC from Cindy Coto, Co. Manager, re:  Acting Co. Manager during absence.

 

21.  Contract for services, as shown on page _______, between Seminole Co. Government and the following:  Arlee Jackson (Umpire Hooter’s Championship Series); Richard-John Vazquez (Umpire Hooter’s Championship Series); and Clyde Graham (Umpire Hooter’s Championship Series).

 

22.  Copy of letters dated 05/11/07 from T.E. Stone, Director of Public Safety, re:  Appreciation for recent donations to the following:  Maureen Bryarly; Barbara Jackson; Don Folendore; Nancy Pelky; Tonya Bachand; James & Paula Peddie; Marc & Nancy Rosengold; Wolny & Slanda Pa; Linda Phipps; and Allyson Pitts.

 

CITIZENS INPUT

     Joanne Lucarelli, Lake Mary, addressed the Board to request the bus service on Lake Mary Boulevard be expanded to Sundays and holidays. 

DISTRICT COMMISSIONERS’ REPORTS, CONTINUED

     Motion by Commissioner McLean, seconded by Commissioner Dallari to adopt appropriate Resolution #2007-R-108, as shown on page _______, commending Jason Brodeur for his service on the Planning & Zoning Commission. 

     Districts 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 voted AYE. 

-------

     There being no further business to come before the Board, the Chairman adjourned the meeting at 2:42 p.m., this same date. 

 

 

ATTEST:_____________________Clerk_____________________Chairman

cc/slm