BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS

SEMINOLE COUNTY, FLORIDA

JUNE 24, 2008

 

     The following is a non-verbatim transcript of the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS MEETING OF SEMINOLE COUNTY, FLORIDA, held at 9:30 a.m., on Tuesday, June 24, 2008, in the SEMINOLE COUNTY SERVICES BUILDING at SANFORD, FLORIDA, the usual place of meeting of said Board.

     Present:

     Chairman Brenda Carey (District 5)

     Vice Chairman Michael McLean (District 2)

     Commissioner Bob Dallari (District 1)

     Commissioner Carlton Henley (District 4)

     Commissioner Dick Van Der Weide (District 3)

     County Manager Cindy Coto

     County Attorney Robert McMillan

     Deputy Clerk Eva Roach

 

     The Invocation was given by Father Richard Trout, Jr., All Souls Catholic Church, Sanford.

     Cindy Coto, County Manager, led the Pledge of Allegiance.

AWARDS & PRESENTATIONS

     Motion by Commissioner McLean, seconded by Commissioner Dallari to adopt appropriate Resolution #2008-R-146, as shown on page ________, recognizing Clarence Elswick for 15 years of service to Seminole County and its citizens upon his retirement on June 27, 2008.

     Districts 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 voted AYE.

     The Board presented the Resolution to Mr. Elswick who addressed the Board to express his appreciation.

-------

     Motion by Commissioner Dallari, seconded by Commissioner McLean to adopt appropriate Resolution #2008-R-148, as shown on


page ________, recognizing James J. Harding for 19 years of service to Seminole County and its citizens upon his retirement on June 30, 2008.

Districts 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 voted AYE.

     The Board presented the Resolution to Mr. Harding, who addressed the Board to express his appreciation.

-------

     Motion by Commissioner Henley, seconded by Commissioner McLean to adopt appropriate Resolution #2008-R-147, as shown on page _________, recognizing Donald J. Mietz for 32 years of service to Seminole County and its citizens upon his retirement on June 27, 2008.

     Districts 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 voted AYE.

     The Board presented the Resolution to Albert English, who addressed the Board to express his appreciation on behalf of Mr. Mietz.

-------

     Dori DeBord, Planning & Development Director, addressed the Board to introduce Bill Owen, Real Estate Research Consultants (RERC), and to commend RERC for doing a very admirable job on the SeminoleWay study.

     Bill Owen, President of Real Estate Research Consultants, addressed the Board to highlight some of the things that are important and to address the initiatives of SeminoleWay.  He displayed a PowerPoint presentation (not received and filed) and reviewed the SeminoleWay general corridor over 40 miles long with eight interchanges.  He reviewed the Mission and the Study Area Challenges showing seven interchanges consisting of 3700 acres of undeveloped property, 25% or less in Large Tracts, Restricted Access to SR 417, and Limited Parallel Roads.  He stated the approach to the project is in two tiers (Tier 1, Industry and Facility Analysis, and Tier 2, Strategic Corridor Analysis).  The analysis of Tier 1 consists of the County hiring RERC to conduct the study, the first tier completed by April 2008, presentation to the Board on June 24, 2008, and the full report and executive summary to be on the County’s web site and TFP site.  He reviewed the results of the Industry and Facility Analysis showing 12 Metro Orlando Industry Clusters being defined.  He displayed and reviewed a diagram showing the Competitive MSA Cluster, Seminole Support Cluster and Seminole MSA Advantage.  He also displayed a map showing the northern half of the SeminoleWay corridor.  He reviewed five Tier 1 recommendations as outlined on Page 13 of the Summary.  He concluded by reviewing the Strategic Corridor Analysis of Tier 2 as well as the Time Table.

     Chairman Carey stated she feels they have a great value for the investment they have made thus far.  The request is to move forward with Phase 2.  She stated she knows the cities of Sanford, Oviedo and Winter Springs have delivered checks to pay for the second phase. 

     Commissioner McLean said he has been involved with the SeminoleWay process almost from the beginning and he would like to compliment RERC for their work as well as the cities of Oviedo, Winter Springs and Sanford. 

     Commissioner Van Der Weide stated he feels it would be a no brainer to continue this.  The County has paid their money up front and since the cities will be participating in the next phase, he feels they should move forward.

     Commissioner Henley stated he understands that staff is asking authorization to continue with Phase II.

     Chairman Carey advised this is on the Consent Agenda as Item #14.

COUNTY MANAGER’S CONSENT AGENDA

     Cindy Coto, County Manager, addressed the Board to advise letters of opposition, petitions and e-mails were submitted for Item #29, Adopt Resolution changing the name of Lake Drive and E. Lake Drive.

     Commissioner Dallari requested that Item #29 be pulled for a separate vote.

     David Medley, Community Services Director, discussed with Commissioner McLean if there is a possibility of using the Edward Byrne Memorial Juvenile Assistance Grant (Item #16) money to help the non-profit entities that the County is struggling to fund.

     Chairman Carey stated Mr. Medley can come back with some ideas on that program.

     Upon inquiry by Chairman Carey relating to Item #18, Authorize scheduling public hearings to consider designation of unincorporated land within US 17-92 CRA, John Metsopoulos, Economic Development, addressed the Board to advise every  property owner affected, as well as residents living within 300 ft. of the Brownfield/SEED area, will be notified of the public hearing.

     Commissioner Dallari stated he has attended some of the community meetings and everyone has been talking positive about the program.

     Motion by Commissioner Henley, seconded by Commissioner McLean to authorize and approve the following:

County Manager’s Office

5.  Adopt appropriate Resolution #2008-R-149, as shown on page ________, proclaiming the week of July 13 through July 19, 2008 as Adult and Juvenile Probation Officer's Week.

6.  Adopt appropriate Resolution #2008-R-150, as shown on page _________, proclaiming the month of July as Recreation and Parks month and encouraging all citizens to celebrate by participating in their recreational program of choice and by visiting a trail or park during the month.

 

Administrative Services

Purchasing and Contracts

7.  Award CC-3075-08/VFT, as shown on page ________, in the amount of $290,350.00 to U.S. Water Services Corporation of New Port Richey, Florida, for all labor, materials, equipment, tools, transportation, services and incidentals required for the installation of a new pump station to replace the Apple Valley Pump Station.

8.  Award CC-3076-08/DRR, as shown on page ________, in the amount of $524,347.95 to Cathcart Contracting Co., of Winter Springs, Florida, for all labor, material, equipment, transportation, coordination and incidentals necessary to complete the installation of approximately 4,400 linear feet of 16-inch potable water main extension and a 2-inch fiber optic conduit to run the length of Longpond Road between Interstate 4 to the east and Markham Woods Road to the west.

9.  Award RFP-600409-08/GMG, as shown on page ________, Term Contract for Mosquito Control Aerial Larviciding Services to Vector Disease Control, Inc., DeWitt, Arkansas.

10.  Approve First Amendments, as shown on page ________, to CC-1284-06/TLR with Central Florida Environmental of Longwood, Florida; Conpilog International Co. of Altamonte Springs, Florida; Stage Door II of Apopka, Florida; and AJC Construction LLC of Orlando, Florida; to add additional Pay Items as identified in the revised Exhibit C included within the Amendment for each Contractor.  In addition, approve an extension to the existing Agreement term by an additional two (2) year base period, with two (2) 1-year each renewals.  

11.  Approve Work Order #77, as shown on page _________, to PS-5150-03/AJ - Master Agreement for General Environmental Services in the amount of $118,726.64 with EMS Scientists, Engineers, Planners, Inc., Altamonte Springs, Florida.

12.  Approve ranking list and authorize staff to negotiate rates for PS-3018-08/JV - Continuous Construction Engineering and Inspection Services for Midway Regional Stormwater Facility and FDOT Embankment Project with Dyer, Riddle, Mills and Precourt Inc., of Orlando, Florida (Estimated usage amount of $490,000.00 over the term of the Agreement).

13.  Approve an increase to the Board approved Estimated Annual Usage for RFP-4214-04/TLR - Security Repairs, Maintenance and Upgrades Agreement by an additional $500,000.00 per year.

14.  Approve Phase 2 of M-600317-08/BJC - Consultant Services Agreement for SeminoleWay Corridor Analysis with Real Estate Research Consultants, Orlando.

Community Services

Administration

15.  Authorize the Chairman to approve the nominees, as shown on page _______, for appointment to the Committee on Aging.

16.  Approval by the Board of County Commissioners to continue participation in the Florida Department of Law Enforcement's Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant (JAG) Program and authorization for the Chairman to sign Certificate of Participation, as shown on page _________, naming David Medley, Ph.D., Director of Community Services, to coordinate the applications.

Community Assistance

17.  Approve and authorize the Chairman to execute the Community Services Block Grant (CSBG) Contract, as shown on page _________, between the Florida Department of Community Affairs and Seminole County in the amount of $230,521.00.

 

Economic Development

Operations

18.  Authorize the Economic Development Department to schedule and advertise a public hearing to consider the designation of unincorporated land within Seminole County's U.S. 17-92 Community Redevelopment Area (CRA) as a Brownfield/SEED area.

 

Environmental Services

Business Office

19.  Approve Release, as shown on page _________, of Water & Sewer Capacity between Seminole County and CDG Heathrow, LTD., for the project known as CDG Heathrow (f/k/a Lakeview at Heathrow).

 

Fiscal Services

Administration

20.  Approval to resubmit a grant application to the U.S. Department of Homeland Security requesting $2,601,120.00 through their SAFER Grant Program, and authorize the County Manager to execute supporting documents.

Budget

21.  Approve and authorize the Chairman to execute appropriate Resolution #2008-R-151, as shown on page _________, implementing Budget Amendment Request (BAR) #08-65 through the Public Safety Grants Other Fund in the amount of $5,000.00 to establish funding for the Safe Kids Coalition Grant.

22.  Approve and authorize the Chairman to execute appropriate Resolution #2008-R-152, as shown on page __________, implementing Budget Amendment Request (BAR) #08-69 through the 2001 Infrastructure Sales Tax Fund in the amount of $201,381.00 eliminating a duplication of funding sources for the Waste Reduction and Recycling Grant.

23.  Approve and authorize the Chairman to execute appropriate Resolution #2008-R-153, as shown on page __________, implementing Budget Amendment Request (BAR) #08-70 through the 2001 Infrastructure Sales Tax Fund in the amount of $1,178,436.00 related to the State Road 436 at Red Bug Lake Road Intersection project.

24.  Approve and authorize the Chairman to execute appropriate Resolution #2008-R-154, as shown on page __________, implementing Budget Amendment Request (BAR) #08-71 through the 1991 Infrastructure Sales Tax and the Arterial Transportation Impact Fee Funds in the amount of $75,000.00 providing the initial funding for the Seminola Boulevard/Cumberland Farms Remediation project.

25.  Approve and authorize the Chairman to execute appropriate Resolution #2008-R-155, as shown on page __________, implementing Budget Amendment Request (BAR) #08-73 through many funds in the amount of $845,831.00 in order to adjust the budgeted Information Technology Services Lease Cost Allocation amounts.

26.  Approve and authorize the Chairman to execute appropriate Resolution #2008-R-156, as shown on page __________, implementing Budget Amendment Request (BAR) #08-74 through the Water & Sewer Fund in the amount of $42,000.00 to fund an office space lease for CH2M Hill staff at Reflections.

27.  Approve and authorize the Chairman to execute the Budget Change Request (BCR) #08-28 through the Stormwater Fund in the amount of $30,000.00 to fund the NPDES Year 4 Permit Support and Permit Renewal project.

28.  Approve and authorize the Chairman to execute the Budget Change Request (BCR) #08-29 through the General Fund in the amount of $50,000.00 to establish the Seminole County Internet Web Site Redesign project.

 

Planning and Development

Development Review

30.  Approve and authorize the Chairman to execute the final plat for Clayton Crossing Townhomes Second Amendment, containing 146 townhome lots on a 13.18 acre parcel zoned PUD (Planned Unit Development), located on the north side of SR 426 (Aloma Avenue) and west side of SR 417, within Greenway Pointe PUD; in Section 31, Township 21 S, Range 31 E, (Taylor Morrison of Florida, Inc. and Clayton Crossing Townhomes Owners’ Association, Inc.).

31.  Approve and authorize the Chairman to execute the final plat for Terracina at Lake Forest First Amendment, containing 68 townhome lots on a 20.03 acre parcel zoned PUD (Planned Unit Development), located on the north side of SR 46 at the intersection of International Parkway, and approximately 1¼ mile west of I-4, in Section 30, Township 19 S, Range 30 E, (Taylor Morrison of Florida, Inc. and Terracina at Lake Forest Owners’ Association, Inc.).

32.  Authorize the release of the Rinehart Road Right-of-Way (ROW)-The Market Place Right-of-Way Utilization Permit Maintenance Bond #14032466 in the amount of $17,438.79 for the Rinehart Road ROW - The Market Place road improvements.

33.  Approve and authorize the Chairman to execute the final plat for Reserve at Alaqua Country Club Subdivision located on Alaqua Drive west of Markham Woods Road in Section 15, Township 20S, Range 29E (Steel Curtain of Central Florida, LLC and Alaqua Group, LLLP).

34.  Approve and authorize the Chairman to execute the final plat for Exchange at Savannah Park located on the west side of International Parkway between Wilson Road and Wayside Drive in Section 30, Township 19S, Range 30E (Savannah Meridian Acquisition Group, LLC).

Planning

35.  Authorize the Planning Department to schedule and advertise public hearings to consider the designation of seven parcels, owned by The Seminole County School Board, a Brownfield Area for purposes of environmental remediation. The property is generally located northwest of the intersection of S.R. 46 and Brisson Avenue.

 

Public Works

Engineering

36.  Adopt appropriate Resolution #2008-R-157, as shown on page ________, and authorize the Chairman to execute a Locally Funded Agreement Supplemental Amendment Number 2, as shown on page _________, with the Florida Department of Transportation; authorize the issuance of a check in the amount of $11,762,712.00 from funds in the County’s 2008/2009 Fiscal Year Budget to be paid to the Florida Department of Transportation by November 1, 2008.

37.  Adopt appropriate Resolution #2008-R-158, as shown on page _________, and authorize the Chairman to execute a Quitclaim Deed, as shown on page __________, conveying property (FDOT Parcel No. 118.5R) necessary to construct or improve State Road 434 to the Florida Department of Transportation.

38.  Adopt appropriate Resolution #2008-R-159, as shown on page _________, and authorize the Chairman to execute a Subordination of County Utility Interests Agreement, as shown on page _________, for FDOT Parcel Numbers 104.8R and 105.4R to the Florida Department of Transportation to construct or improve State Road 400 (Interstate 4).

Roads-Stormwater

39.  Approve and authorize the Chairman to sign the 2008/09 Detailed Work Plan Budget (DACS Form 13623), as shown on page ________, based on the tentatively approved budget, as part of establishing Seminole County Mosquito Control as a State Approved Mosquito Control Program.

 

     Districts 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 voted AYE.

-------

     Commissioner Dallari stated there have been a lot of issues relating to adopting the Resolution (Item #29) changing the name of Lake Drive and E. Lake Drive to Seminola Blvd.  He recommended splitting the name change (half to Seminola Blvd. and the other half to E. Lake Drive) and using the traffic light on Seminola as the dividing point.  Letters and e-mails in opposition and in support of the name change were received and filed.

     Maggie Ketchum, Building, addressed the Board to state that recommendation has not been before the E911 Committee.  Their next meeting is scheduled for July 9, 2008.

     Motion by Commissioner Dallari, seconded by Commissioner Van Der Weide to continue to the July 22, 2008 meeting request to adopt a Resolution (Item #29) changing the name of Lake Drive and E. Lake Drive to Seminola Blvd.

     Under discussion, Commissioner McLean stated as the other District Commissioner, he is comfortable with this direction.

     Districts 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 voted AYE.

COUNTY ATTORNEY’S CONSENT AGENDA

     Chairman Carey stated in April the Board approved “Commissioners Travel” by a 3-2 vote, and before they vote on Item #41, she would like to see if the Board would like to have further discussions.

     Commissioner Henley stated he believes the County Attorney has a different proposal. 

     Upon inquiry by Commissioner Henley, Chairman Carey advised the alternate proposal was the BCC would not be reimbursed for travel inside the County but be reimbursed for travel outside the County.  She stated she feels that would be more financially prudent at this time.

     Motion by Commissioner Dallari, seconded by Commissioner Henley to approve a proposed negotiated settlement relating to Parcel Numbers 136/736 on the County Road 15 road improvement project, Hakimian property.  The proposed negotiated settlement is at the total sum of $48,392.00 inclusive of all compensation to the owner, statutory attorney fees, expert costs, statutory interest, and any other matter for which Seminole County might be obligated to pay relating to these parcels.

     Districts 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 voted AYE.

- - -

     Commissioner Henley stated he shares everyone’s concerns with regard to the budget; however, the BCC’s travel budget is not a large item.  He said the County has not balanced the budget and there are a lot more cuts that need to be made.  He stated he would like to consider a motion to adopt the alternative to not reimburse the BCC for travel inside the County but to reimburse the BCC for travel outside the County.

     Mr. McMillan stated the Board needs to make a motion to reconsider the prior motion first.  The alternative is the Board would not authorize travel by private vehicle within Seminole County and the Commissioners would have the ability to use a County vehicle. 

            Motion by Commissioner Henley, seconded by Commissioner Dallari to reconsider the motion to establish a stipend for Commissioners’ travel.

     Districts 1, 3, 4 and 5 voted AYE.

     Commissioner McLean voted NAY.

     Chairman Carey recessed the meeting at 10:25 a.m. to allow the Board time to review the alternate policy.  The Chairman reconvened the meeting at 10:35 a.m.

     Chairman Carey advised the travel policy amendment that Mr. McMillan submitted was not accurate as he misunderstood what the direction was.  She stated the direction is the BCC would not be reimbursed for traveling inside the County and a County vehicle would be available, and the BCC would be reimbursed for travel outside the County when they are representing the Board on various boards and committees.  She stated this item would be continued to the afternoon session so that the County Attorney can prepare the correct policy language for consideration.

CONSTITUTIONAL OFFICERS’ CONSENT AGENDA

     Motion by Commissioner Dallari, seconded by Commissioner McLean to authorize and approve the following:

CLERK’S OFFICE

42.  Approval of Expenditure Approval Lists, as shown on page __________, dated May 27 & June 2, 2008; and Payroll Approval List, as shown on page __________, dated May 29, 2008; approval of Official Minutes dated May 20, 2008; approval of Board of County Commissioners Destruction List - 2008, as shown on page __________; and noting, for information only, the following Clerk's "Received and Filed".

 

 1.  Second Amendment, as shown on page _______, to RFP-0863-06, Serco, Inc.

 

 2.  Warranty Deed, as shown on page ________, dated May 8, 2008, granted by KBC Development, Inc., for the Office Warehouse Expansion/KBC Warehouses project.

 

 3.  Warranty Deed, as shown on page ________, dated May 5, 2008, granted by Delphini Industrial Park at Southern Cross, LLC, for the Beardall Avenue Right-of-Way/Delphini Industrial Park project.

 

 4.  Work Order #19, as shown on page ________, to PS-1501-06.

 

 5.  Second Amendment, as shown on page ________, to RFP-4232-04, Calvin, Giordano & Assoc.

 

 6.  Change Orders #2 and #3, as shown on page ________, to CC-2167-07.

 

 7.  Utility Agreement, as shown on page ________, for Sewer Service with Douglas Square LLC.

 

 8.  Letter of acceptance and Bill of Sale, as shown on page ________, for the Fifth Third Bank SR 46/International Parkway project.

 

 9.  Addendum #8, as shown on page _________, to The Springs PUD Commitment Agreement.

 

10.  Development Orders, as shown on page _________, as follows:  Emily H. Williams, et al, 1724 Roseberry Lane; Melissa Harbin, 334 Lakebreeze Cir.; Kenneth W. & Sheralee Faith, 5444 Ferrol Drive; Eduardo Pineiro, 102 Camden Road; Jeanie & Alan Brown, 1210 Glastonberry Road; Guy & Carol L. Everett, 1576 Hunters Stand Run; Robert T., Jr. & Gretchen B. Hays, 1554 Antoinette Ct.; Gordon N. & Lynn M. Browne, 119 Spring Valley Loop; Polly Wilson, 116 Sweetbriar Branch; Patricia Hackett, 1280 Cardinal Court; Florida Communications Partners LLC, 339 International Parkway; CSR LLC, 1157 West Highway 436; Kenneth & Georgette Guthrie, 3431 Australian Cir.; John K. & Kelly A. Smart, 122 Bayberry Road; Iris Villafranca, 2373 Oxer Ct.; Jeff & Jennifer Prechter, 125 Spring Cove Trail; Roy D. & Trudie O. Fluharty, 3633 Osceola Road; Jim Williams, E. Lake Mary Blvd. and Laura Ave. (vacant); Frank S. & Mary K. Tibbitts, 200 Echo Hollow Way; Mohamad S. & Karen Kazma, 363 Deer Pointe Cir.; William Gribben, 3123 Foxwood Drive; Eulalee Bryan-Henry, 962 Canary Lake Court; and Valerie & James Lettieri, 4947 Cains Wren Trail.

 

11.  Cash Maintenance Bond and Maintenance and Escrow Agreement, as shown on page _________, for the Monroe Commerce Center, Phase 3, in the amount of $1,086.80.

 

12.  Notice of hearing from the Public Service Commission regarding Docket No. 000475-TP, Complaint by Bellsouth Telecommunications, Inc. against Thrifty Call, Inc.

 

13.  First Amendment, as shown on page _________, to RFP-4269-06, Flowers Chemical Laboratories, Inc.

 

14.  Work Order #68, as shown on page _________, to CC-1220-03.

 

15.  Work Order #30, as shown on page _________, to PS-1074-06.

 

16.  Change Orders #1, as shown on page ________, to Work Orders #12 and #16 for CC-1075-06.

 

17.  Assignment of Term Contract IFB-600282-07, as shown on page ________, to The Brickman Group, LTD, LLC.

 

18.  Work Order #32, as shown on page ________, to PS-1529-06.

 

19.  Amendments #1, as shown on page ________, to Work Orders #46 and #56 for PS-5120-02.

 

20.  Second Amendment, as shown on page _________, to RFP-4233-04, Tindale-Oliver & Associates.

 

21.  Certificate of Completion, as shown on page _________, for Work Order #11 to CC-1075-06.

 

22.  Work Order #28, as shown on page _________, to PS-0381-06.

 

23.  Change Order #1, as shown on page _________, to Work Order #10 for CC-0012-05.

 

24.  First Amendment, as shown on page _________, to M-503-06, Exacom, Inc.

 

25.  Work Order #14, as shown on page _________, to RFP-0778-06.

 

26.  Litigation Consultant Services Agreement, as shown on page _________, with Lotspeich & Assoc.

 

27.  First Amendment, as shown on page __________, to Term Contract IFB-3122-05, Engineered Castings.

 

28.  PAY Counseling Agreement, RFP-600254-07, as shown on page __________, with Therapy 4 Kids and Families, Inc.

 

29.  Third Amendment, as shown on page __________, to Term Contract IFB-3121-05 with Control Technologies of Central Florida, Inc.

 

30.  Work Order #9, as shown on page _________, to CC-1284-06.

 

31.  Notice of Order from the Public Service Commission regarding Docket No. 080186-EI, Petition by Progress Energy Florida, Inc.

 

32.  Tennis Developmental Instructor Agreements, as shown on page _________, with John Sanders, Luke Bolanos, Garrett Dobson, Jerry Fekede, Daniel Colon, Gareth Ripley, and Brittany Dobson.

 

33.  Assistant and Associate Tennis Pro Agreement, as shown on page _________, with Robert Cronk.

 

34.  Cash Maintenance Bond and Maintenance and Escrow Agreement, as shown on page __________, for Boys Town Central Florida, Inc. in the amount of $7,235.37.

 

35.  Maintenance Bond, as shown on page __________, for Rinehart Road ROW-Seminole Commons in the amount of $11,259.39.

 

36.  Work Orders #24 and #25, as shown on page __________, to CC-1075-06.

 

37.  Certification of Completion, as shown on page __________, for CC-2583-07.

 

38.  Notice of hearing and prehearing from the Public Service Commission regarding Dockets Nos. 080203-EI, 080245-EI, and 080246-EI, Florida Power & Light Co.

 

39.  Work Order #33, as shown on page _________, to PS-1529-06.

 

40.  Amendment #1, as shown on page _________, to Work Order #1 for PS-2144-07.

 

41.  Work Order #36, as shown on page _________, to PS-5174-04.

 

42.  Memorandum to the BCC from Sheriff Donald F. Eslinger regarding the FY 2008/09 budget request for the John E. Polk Correctional Facility expansion and submitting the Sheriff’s FY 2008/09 Proposed Budget, as shown on page _______.

 

43.  Termination Letter, as shown on page ___________, for M-3094-08 Yankee Lake Surface WTP-SJRWMD CUP Assistance.

 

44.  Amendment #1, as shown on page _________, to Work Order #8 for PS-1020-06.

 

45.  Change Order #1, as shown on page __________, to CC-2424-07.

 

46.  Amendments #1, as shown on page _________, to Work Orders #3 and #4 for PS-5140-03.

 

47.  Amendments #1, as shown on page _________, to Work Orders #78 and #83 for PS-5165-04.

 

48.  Copy of e-mail from Julia Thompson to Joe Forte regarding designating the Acting Leisure Services Director effective May 24, 2008, and copy of e-mail from Joe Forte to Julia Thompson authorizing Bryan Nipe as Acting Leisure Services Director.

 

49.  Term Contract IFB-600404-08, as shown on page _________, with Sun Belt Medical/Emergi-Source.

 

50.  Work Order #34, as shown on page __________, to PS-1529-06.

 

51.  Third Amendment, as shown on page __________, to RFP-600244-07, Executive Source, Inc. d/b/a ESQ IT Solutions.

 

52.  Work Order #4, as shown on page _________, to PS-5189-05.

 

Sheriff’s Office

43.  Approve and authorize the Chairman to execute appropriate Resolution #2008-R-161, as shown on page ___________, implementing Budget Amendment (BAR) #08-79 in the General Fund for the amount of $24,986.00 to increase funding for the Sheriff's Office. 

44.  Approve and authorize the Chairman to execute appropriate Resolution #2008-R-162, as shown on page __________, implementing Budget Amendment Resolution (BAR) #08-80 in the General Fund for the amount of $830,778.00 to increase funding for Child Protective Services.

 

     Districts 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 voted AYE.

REGULAR AGENDA

     Austin Watkins, Planning, addressed the Board to present request to approve the Final Master Plan and Developer’s Commitment Agreement for the Eden Point PUD, consisting of 26.78± acres, located on the west side of Dodd Road and north of Howell Branch Road, Ralph Spano.  He stated the Eden Point PUD was approved on January 8, 2008 for a maximum of 39 detached single-family dwelling lots.  The Preliminary Master Plan allows for 11 lake access lots with a minimum lot size of 11,900 sq. ft. and an additional 28 lots with a minimum lot size of 6,900 sq. ft.  Staff finds that the proposed request complies with all conditions of the development order, Land Development Code and Preliminary Master Plan.  Staff recommends approval of the request based on staff findings.

     Motion by Commissioner Dallari, seconded by Commissioner McLean to approve the Final Master Plan and Developer’s Commitment Agreement, as shown on page _________, for the Eden Point PUD, consisting of 26.78± acres, located on the west side of Dodd Road and north of Howell Branch Road, Ralph Spano, based on staff findings.

     Under discussion, Commissioner Dallari stated he appreciates the applicant dedicating Tract 1 as open space and it not being part of the open space requirement.

     Districts 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 voted AYE.

-------

     Dori DeBord, Planning & Development Director, presented a request, continued from the March 25, 2008 meeting, which was to determine the Findings of Necessity for the Oviedo CRA documentation.  Staff has determined that the Land Use requirements of the current report have been met, and the Findings of Necessity meet the Florida Statute requirements to create a CRA district.  Letters and e-mails supporting the CRA request; a copy of the Oviedo CRA Findings of Necessity and Redevelopment Strategy; and information of What is a CRA, How a CRA is created, How a CRA works and Why Should Seminole County Partner with Oviedo, and How will Seminole County and Oviedo benefit from the proposed CRA were received and filed.

     Ms. Coto advised she has been working with the previous City Manager and the present Interim City Manager in which the Florida Statute requires that they take action by June 30, 2008.  The Florida Statute under Community Redevelopment Agencies was changed two Legislative sessions ago in which the County must approve or deny, by mutual consent, a timeline contained within the statute, or it has to be mutually consented to a different timeline by the city or county.  She stated part of the concerns she expressed to the City is based upon the County’s present fiscal picture that was discussed during the May 1st meeting.  In about three years from the County’s present financial forecast they will deplete their reserves and they do not have a game plan as to how they will continue to operate.  The current revenues continue to decline and there has been a 6.5% drop in the overall property tax base.  She stated her financial forecasting globe is fairly cloudy.  She added if the Board wanted to take action other than approval or denial of the request, staff would like direction as to what alternative the Board would be looking at and staff would have to present that to the city to see whether or not they agree with that alternative.

     Upon inquiry by Commissioner Henley, Ms. Coto advised the five-year financial forecast for FY 2012 shows they will have depleted all reserves based upon the County’s spending pattern and they would not have a balanced budget.

     Commissioner Henley stated he feels the report is a good one; but based upon the track record with other CRAs, it takes seven years before they can come up with any revenue at all.  He said in spite of what has occurred in Altamonte Springs and in some of the other areas where there have been development, they still are not bringing in massive amounts of money.  He further said he doesn’t see, under the circumstances now, how the County can participate financially.  He added that he doesn’t have a problem with the City setting up a CRA but without the County financing at this time. 

     Chairman Carey stated she also is not opposed to the City establishing a CRA, but it is irresponsible for her to vote to fund and help support the CRA.

     Commissioner McLean stated he doesn’t think anyone on the Board doesn’t think that the CRA makes sense and the area needs redevelopment.  Perhaps the solution is to delay the implementation of this program for 12 months as that will give them time for the economy to move into a forward position and that will give them an opportunity to work through the challenges.  They still don’t have the fiscal component to be able to build a true, solid redevelopment agreement.  He asked if the city of Oviedo is comfortable establishing a CRA without County funding.  He added the County is not in a fiscal position to make a long-term 25-year commitment. 

     Chairman Carey stated the city of Oviedo wanted to be able to move forward in getting the tax base established by 2008 and by the County delaying this, it would prevent the City from doing that.  If the Board agrees to support the CRA and let the City move forward without the County’s funding, the County can come back in the future and discuss becoming a financial partner.

     Commissioner Van Der Weide stated he feels the County owes it to the city of Oviedo to establish a CRA but he doesn’t see how they can offer any funding. 

     Commissioner Dallari said he believes the City and their Mayor have been working on this since the early 90’s; and since then, they have been trying to put together a plan of how to move the city forward.  Through those years, they have put together a plan and brought the community together.  The City also has put $9 million of infrastructure cost into that plan and that was approved by the voters in 2002.  The CRA would be the center point of bringing old downtown into a new downtown.  He added he feels it is important to establish a CRA by the end of this month. 

     Ms. Coto explained the reason why the June 30 date was important to the City.

     Commissioner Dallari stated he would like to see the CRA approved with no financial participation from the County, with the County working with the city in developing a redevelopment plan.

     Ms. Coto and Mr. McMillan explained for Commissioner Henley how other CRAs were established without County funding.

     Mayor Mary Lou Andrews, city of Oviedo, addressed the Board to state she is here today hoping that the County will approve the delegation authority.  She said the one thing that makes their CRA so unique is it is the blueprint for success because it combines Broadstreet Partners and Oviedo in the Park.  The City is trying to do this as a partnership between private and public and the voters have given them the $9 million for that area.  There is a lot of broad interest and support from the community for this initiative.  She stated she hopes the Board would consider the fact that the private enterprise is going to make a lot of this happen for them.

     Gene Miller, Oviedo Interim City Manager, addressed the Board to advise as it stands before the Board, the resolution is asking participation until October 1, 2010.  The third year, based upon estimates of development of Oviedo in the Park, would stand at about $40,000.  Assuming that the economy turns somewhat, the County’s contribution would be about $220,000 during the fourth year.  He stated assuming this is successful, 50% would go toward the County’s General Fund and 50% would go to the City’s General Fund.   He said he feels they have a conservative proposal and whatever the BCC does, they respectively appreciate it.

     Chairman Carey stated she feels the majority of the Board supports the Resolution delegating the authority of Oviedo creating a CRA but without the County’s funding participation.

     Mr. McMillan advised he has a draft resolution based on the one they did for the city of Casselberry and it doesn’t deal with any limitation on the length of the CRA.

     Chairman Carey stated she would recommend moving forward with establishing the CRA without financial support from the County.

     Commissioner Van Der Weide said he has no problem with a 20-year timeframe.

     Upon inquiry by Chairman Carey, Mr. McMillan advised the Board needs to decide whether to grant or deny Oviedo’s request.  If the Board wants the City to proceed by July 1, they will have to develop an alternative delegation in lieu of what they have asked for; and someone has to make those decisions.  The Statute authorizes creating the CRA for up to 30 years and if the Board wants the delegation to provide less time than that, then they will have to tell them.

     Upon further inquiry by Chairman Carey, Mr. McMillan advised the Board has to act on this by June 30 or have a mutual agreement to extend it.  The City has refused to extend the June 30 deadline because they want the base year as of June 30.   The Board’s deadline is created by the agreement with the City and if the City does not extend the date the resolution is automatically approved. 

     Chairman Carey stated she is proposing that the Board take action on this item and have both attorneys get together after this meeting and bring it back this afternoon.

     Motion by Commissioner Dallari, seconded by Commissioner Van Der Weide to deny the Findings of Necessity to establish the Oviedo CRA.

     Districts 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 voted AYE.

     Commissioner Van Der Weide directed the County Attorney to come back this afternoon with a subsequent resolution for Findings of Necessity in approving the city of Oviedo’s CRA with zero funding from the County and a 20-year timeframe.

     Mr. McMillan stated this will give the city of Oviedo a right to create a CRA for 20 years. 

-------

     Austin Watkins, Planning, presented request for a five-year extension for the SR 426 & Chapman Road (Walgreens) PCD Final Site Plan, for approximately 5.12 acres, located on the southwest corner of the intersection of SR 426 and Chapman Road, Panayes Dikeou.  The original PCD was approved in 1998 and allowed those uses which are permitted in the M-1A district.  Staff recommends approval of the request.

     Motion by Commissioner Dallari, seconded by Commissioner McLean to approve a five year extension for the SR 426 & Chapman Road (Walgreens) PCD Final Site Plan, for approximately 5.12 acres, located on the southwest corner of the intersection of SR 426 and Chapman Road, Panayes Dikeou.  

     Districts 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 voted AYE.

-------

     Ms. Coto presented request to approve an Interlocal Agreement consolidating Winter Springs and Seminole County Fire and Emergency Medical Services under the authority of Seminole County.  She stated this was discussed about a month ago and staff entered into negotiations with the city of Winter Springs for potentially consolidating the fire departments.  She commended Mr. Tad Stone and Mr. Forte for their work in addressing some of the concerns.  She stated staff is recommending that the Board proceed forward with the request.

     Mayor John Bush, City of Winter Springs, addressed the Board to state he would like to discuss two items of concern.  He said the first issue is they would like to extend the pension election date to September 1, 2008 as this will give the firefighters time to determine whether to go with the State retirement or stay with City retirement.  The other thing is they would like to have the County and City staff work together to come up with a signage concept on vehicles that would be mutually acceptable.  The City of Winter Springs Commission approved the interlocal agreement at their meeting last night (3-1) and they are pleased that this has worked out.  Memorandum from Mayor Bush regarding consolidation was received and filed.

     Chairman Carey stated part of the discussions they have had is what the financial impact will be and it is probably a break even for them to take over the fire department.   This was done with Altamonte Springs in the past and there is no difference between the equipment.  She further stated she has no problem extending the date to September 1st because if the firefighters do not want to go with the FRS retirement system by that date they don’t get to change their minds in the future.  She said Mr. Stone has assured her that any liability issues have been met with the buildings and equipment they would be assuming.

     Motion by Commissioner McLean, seconded by Commissioner Dallari to approve and authorize the Chairman to execute an Interlocal Agreement, as shown on page ________, consolidating Winter Springs and Seminole County Fire and Emergency Medical Services under the authority of Seminole County, including extending the pension election date to September 1, 2008.

     Under discussion, Mr. Stone stated he would like to reflect the following changes:  Striking the word “either” at the end of the first line in Section 3.5.3, and striking the word “include” and inserting the word “including” in Attachments D and E (lease agreements). 

     Commissioner McLean said he will amend his motion to include those changes.  Commissioner Dallari concurred.

     Districts 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 voted AYE.

     Mr. Bush stated he would like to ask the County’s public relations person to work with the City Manager in drafting something to inform the citizens.

CHAIRMAN’S REPORT

     Chairman Carey advised the County has received a grant in the amount of $185,000 from the Florida Department of Health.

-------

     Chairman Carey informed the Board of a memo submitted by Assistant County Attorney, Ann Colby, relative to eliminating one BCC member from the VAB.  She recommended removing Commissioner Van Der Weide from this committee.

     Motion by Commissioner Dallari, seconded by Commissioner McLean to authorize eliminating Commissioner Van Der Weide from the VAB.

     Districts 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 voted AYE.

     Chairman Carey stated the Board needs to appoint one residential member before September 1st.  She stated she doesn’t have a name at this time but if any Commissioner has a name in mind, they can have that person submit an application so they can be appointed in July or August.

-------

     Chairman Carey stated there was discussion at the last Congress of Regional Leaders meeting regarding funding of MyRegion.  The Board committed $35,000 a year three years ago.  During those discussions everyone knew that they were going to be facing some cutbacks in the coming years’ budgets.  She stated she received a letter from Frank Bruno, Chairman of MyRegion and Congress of Regional Leaders, requesting a three year funding commitment for $30,000 for the next three years.  She said Fiscal Services Director Lisa Spriggs indicated that this is not in the 2009 budget.  However, the County has a lot of time invested in MyRegion and she feels it is important that they continue to support their efforts.

     Ms. Coto agreed the County has invested a lot of time in MyRegion.  She stated these funds are not in the budget and staff is still looking for money to balance the budget.

     Motion by Commissioner Henley, seconded by Commissioner McLean to authorize expenditure in the amount of $30,000 for the next three years for MyRegion.

     Districts 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 voted AYE.

-------

     Chairman Carey stated the Congress of Regional Leaders re-enlisted Orange County Commissioner Bill Segal to be the champion on the regional water strategy.  She said the reason he was appointed is he is a former board member of the South Florida Water Management District.  Since Mr. Segal has extensive knowledge on the Water Management Board, the Congress of Regional Leaders felt he would be a good one to lead them in the regional water discussions.  She stated she feels it is important for them to set up a meeting with Mr. Segal and his staff, herself, Ms. Coto, and John Cirello to talk about how they are going to get this message out. 

-------

     Chairman Carey stated the Private Business Association of Seminole was very instrumental in taking the private lead of raising money in order to get the message out on the importance of the infrastructure sales tax.  She stated Dr. Vogel, Seminole County School Board, was asked to attend the Issues Committee meeting and he shared some of the concerns that the Committee had.  One item that is going to be on the ballot is Amendment V and that is an item that would eliminate the millage that the School Board currently levies and replace it with a penny sales tax.  Even using the numbers the tax watch group has established for it, that is a $46 million loss in revenue to the School Board.  Mr. Vogel is very concerned about this and they do not have any idea how they are going to function if they have to take that kind of hit.  The other concerns they have is the County’s infrastructure sales tax which they currently share with the School Board as it sunsets in 2011.  The other thing that occurred this year is the community college having the ability to levy a penny to support community colleges.  She stated the Board needs to take up the issue of the infrastructure sales tax.  She further stated she feels that if there is not a lot of communication, this will come together at one time and she doesn’t think the voters are going to support an additional two cents on top of renewing the first one cent.  Therefore, she believes the Board needs to be very careful how they move forward as well as think about when and how they will go to the voters to renew the infrastructure sales tax and not get caught in the crossfire.  She advised the School Board also has the option to levy a one mill special tax.  With a $46 million shortfall and even with the one cent on Amendment V, it is going to be critical with new taxes being on the ballot and it can end up with everyone getting nothing.  She suggested the County may want to put together a committee.  She stated she informed Mr. Vogel that the Florida Association of School Boards and lobbyists for the education group need to get together to run a statewide campaign to educate the voters on what the implication for Amendment V will be.

-------

     Chairman Carey reported that the city of Altamonte Springs will be holding Red Hot and Boom on Thursday, July 3 at Cranes Roost Park from 4:00 p.m. to 11:00 p.m.  The city of Geneva will be holding a parade bright and early on July 4 and this year’s theme is “Living Our Rural Heritage”.  The city of Oviedo will be having an Independence Day celebration from 11:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m., a block party from 5:00 p.m. to 9:15 p.m. at the Aquatic center and fire works starting at 9:15 p.m.  There will be a charge for the event and anyone wanting to buy a wrist band can do so for $7.00 for all day and $4.00 for the evening event.  She added that the city of Sanford will have their traditional Fourth of July celebration from 5:00 p.m. to 10:30 p.m.  She stated she believes the city of Winter Springs has cancelled their celebration; however, she will check into that and get back with the Board.  She wished everyone a happy Fourth of July.

COMMUNICATIONS AND/OR REPORTS

     The following Communications and/or Reports were received and filed:

 1.  Letter dated May 30, 2008 from Ana Viamonte Ros, State Surgeon General, Florida Department of Health, to Chairman Brenda Carey re:  award of Emergency Medical Services matching grant number M8070.

 

 2.  Copy of letter dated June 4, 2008 from James McAdams, Director, Property Tax Oversight, Florida Department of Revenue, to David Johnson, Seminole County Property Appraiser, re:  House Bill 5061 requiring Property Appraisers in counties with a population greater than 25,000 to pay for aerial photographs once every three years.

 

 3.  Letter dated June 5, 2008 from Frank Bruno, Chair, Congress of Regional Leaders, to Chairman Brenda Carey re:  Foundation for Building Community, Inc.

 

 4.  Memorandum dated June 6, 2008 from Ann Colby, Assistant County Attorney, to the Board of County Commissioners re:  Legislative Changes affecting the Value Adjustment Board.

 

 5.  Facsimile dated June 9, 2008 from Catherine Weil, Albertson’s LLC, to Chairman Brenda Carey re:  the Sale/Permanent Closing of Certain Florida Albertson’s Locations.

 

 6.  Memorandum dated June 9, 2008 from Seminole County Historical Commission, Don Epps, to Seminole County Board of County Commissioners, re:  Accomplishments at Museum of Seminole County History.

 

 7.  Letter dated June 10, 2008 from Greg Pryor, Chairman, Red Bug Residential Coalition, to Chairman Brenda Carey re:  C.A. Stone Small Scale Land Use Amendment East and West – File #Z2007-51 and File #Z2007-50.

 

 8.  Copy of letter dated June 10, 2008 from Commissioner Bill Segal, Orange County, to Frank Bruno, Congress of Regional Leaders, re:  promotion of a regional water agenda.

 

 9.  Letter dated June 10, 2008 from Robert White, President, Loch Arbor Homeowners Association, to Chairman Brenda Carey re:  County Road 46A wall, from West of Forrest Drive to East of Vinewood Drive.

 

10.  Copy of letter dated June 10, 2008 from Dr. Neil Euliano, President, Southern Technical College, to Joseph Bell, Enterprise, Florida, re:  Brownfield incentives and lack of government cooperation with the private sector.

 

11.  Letter dated June 10, 2008 from Bernard Mitchell, Martin Luther King, Jr. Steering Committee, to Chairman Brenda Carey re:  “Thank you” for naming of Martin Luther King, Jr. Boulevard.

 

12.  Copy of letter dated June 12, 2008 from Walter W. Stephens to Commissioner Bob Dallari re:  petition and letters opposing the renaming of East Lake Drive.

 

13.  Letter dated June 12, 2008 from Clayton Wilder, Administrator, FDLE, to Chairman Brenda Carey re:  Federal Fiscal Year 2008 Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant Program – JAG Countywide.

 

14.  Notice dated June 13, 2008 from the city of Oviedo re:  notice of consideration of adopting Resolution No. 1836-08, creation of a Community Redevelopment Area and creation of a Community Redevelopment Agency.

 

15.  Copy of letter dated June 13, 2008 from Edward L. Wilson, Jr., Program Administrator, Grants Unit of the Florida Department of Health, to Chief Leanna Raw re:  grant award.

 

16.  Copy of letter dated June 16, 2008 from Chairman Brenda Carey to Ana Viamonte Ros, State Surgeon General, Florida Department of Health, re:  recommendation of Fred Brummer to the RRAC and TRAP.

 

17.  Copy of Letter dated June 16, 2008 from Chairman Brenda Carey to James Bryan, III re:  recognition of his donation of property to the Seminole County Natural Lands Program.

 

18.  Copy of letter dated June 18, 2008 from Jerry McCollum, County Engineer, to Bob White, President, Loch Arbor Homeowners Association, re:  CR 46A – west of Forrest Drive to east of Vinewood Drive surplus property/wall.

 

19.  Letter dated June 19, 2008 from Brian Sackett, Mayor, city of Longwood, to Chairman Brenda Carey re:  proposed Timacuan Way rezoning.

 

20.  Various Contracts for services, as shown on page _______, with the Seminole County Parks and Recreation Division for the following:  Torrance Williams, Steve DeCresie, and Dennis Fenty.

 

DISTRICT COMMISSIONER’S REPORT

     Commissioner Henley stated he has asked staff to get with the owner of Sun State Trees on SR 434.  He said the Board approved the zoning for that operation and there were a number of restrictions placed on it and very few of them have been met.  He stated staff has met with them and reviewed all of the requirements placed on them and has given them time to clean it up.  He added that he feels they will cooperate in getting this done.

-------

     Commissioner Henley stated at the last meeting he informed the Board about the efforts that are underway regarding commuter rail.  He said at that time some information from Congressman John Mica’s analysis was done nationwide regarding liability insurance.  He stated he will provide a package to the Board regarding facts on this in case they will have to address it.  He added he also has asked Harry Barley, Executive Director of MPO, to begin making contacts to see if they can put together an Urban Transportation Coalition.  He said Mr. Barley has already met with the Chairman and Mayor of the MPO in Jacksonville as well as the Executive Director of MPO, District DOT and Jacksonville Transportation Authority and they are all on board.  He has had contacts in the Tampa area and they have been well received and it appears they also will be on board with the County.  They are attempting to set up meetings with Pinellas County, Sarasota, Broward and Dade counties.  Everyone has been on board trying to come up with all the requests for sales taxes.  The MPO and the region as a whole have been seeking a dedicated funding source for transportation and it is going to be vital to future boards that they have that in place by 2017.  He said he doesn’t feel that the one cent sales tax is going to cover the School Board if the property tax is eliminated.  He added he has a meeting with Dr. Vogel to further discuss some of the issues, but he doesn’t see how they can afford to sit back and not keep the people informed of the impact on the services the County has been able to render to the people.  In his opinion, they need to recognize where the responsibility lies and it is not a local sales tax for the community college.  If they don’t get a dedicated funding source, transportation is going to come to a halt.  He feels it is critical that the County become prepared to educate the public regarding these conflicting issues that are cropping up. 

     Upon inquiry by Commissioner Van Der Weide, Commissioner Henley advised the Metro Board Executive Committee met and they have a group starting to look at how they can communicate and what to communicate.

-------

     Commissioner McLean stated he attended the Seminole County Regional Chamber Chase awards last week and a “Success in Seminole” proclamation was presented to Brindley Pieters.  The Community Champion award was presented to Community Based Seminole.  The Public Servant award was presented to Mayor John Bush, and the Public Leader of the Year was awarded to Frank Iapolo (phonetic). 

-------

     Commissioner McLean stated he had the pleasure of speaking before the Winter Springs Chamber of Commerce and they discussed SeminoleWay.  He said as they move into the second phase, it is more important get more communities involved.  He stated he would like to thank staff for their PowerPoint Presentation as it was well received. 

-------

     Commissioner McLean advised the Citizens Committee met with regard to the Lake Mary pool and there were a number of issues discussed.  He stated the School Board took this issue off their May 27 meeting and one issue that was discussed was they were unsure of the $240,000 expenditure that they had committed to via a contract for the restrooms and a classroom area at the aquatic center.  They have discovered that the dollars are there so that is a positive.  They had some concerns that there could be some crossover runs and, because of their fiscal situation, there was a lot of discussion about the design-build aspect.  He stated the one area that needs more work is the operational cost on a reoccurring basis and they are talking about ways to be able to deal with that.  The Committee is looking towards getting that done and they are moving forward to bring this back to the School Board on July 29.  The committee is working on getting the parties together again to see whether they can cover that last challenge.

     Chairman Carey advised the ongoing maintenance and operation is the responsibility of the School Board and it might be prudent for everyone to wait and see how the November vote turns out.

-------

     Commissioner McLean advised he will be leaving tomorrow to attend the Florida Association of Counties annual conference.  He stated he has been asked by Chairman Carey to secure the District 22 board seat.  He asked for approval for travel expenses to and from Miami for said conference. 

     Motion by Commissioner Dallari, seconded by Commissioner Van Der Weide to authorize travel expenses for Commissioner McLean to travel to and from Miami for the Florida Association of Counties Conference.

     Districts 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 voted AYE.

-------

     Commissioner Dallari stated at the last Board meeting Commissioner McLean requested approval to send a letter to the Attorney General asking for a legal opinion as requested by Chief Judge Simmons; and he would like to bring it back up for reconsideration.

     Chairman Carey advised she and the County Manager have a meeting scheduled next week with the Chief Judge to discuss a way to resolve this issue.

     Motion by Commissioner Dallari, seconded by Commissioner McLean to reconsider the motion made at the June 10, 2008 meeting to send a letter to the Attorney General asking for a legal opinion on the requirement to fund the General Magistrate position.

     Districts 1, 2 and 3 voted AYE.

     Commissioners Carey and Henley voted NAY.

     Motion by Commissioner Dallari, seconded by Commissioner McLean to authorize sending a letter to the Attorney General asking for a legal opinion with regard to the County’s responsibility of funding the General Master.

     Under discussion, Mr. McMillan stated since the last meeting, he has looked into whether they can fund the Juvenile Coordinator position.  He stated even if they took that out of the budget and fund it somewhere else, they are still spending all of the innovation fees on other things and it wouldn’t free up any money the Judge wants.  That is why they are meeting with the Judge to see whether it is eligible for funding.

     Chairman Carey stated they are currently spending the innovation fees on the position they have to fund and on the Guardian Ad Litem program.  She said she feels it is prudent to have the meeting to see what the Judge is proposing before they seek the Attorney General’s opinion.

     Commissioner Henley stated he will not be supporting the motion as he feels it will be a waste of the Attorney General’s time as well as the County’s.  He further stated it does not change the resources they have to deal with, and there are many more important items to spend that money on.  He added he feels it is ridiculous to waste the Attorney General’s time on something that is not binding and it doesn’t solve the problem.

     Commissioner McLean said a third-party, nonbinding decision does not commit them at all but would give them more information to make a better and informed decision.

     Commissioner Van Der Weide agreed that it is a nonbinding decision.

     Chairman Carey stated there is no point of having a meeting with the Judge if the motion passes.  She stated she will not be supporting the motion as she feels they could come up with a resolution without asking for the Attorney General’s opinion.

     Districts 1, 2 and 3 voted AYE.

     Commissioners Carey and Henley voted NAY.

     Chairman Carey requested that Ms. Coto contact Judge Simmons to cancel the meeting scheduled for next week.

PUBLIC HEARINGS

     Ms. Coto advised staff has received an e-mail from the applicant of Item #48, BOA Appeal, William Gribben, requesting that this item be withdrawn.  She stated staff is presently contacting as many neighbors as possible about the applicant’s request.

-------

     Chairman Carey reminded the Board of a meeting upstairs with the Risk Management Committee.

-------

     The Chairman recessed the meeting at 12:05 p.m., reconvening at 1:30 p.m., with all Commissioners and all other Officials, with the exception of Deputy Clerk Eva Roach, who was replaced by Deputy Clerk Carylon Cohen, who were present at the Opening Session.

-------

     Chairman Carey announced that the city of Winter Springs’ 4th of July events have been cancelled.

PROOFS OF PUBLICATION

     Motion by Commissioner Dallari, seconded by Commissioner McLean, to authorize filing the proofs of publication for this meeting’s scheduled public hearings into the Record.

     Districts 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 voted AYE.

PUBLIC HEARINGS

APPEAL BOA/WILLIAM

GRIBBEN, Continued

 

     Continuation of a public hearing to consider the appeal of the Board of Adjustment’s decision to deny a rear yard setback variance from 30 feet to 15 feet for an addition in the Planned Unit Development District, 3123 Foxwood Drive; as described in the proof of publication, William Gribben.

     Chairman Carey advised this hearing was continued from the June 10, 2008 meeting.  She understands that now the staff has received a request to withdraw this item.

     Kathy Fall, Principal Planner, addressed the Board to state staff received an e-mail (not received and filed) from the applicant late this morning indicating he wishes to withdraw his application and request.

     No one spoke in support or in opposition to the withdrawal request.

     Motion by Commissioner Van Der Weide, seconded by Commissioner McLean, to accept withdrawal, per the applicant’s request, of the appeal of the Board of Adjustment’s decision to deny a rear yard setback variance from 30 feet to 15 feet for an addition in the Planned Unit Development District, 3123 Foxwood Drive; as described in the proof of publication, William Gribben.

     Districts 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 voted AYE.

HAWTHORNE GLEN PUD MAJOR

AMENDMENT/JACK REYNOLDS

 

     Proof of publication, as shown on page _______, calling for a public hearing to consider approval of the Hawthorne Glen PUD Major Amendment, approval of Addendum #2 to Development Order #03-2050005, approval of Addendum #2 to the Hawthorne Glen PUD Developer’s Commitment Agreement, enacting Ordinance rezoning from PUD to PUD, and approval of the revised Final Master Plan, for 1.46+/- acres located on the northwest corner of the intersection of Old Lockwood Road and McCulloch Road; Jack Reynolds, received and filed.

     Ian Sikonia, Senior Planner, addressed the Board to present the request, stating staff feels this PUD Major Amendment is consistent and compatible with the trend of development for the area and will help provide for a more compatible mixture of uses for the surrounding residents.  He advised the Planning and Zoning Commission (P&Z) met on May 7, 2008 and voted 6 to 1 to recommend approval of the Major Amendment, addendums, rezoning, and Final Master Plan as requested by the applicant.  The staff also recommends approval of the requests as identified.

     Chairman Carey said she noticed from the aerial that the development has changed since the last time the Board saw this.  She said the right-in, right-out on Old Lockwood Road probably makes a lot more sense, so that the people who are building can get in and out without having to go all the way around.

     Upon inquiry by Commissioner Dallari, Mr. Sikonia displayed on the site plan and explained what the existing buffers are and what the applicant is trying to reduce to.

     Attorney Jim Hattaway, representing the applicant, 840 Waterway Place, addressed the Board to state they are in agreement with the staff report.  He said they met with the leadership of the adjacent neighborhood homeowners association and they told them they have no objections to their application.

     Commissioner Dallari asked Attorney Hattaway how does the right-in, right-out play with the traffic circulation, and if he had done any traffic analysis on that. 

     Attorney Hattaway stated they did a traffic report and it was submitted to staff.  It was the conclusion of their traffic engineer that the right-in, right-out is beneficial, it works and there is no harm indicated.

     No one spoke in support or in opposition.

     Motion by Commissioner Dallari, seconded by Commissioner McLean, to approve the requested Hawthorne Glen PUD Major Amendment; approval of Addendum #2, as shown on page _______, to Development Order #03-2050005; approval of Addendum #2, as shown on page _______, to the Hawthorne Glen PUD Developer’s Commitment Agreement; enacting Ordinance #2008-31, as shown on page _______, approving rezoning from PUD to PUD, and approval of the revised Final Master Plan, for 1.46+/- acres located on the northwest corner of the intersection of Old Lockwood Road and McCulloch Road; as described in the proof of publication, Jack Reynolds, based on staff findings; and authorize the Chairman to execute the documents.

     Under discussion, Commissioner Dallari stated he would like to add one condition.  He asked if it was prudent to make the painted divider for the right-in, right-out semi-raised so that people cannot make the left turn, or would that be a hazard.

     Attorney Hattaway stated they would have no problem with doing that.

     Commissioner Dallari added that condition to his motion, and Commissioner McLean agreed to the amendment to the motion.

     Chairman Carey clarified that the amendment is for the diamond on the right turn to be raised concrete rather than painted.

     Districts 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 voted AYE.

C.A. STONE WEST SMALL SCALE

FUTURE LAND USE AMENDMENT AND

REZONE/CPH ENGINEERS

 

     Proof of publication, as shown on page _______, calling for a public hearing to consider enacting an Ordinance approving a Small Scale Future Land Use Amendment from LDR (Low Density Residential) to PD (Planned Development); enacting an Ordinance rezoning from A-1 (Agriculture) to PUD (Planned Unit Development); and approval of the Preliminary Master Plan and Development Order for 1.55+/- acres located on the south side of Red Bug Lake Road, approximately 250 feet west of Red Bug Lake Road and Slavia Road; CPH Engineers, received and filed.

     Austin Watkins, Senior Planner, addressed the Board to present the request, stating staff finds that the requested PUD Future Land Use designation and PUD zoning classification will allow for a transition between surrounding future land use designations and zoning classifications and are consistent with the trend of development in the area.  The P&Z Commission met on May 7, 2008 and voted 7 to 1 to recommend approval to LDR and PUD zoning with the condition that the applicant meet with the Red Bug Residential Coalition prior to the BCC meeting for the rezone and Small Scale Future Land Use Amendment for the subject property.  He advised a letter (copy received and filed) was previously distributed from the Red Bug Coalition with their position on this matter.  Staff is recommending approval of the amendment to PD and rezoning to PUD.

     Javier Omana, CPH Engineers, on behalf of C.A. Stone, addressed the Board to state he is happy to report a representative from the Red Bug Coalition is in attendance today with a letter endorsing the project.

     Chairman Carey advised that all the Commissioners received the letter from the Coalition as well.

     Mr. Omana stated they concur with the staff recommendation.

     Tom Boyko, 1451 Thornhill Circle, representing the Red Bug Residential Coalition, addressed the Board to state the Red Bug Coalition supports this application before the Board.  He said they have met numerous times with Mr. Stone and Mr. Omana and the final outcome was that they arrived at a unified decision.  The Red Bug Coalition sent letters to each Commissioner with their decision.  He highlighted that the office building proposed for this site is to be no greater than three occupied stories and a maximum 45-foot building height to the top ridge of the roof to allow for architectural enhancements and that this agreement is to be placed into the Development Order with the architectural drawing of the above-mentioned building; and included in the D.O. for pitched roofs on all four sides of the building.  Also, noted in the letter is the idea of cross access for the Novidomskis property.  He said they are encouraging that the County, Mr. Stone and Mr. Novidomskis establish such a cross access.

     No one else spoke in support or in opposition.

     Speaker Request Form for Mr. Boyko was received and filed.

     District Commissioner Dallari asked Mr. Omana if the applicant is indicating by the elevation in the agenda packet that he would be building this type of building.  Mr. Omana said yes; he is also agreeing to three stories with a maximum of 45 feet.

     Motion by Commissioner Dallari, seconded by Commissioner Van Der Weide, to enact Ordinance #2008-32, as shown on page _______, for a Small Scale Future Land Use Amendment from LDR (Low Density Residential) to PD (Planned Development); enact Ordinance #2008-33, as shown on page _______, rezoning from A-1 (Agriculture) to PUD (Planned Unit Development); and approval of the Preliminary Master Plan and Development Order, as shown on page _______, for 1.55+/- acres located on the south side of Red Bug Lake Road, approximately 250 feet west of Red Bug Lake Road and Slavia Road; as described in the proof of publication, CPH Engineers, based on staff findings and the testimony heard today.

     Under discussion, Commissioner Dallari clarified that his motion includes the elevations presented in the agenda packet today.

     Districts 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 vote AYE.

SAVANNAH PARK AT HEATHROW PUD

MAJOR AMENDMENT/SAVANNAH MERIDIAN

ACQUISITION GROUP

 

     Proof of publication, as shown on page _______, calling for a public hearing to consider approval of the Major Amendment to the Savannah Park at Heathrow Planned Unit Development (PUD), approval of the revised Final Master Plan, and approval of Addendum #2 to the Savannah Park at Heathrow PUD Developer’s Commitment Agreement, for 9.85+/- acres located on the west side of International Parkway, between Wilson Road and Wayside Drive, Savannah Meridian Acquisition Group, received and filed.

     Mr. Watkins presented the request, stating the Planning and Zoning Commission met on May 7, 2008 and voted 5 to 1 to recommend approval of the requests by the applicant.  Staff also recommends approval of the Major Amendment, revised Final Master Plan, and Addendum #2 to the Savannah Park at Heathrow PUD Developer’s Commitment Agreement.

     Chairman Carey stated the Board was just provided a document (received and filed) from Ivey Planning Group with a site plan attached.  She asked if Mr. Watkins had seen the document and if the issues had been addressed in the Development Order. 

     Mr. Watkins said he received the information late yesterday afternoon and the issues have not been addressed in the current Developer’s Commitment Agreement (DCA).  He said if the Board chooses, they can add those in the motion and staff will make the changes to the DCA.

     Commissioner Dallari stated the site plan shows the two dumpsters moved to two different locations.  He asked if the current dumpster locations would be converted to parking spaces.

     Mr. Watkins said he’s assuming they will be parking spaces, because the applicant is going to have to take more parking spaces.

     Matthew West, Ivey Planning Group, representing Savannah Meridian Acquisition Group (applicant), addressed the Board to display a site plan (received and filed) of the entire project and to state they are dealing with the 9.8 acres in the center of the project.  He gave the history of the project.  He said they now have town houses on each end with residential, retail and office in the center sharing the same buildings, with the residential atop of office and retail.  This is a true, mixed-use project.  He said most of the infrastructure is in and what is left to be done is build the actual buildings.  He said they met with the Tall Tree residents last Thursday night and explained why it has taken so long for the project to be built due to delays, credit issues and the housing market.  He also explained they are going from 20 units to 60 units because the financing group doesn’t think 20 units are enough to make them financially feasible.  The reason for going to apartments is because there is no condo market now.  He explained the site currently has 460 parking spaces and at the current County standards, the site could support 45 condos or apartments, so they are talking about an additional 15 units.  He said his clients have made it clear they must have the 60 units.  He further explained that even at peak times, due to the fact the retail, office, and residential peak at different times, there should be approximately 50 excess parking spaces.  He said the P&Z Commission and some of the residents compared this project to Winter Park Village or Colonial Town Park and said there are parking issues.  Mr. West said he doesn’t think these are the same projects and he explained the differences.  He said with the price of gas going up, there is a need for these kind of designs to try to reduce the number of trips and try to combine uses into one project.  He advised the letter distributed is their attempt to answer the homeowners’ concerns.  They are amenable to adding the items in bold type to the Developer’s Commitment Agreement.  He explained they don’t intend to lose any parking spaces but will maintain the 460.  Wherever the dumpsters used to be located, they will put additional parking spaces.  He further explained there are some slight differences between construction standards for condos and apartments and said they intend to meet the code for the project as required, so they didn’t feel the need to address construction standards in the Developer’s Commitment Agreement.  Mr. West said his client does not feel there is a rational nexus with the 60 units for putting in decorative fencing in front of the recreational facilities to offset potential trespassing.  They are willing to work with the Tall Trees’ residents on the lighting to lower it for security and to prevent light intrusion for the five homeowners.  He explained the landscape plan they are committing to, stating they will go far above the County’s requirements to buffer the five lots.  He showed two drawings (received and filed) while discussing what’s being planned for the landscaping.  He advised they don’t think gating is practical to prevent cut-through traffic into Tall Trees because his analysis shows for the parking to work, all the parking has to be available to all the uses or sharing of the parking would be moot.  He said they are willing to put up signs to discourage cut-through traffic.  However, there would be no enforcement of that.  Mr. West advised the residents wanted to know what the upgrades would be to the apartment units, but he said they don’t know that and don’t feel comfortable putting in specific upgrades in the Developer’s Commitment Agreement. 

     Commissioner McLean said he still has concerns about the parking.  In his experience, every time he has compromised on parking spaces, he has lived to regret it. 

     Mr. West said to be truly multi-modal, they would commit to having bike racks placed throughout the project so that there is an opportunity for people who live in some of the neighboring subdivisions to bike.  That might slightly reduce the traffic.  They also evaluated the site to see if they went down to 9-foot wide spaces, could they have enough parking to accommodate 56 units.  He said they won’t know if there is a parking problem until most of the buildings are built and occupied.  They do have that opportunity to go back and restripe the parking spaces.  He advised Commissioner McLean that they would be willing to put that in the DCA if there is a parking problem. 

     Chairman Carey stated she also had some questions and concerns about the parking and had some discussions with Ms. DeBord and Ms. Stettner regarding same.  She said as staff is moving forward to look at a mixed-use zoning category, the concept is that it doesn’t require two parking spaces for every unit because of the multiple use.  She thinks staff is comfortable with this request because of that.

     Joe Russo, 5065 Graylock Court, addressed the Board to state he lives directly behind this project.  He pointed out his location which is behind the dumpsters.  He said this project was originally permitted, zoned and approved for 20 condominiums.  These would be ownership units with people who would take high pride in their property and care about the land they own.  Now they are going from condominiums and tripling the number from 20 to 60 apartments.  They would have renters.  He doesn’t see that as a very good use of the space.  Now they are tripling the density, the trash and everything, not counting if anyone has guests.  They’re taking a project that was a nice transition piece and making it extremely dense for the space.  He pointed out that there is no place for the people to congregate; there is no open space for them.  The only place for the people in the rental subdivision to congregate is the parking lot, and that’s where the people are going to hang out.  The applicant is proposing to add restaurants open until 10 or 11 p.m. and 50 feet away from the restaurant, they will have people trying to get rest to go to work the next day, while other people will be hanging out in the parking lot because there is nowhere else to go.  He said he is asking for a compromise.  Forty-five units is still more than double what was originally approved, but the residents can probably live with that.  He said imagine lights 16 feet high shining down towards your house 7 days a week, 365 days a year.  That’s nuisance lighting.  He said the applicant can find ways to light the area from below and across.  He stated the applicant is proposing to move the dumpsters 20 feet.  He doesn’t know if that is going to make that much of a difference in 95 degree weather with 90% humidity.  He asked the Board to represent his voice and help them keep this project reasonable.

     Jack Gilliam, 347 Still Forest Terrace, addressed the Board to state he lives dead center to Buildings B & G of the project so he has some significant interest in it.  He would like what’s been recommended as far as concessions and proposed concessions to be written into whatever is agreed upon.  He said they are asking for a few additional concessions.  This was presented as a quality product to begin with and the residents agreed to 20 townhomes.  That’s what they expected, but that’s not what’s happening.  The density is going to be tremendous, and the parking is going to be of concern.  The people are going to park up against their back doors.  With the new traffic flow, there is supposed to be approximately 4,010 vehicles leaving and going to this project versus the originally proposed of 3,670, which adds another 340 trips per day.  If the project is successful, it will be at capacity at all times, and that is a concern.  He asked why they should forgo the building code.  Why shouldn’t they enforce the condo building code, which he believes is more stringent than the apartment code.  They are requesting to have a concession that instead of having 60 units, to have 40 or 45 units.

     Chairman Carey stated she thinks the building codes are the same for all multi-family construction, whether it’s for rental or for sale.  She asked Mr. Watkins to explain what the buffer is between the back of the building and the Tall Trees subdivision on the west side.

     Upon inquiry by Commissioner Van Der Weide, Mr. Watkins also explained where the open space is located in the project.

     Gerald Robison, 5074 Great Oak Lane, addressed the Board to state there are 135 homes in Tall Trees and all of them are in great shape.  He asked the applicant to reduce the number of the rental units.  They feel that 60 units are just too much, but 40 to 45 would be the appropriate number that they would have parking spaces for and would not have to go out and restripe. 

     No one else spoke in support or in opposition.

     Speaker Request Forms were received and filed.

     Upon inquiry by Chairman Carey, Mr. Watkins stated his understanding is that the square footage of the original project is not being changed.  He said the applicant is slightly decreasing the square footage of some of the structures for office and retail use, and it is insignificant. 

     District Commissioner Carey said she thinks a lot of the discussion the Board has had about rental versus ownership came out of the school issue.  She thinks the quality of the person you get depends on the quality of product you have.  Everything she has seen indicates that this is going to be a first-class product like the Board anticipated when they approved the amendments for the project.  She said she thinks they have to start changing the way they think about projects as they think about mixed use.  She has had an extensive discussion with staff regarding the parking and number of units to make sure they feel comfortable with that.  She thinks what the Board is seeing with this project is similar to what they will see in the Land Development Code for mixed use development.  She said she will support the change to this project with the following conditions:  include the five items identified in the letter from Ivey Planning Group regarding hours of operation, the location of the trash dumpsters, lighting between Tall Trees Subdivision and the buildings adjacent to it, additional landscaping to be placed for the best benefit to the development to the rear, and the signage.

     Commissioner McLean suggested adding the commitment that the applicant will restripe the parking spaces to 9 feet, if warranted.  Commissioner Carey agreed to that additional condition.

     Motion by Commissioner McLean, seconded by Commissioner Henley, to approve the requested Major Amendment to the Savannah Park at Heathrow Planned Unit Development (PUD); approve the revised Final Master Plan, and approve Addendum #2, as shown on page _______, to the Savannah Park at Heathrow PUD Developer’s Commitment Agreement, for 9.85+/- acres located on the west side of International Parkway, between Wilson Road and Wayside Drive; as described in the proof of publication, Savannah Meridian Acquisition Group, based on staff findings, with the five commitments identified by Commissioner Carey from the letter to Tall Trees Homeowners Association and including the commitment to restripe to 9-foot parking spaces, if necessary.

     Under discussion, Commissioner Van Der Weide expressed his concern about the open space, with no age limits on the apartments, and said it’s the quality of the open space that bothers him.

     Commissioner Dallari asked why there is no active recreation in the project.

     Mr. Watkins advised the Land Development Code does not require it.  He said they do have additional community activity centers.

     Districts 1, 2, 4 and 5 voted AYE.

     Commissioner Van Der Weide voted NAY.

C.A. STONE EAST SMALL SCALE

FUTURE LAND USE AMENDMENT

AND REZONE/CPH ENGINEERS

 

     Proof of publication, as shown on page _______, calling for a public hearing to consider enacting an Ordinance for a Small Scale Future Land Use Amendment from LDR (Low Density Residential) to PD (Planned Development) and an Ordinance rezoning from A-1 (Agriculture) to PUD (Planned Unit Development); and approval of the associated Development Order and Preliminary Master Plan for 7.36+/- acres located on the south side of Slavia Road, approximately 250 feet east of Red Bug Lake Road and Slavia Road; CPH Engineers, received and filed.

     Mr. Watkins presented the request.  He asked the Board to disregard the Development Order (copy received and filed) he distributed at the beginning of the meeting as the applicant and staff did not come to agreement on it.  He stated the P&Z Commission met on May 7, 2008 and voted 7 to 0 to recommend approval of the requested Amendment and Rezone with the following conditions:  (1) The applicant shall meet with the Red Bug Residential Coalition prior to the Board of County Commissioners meeting for the rezone and the Small Scale Future Land Use Amendment for the subject property; and (2) The applicant to dedicate a cross-access easement to the western adjacent parcel (Navidomskis Tract).  Staff is recommending approval of the Small Scale Future Land Use Amendment from LDR (Low Density Residential) to PD (Planned Development) and rezone from A-1 (Agriculture) to PUD (Planned Unit Development) and also recommends approval of the associated Development Order and Preliminary Master Plan.

     Mr. Omana stated they concur with the staff’s recommendation for approval.  He asked for clarification on the Development Order distributed to the Board at the beginning of the meeting that staff asked to be disregarded.

     Mr. Watkins explained the Development Order in the staff report is the current one that staff is bringing before the Board for approval.  He stated staff had attempted in the new Development Order to include in their recommendation the cross access easement, but staff is not in agreement on that.  The staff is not requiring that as a condition of approval.  If the Board decides the cross access easement is necessary, that is something they can add to the motion and it can be put in the Development Order.

     Commissioner McLean asked how the applicant felt about the cross access easement to the western adjacent parcel.

     Attorney Jason Merritt, 1000 Legion Place, representing the applicant, addressed the Board to state he can commit to Mr. Stone’s willingness to engage in additional discussions with Mr. Navidomskis about cross access.  He said it is not necessarily their intent to prevent cross access but they have concern with ambiguity in the language, and the staff making the determination that access is feasible or not could involve the County in a process that they consider to be one between the two property owners.  They are trying to limit the number of parties at the table as they try to determine how the site should be planned.

     Chairman Carey pointed out on the aerial map that giving cross access would only be of benefit to the owner to the west and not necessarily to Mr. Stone.  She said the Board doesn’t want to get into the middle of a legal battle.

     Tom Cook, 1575 Francois Court, representing the Red Bug Residential Coalition, addressed the Board and referred to the letter regarding the two Stone properties and stated the east property should very closely resemble the Development Order of the west property.  He reviewed the requests in that letter and said it was still in the Development Order for four stories, but they are requesting no greater than three occupied stories in the building and a maximum of 45 feet to the top ridge of the roof, not the center line of the sloped roof.  They are recommending that the applicants commit in principal to working out the cross access easement with Mr. Navidomskis. 

     Robert Navidomskis, 1999 Slavia Road, addressed the Board to state he and Mr. Stone have been neighbors for 27 years.  He said his property has outlived its intended purpose.  He said Red Bug Road is his driveway and there are times now that it’s almost impossible to get out of his property.  He explained that when the road was put in, the topography was misrepresented.  He can’t get in and out of the driveway the way it is now.  He said it has always been their intent to rezone the property.  He stated the cross access is imperative to him.  If the Zoning Commission put this as part of the motion, he would like to have it as part of the Board’s motion so that it is a part of the record. 

     No one else spoke in support or in opposition.

     Speaker Request Forms were received and filed.

     Commissioner Dallari reviewed the three elevations with Mr. Omana as provided in the agenda packets and affirmed with him that depending upon the height of the building, he would be changing elevations.  Mr. Omana stated he would commit to three stories and 45 feet.

     Attorney Merritt stated Mr. Stone’s concern is in having the latitude and flexibility as private property owners to mutually negotiate an agreement for the cross access between them that makes sense from both sides rather than having additional parties of interest involved.  He advised Commissioner Dallari that Mr. Stone would be willing to accept if he put in the Development Order that they are willing to mutually work something out on the cross access as long as the entitlements are not conditioned upon access being in a specific location, recognizing that depending upon timing and engineering factors, access may not be agreed upon. 

     Motion by Commissioner Dallari, seconded by Commissioner McLean, to enact Ordinance #2008-34, as shown on page _______, approving a Small Scale Future Land Use Amendment from LDR (Low Density Residential) to PD (Planned Development) and enact Ordinance #2008-35, as shown on page _______, rezoning from A-1 (Agriculture) to PUD (Planned Unit Development); and approve the associated Development Order, as shown on page _______, and Preliminary Master Plan for 7.36+/- acres located on the south side of Slavia Road, approximately 250 feet east of Red Bug Lake Road and Slavia Road; as described in the proof of publication, CPH Engineers, based on staff findings and adding the three different elevations (one story, two story and three stories) mentioned by Mr. Omana with a maximum 45-foot building height; and with the applicant to make a good faith effort to work out a cross access easement with Mr. Navidomskis.

     Districts 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 voted AYE.

TIMOCUAN WAY REZONE FROM A-1 TO C-3/

SUNSHINE BUILDING & DEVELOPMENT

CORP./MIKE HATTAWAY/ALBERT LAND

 

     Proof of publication, as shown on page _______, calling for a public hearing to consider enacting an Ordinance rezoning from A-1 (Agriculture) to C-3 (General Commercial & Wholesale) for approximately 3.09+/- acres located approximately .5 miles south from the intersection of General Hutchison Parkway and Timocuan Way, Sunshine Building & Development Corp./Mike Hattaway/Albert Land, received and filed.

     Joy Williams, Planner, addressed the Board to present the request, stating the Planning & Zoning Commission met on May 7, 2008 and voted 6 to 1 to recommend approval of the request to rezone.  Staff finds the request is compatible with the surrounding zoning and land use patterns, therefore, they recommend approval of the rezone request from A-1 (Agriculture) to C-3 (General Commercial & Wholesale).

     Chairman Carey advised the Board received a letter (received and filed) from the city of Longwood regarding the County’s zoning and comprehensive land policies.  Some of the information was inaccurate in the letter.  She asked Planning & Development Director Dori DeBord to clarify for the public record the allegations made in the letter.

     Ms. DeBord stated the letter makes reference to a couple of policies in the Comprehensive Plan.  Policy Future Land Use (FLU) 2.5 talks about looking at compatibility between opposing adjacent land uses.  She said the subject property is already Industrial land use and they are not taking up a land use issue on this property but are taking up the zoning.  The second issue is the discussion of the types of zoning districts permitted within each type of land use category.  She identified the different zoning districts the Industrial land use category allows for.  She said the C-3 being asked for seems to be compatible with the C-3 that’s already in the area, and compatible with property that is next to this site.  She said one thing staff would like the Board to keep in mind is that the C-3 requires the active/passive buffer which A-1 zoning does not.  Any type of industrial zoning or commercial zoning would require more buffering from the neighbors than is currently allowed in the A-1 district.

     Chairman Carey advised that the Board received this afternoon a request (copy of e-mail received and filed) from two of the residents asking for a continuance of this public hearing.  Upon her direction, Mr. McMillan explained how continuances are requested and handled.

     Chairman Carey submitted the letter from the city of Longwood, letters of opposition (received and filed), and copies of Petitions, as shown on page, _______, in opposition to the rezone from citizens. 

     Mike Hattaway, 840 Waterway Place, addressed the Board to state what they are asking for is consistency with the land use map, and the land use map says the property is Industrial.  He said the property has been Industrial since at least 1980 and possibly since the mid 1970’s.  He said wanting to be sensitive to the neighborhood, they applied for C-3 zoning which is a commercial/wholesale type of zoning.  They have come down four notches from the top Industrial zoning in an effort to be good neighbors in their request.  He highlighted some of the things in the staff report (pages 3 and 5) on the staff findings and said staff found that this is a transitional use of the property.  He showed an aerial (not received and filed) and gave a history of the area, noting that this has been a commercial/industrial area for many years.  He stated the Comprehensive Plan recognizes that in areas where there is Industrial adjacent to residential areas, it shall be light industrial.  They are actually going below that, and he thinks they are being reasonable in their request.  He read the County’s active/passive buffer regulation and said that would be applied to this property.  He said Mr. Bush has used the property for six years with a very light use.  They would like to continue use of the property at no more of an intense use.  He said if the Commission approves this application, they will immediately erect an earthern berm on the eastern side adjacent to the homes, as described in the active buffer component of Sec. 30.1232 of the Land Development Code.  This is in addition to the existing fence already there and the extensive natural landscaping on the property.  On the south side, they would immediately construct a six-foot wooden or vinyl fence.  He said on that side of the property is an existing 30’ drainage ditch that is about eight feet deep in most areas, then there is fencing of those homeowners who have a fence, the fence they will put up, plus trees, and about 60 feet of front yard on the two existing homes.  He said this will be a tremendous buffer on the south side.  Further, they are committing at this time that at any time any building is proposed for the property, they will construct the earthern berm at six feet along the south side of the property at that time.  They will also immediately, for Mr. Bush’s use, comply with the site plan requirements.

     Commissioner Henley said he met yesterday with some of the residents and had a conversation last night with Mr. Hattaway regarding some of things that could be done.  Based upon the letters and information that has come in and in meeting with some of the residents, he would like to clarify some things.  He asked Mr. Hattaway what uses have been going on on the property.

     Mr. Hattaway advised Mr. Bush is in the infrastructure underground business, where he does lift stations, putting in borings underneath roads and things like that.  He explained that Mr. Bush’s work is a lighter type work on a much smaller scale than Mr. Fields’ business on the adjacent property.  Mr. Hattaway described the kind of equipment Mr. Bush uses and stated there is absolutely no work performed on the site unless there is work to improve the site like putting in sod.  He stated he knows of no code violation that may have been issued to Mr. Bush. 

     Chairman Carey advised she understood from Code Enforcement that the site needed to be cleaned up, but they probably have not issued any citations.

     Commissioner Henley further asked if this request is approved, are there any immediate plans to develop this property.  Mr. Hattaway stated there are no immediate plans to develop if the request is approved, and there are no plans for a cement factory.

     Chairman Carey stated if the zoning is approved and the current property owner wants to come in and use the property, he would have to submit a site plan and do certain things.  However, if rezoned and someone wanted to come in and put in a cement plant, that is allowable in C-3 and that could happen as well. 

     Ms. DeBord explained what would need to happen if Mr. Bush would like to continue to use the property if it is rezoned, including submitting a site plan and coming under the active/passive buffer requirements.  Also, any future development would require another site plan.

     Butch Bundy, 721 Eagle Avenue, representing the Longwood City Commission, addressed the Board to state the City is not against development.  They are concerned that once the zoning change is allowed to go into effect, any allowable business in C-3 zoning would be allowed in that area.  He said the problem is they don’t know what would go there, as there is no site plan.  He noted that the access road improvements would have to be brought up to County standards.  They are requesting the Board deny the zoning change, but if the Commission does approve the change, the City would like that the approval be contingent upon when the access road is improved, and the same standards be brought along the entire portion of the access road.

     Chairman Carey said those issues will be dealt with when the property comes through for a site plan change.

     Mr. Bundy stated, if approved, they would like restrictions placed on the usage to not allow any wholesale meat and produce distribution facilities, no manufacturing facilities, and any commercial activity would take place on the northern end of the property adjacent to existing industrial with any retention areas to be on the southern and eastern ends of the property. 

     Cindy Bieloh, 748 Meadowlark Court N., representing Skylark residents, addressed the Board to speak in opposition.  She asked those in opposition to stand and approximately six persons stood in the audience.  She said there are 60 signatures in opposition that were submitted earlier on petitions.  She stated they have had to endure heavy equipment causing the ground to rumble and shake, extremely loud noise problems, beeping when backing up (even in the middle of the night), and activity sometimes 24 hours a day.  She said diesel fumes have been in her yard.  There were pipes, debris and junk in the yard behind her.  She thought for years the subject property was a scrap yard.  She stated the debris has been temporarily removed from the yard, but she attended an open house and it was declared that the owner intends to move all the equipment back and resume activities.  If this is zoned to C-3, it could be even worse.  She said over the years, she has personally seen dumping and draining of chemicals and liquids directly behind their homes; and vehicles and equipment have been washed directly behind her fence.  She has been unable to operate her home business due to the noise, disruption and ground shaking.  She asked what takes precedence, her business that came first or their business that came after hers.  She said on the side that has already been zoned C-3, those residents had to endure, not only the noise and the trucks from the commercial activity, but the fear of chemical fumes and toxic dust in their yards.  If this property is zoned to C-3, that could happen to them.  She said this brings intense concern for the environment and Big Tree Park, which is in close proximity to the property.  Because the subject property is elevated, chemicals or oils from commercial activity could go into the wetlands and the Big Tree Park area, home of the Senator and Lady Liberty.  She said they must protect this national treasure.  She said the noise and groundwater contamination could disrupt wildlife and place at further risk endangered species in the area.  The Florida Nature Trail is also north of this property.  She said Seminole County is committed to protecting the environment, and if this rezone were approved, wouldn’t it be a contradiction to the environmental intentions of the County.  She said to the east and south of the property is residential and to the north is an environmentally protected area.  She asked the Commission to keep the zoning compatible with the other three sides of the property that have been in place for at least 30 years.

     Commissioner Henley advised Ms. Bieloh that he nor his office has received one complaint from the Skylark residents.  He said if it’s as bad as Ms. Bieloh said, why has he not heard about it.  The only complaint he received was after this rezoning was requested.  He asked if the Commissioners are to believe that all the conditions she described has occurred as a result of this particular lot.

     Ms. Bieloh said it’s in conjunction with the adjacent property to the west that has been having on-going C-3 activities with a tremendous amount of equipment, pipes and debris.

     Commissioner Henley stated he has not been able to determine that the type of equipment that Mr. Bush uses would cause all the ground shaking that Ms. Bieloh would feel 100 feet or so away. 

     Ms. Bieloh said she can only testify to what she has seen personally, experienced and witnessed.  The other property is three acres over and she can’t imagine all the ground shaking is coming from that property.  She said there is a lot of activity going on behind her.

     Robert Meeks, 740 Meadowlark Court N., addressed the Board to state to him it is a strong clash to have C-3 next to R-1.  He can’t find any good reason to have heavy equipment loaded, unloaded, and maintained right next to residential properties.  It doesn’t seem appropriate to him.  He said he can testify to experiencing the ground shaking on a regular basis.  It has curtailed since this zoning issue has come up.  The property is cleaned up, and everything has changed and been very quiet.  He can definitely say anything from the size of a tank being unloaded from a trailer and being loaded back on a trailer is going to make noise and ground-shaking disturbances.  He said it was at different times of the day and night prior to 7:00 a.m. in the morning.  He can’t say if it came from this property or the Fields property.  He said he has worked in underground construction for five or six years on a smaller scale.  He knows from maintaining equipment, cleaning it and making repairs that hydraulic fluid, diesel fuel, oil leaks and grease are unavoidable.  He is concerned about what kind of issues might be in the soil currently and if this is allowed and, with the other property next to his, how is this going to affect the environment and him.  He expressed his concern about contamination in the future.

     Chairman Carey advised one of the reasons the owner would have to submit a site plan to continue to use the property would be to address all the issues including the active/passive buffer and how they are going to take care of the trucks.

     Mr. Meeks said, in regard to the buffers, if the Commission does approve this request, he hopes they approve it with conditions for very strong buffers. 

     Chairman Carey explained that this is a straight zoning request and there is no negotiating on that.  She advised Mr. Meeks that staff can contact him when the site plan is submitted if the rezoning goes forward.

     Ms. DeBord clarified for the Record that concrete plants are not allowed in C-3 zoning, but in M-1 zoning districts.

     Becky Kelly, 138 Clear Lake Circle, addressed the Board to state if the zoning changes, she is asking that the maximum allowed buffering walls be done before the property owners/applicant can go on to anything else.  This would show good faith that they will hold to their word.  She said the Big Tree Park is so important to so many children and she doesn’t know if you can put a price on that.  She asked why is now the time to change.  She said the Commissioners are all voted in and they need to listen to the people who voted them in; really pay attention to them and not just one person who owns property.  She said the applicant cannot guarantee what he’s saying today for the future. 

     Chairman Carey stated she understood there was a code violation on the property and she understood Ms. Kelly’s frustration with code enforcement, and though the Board has heard her concerns, they are here today to deal with the rezoning.

     No one else spoke in support or in opposition.

     Speaker Request Forms were received and filed.

     Chairman Carey clarified what Ms. DeBord said and what the staff report says.  If this project is approved, there are certain issues the property owner would have to deal with before he can utilize the property for a C-3 zoning.  All those conditions would have to be met before he can move forward.

     District Commissioner Henley stated the Board has heard and received a lot of letters and opinions.  They were opinions expressed by individuals and they have a right to their opinion, but they understand that opinions are not necessarily evidence.  He said he has not received any hard evidence on which the Board could base a denial of this request.  It is within the land use and is a continuation of everything that exists along the road, therefore, he recommended approval of the request.

     Motion by Commissioner Henley, seconded by Commissioner McLean, to enact Ordinance #2008-36, as shown on page _______, approving rezoning from A-1 (Agriculture) to C-3 (General Commercial & Wholesale) for 3.09+/- acres located approximately .5 miles south from the intersection of General Hutchison Parkway and Timocuan Way; as described in the proof of publication, Sunshine Building & Development Corp./Mike Hattaway/Albert Land, based on staff findings and including the conditions agreed to by Mr. Hattaway.

     Under discussion, Chairman Carey stated if this property were able to be accessible any other way besides Timocuan Way, she would not vote to approve it; however, everything along Timocuan is Industrial and she feels this is appropriate for the property.  She said she would be interested to see the site plan at the time it comes back through before the property begins to be used again.

     Districts 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 voted AYE.

AMENDMENTS TO CHAPTER 40, PART 12,

SEMINOLE COUNTY CODE

 

     Proof of publication, as shown on page ________, calling for a public hearing to consider adoption of an Ordinance amending Sections 40.262, 40.267, and 40.268 of Chapter 40, Part 12, Seminole County Code, revising certain terms, conditions and requirements for the County’s Affordable Housing Committee (AHAC) membership tenure, duties and responsibilities in conformance with Section 420.9076, Florida Statutes; providing for codification; providing for severability and providing an effective date, received and filed.

     Shelley McHaney, SHIP Program Manager, addressed the Board to present the request, stating staff recommends adoption of the Ordinance.

     No one spoke in support or in opposition.

     Motion by Commissioner Dallari, seconded by Commissioner Henley, to enact Ordinance #2008-37, as shown on page _______, amending Sections 40.262, 40.267, and 40.268 of Chapter 40, Part 12, Seminole County Code, revising certain terms, conditions and requirements for the County’s Affordable Housing Committee (AHAC) membership tenure, duties and responsibilities in conformance with Section 420.9076, Florida Statutes; providing for codification; providing for severability and providing an effective date; as described in the proof of publication.

     Districts 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 voted AYE.

COUNTY MANAGER’S CONSENT AGENDA, Continued

     Motion by Commissioner Henley, seconded by Commissioner Van Der Weide, to approve and authorize the following:

Community Services

Community Assistance

55.  Adopt appropriate Resolution #2008-R-164, as shown on page _______, amending the Seminole County Administrative Code Section 4 to form an ongoing, 11 member Affordable Housing Advisory Committee (AHAC) as required by Florida Statute 420.9076(2) and Florida Administrative Code 67-37.010.

 

56.  Adopt appropriate Resolution #2008-R-165, as shown on page ______, for the following nominees/appointment to the Affordable Housing Advisory Committee (AHAC):  Richard Kovacsik; Kenneth York; Ken Ritter; Kenneth Bentley; Thomas Denove; Robert Kinney; April Kaiser; Melanie Chase; Krissy Todd; Melvin Philpot; and Kip Beacham.

 

Districts 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 voted AYE.

 

COUNTY ATTORNEY’S CONSENT AGENDA, Continued

 

County Attorney’s Office

Other

 

     Chairman Carey stated Mr. McMillan has redrafted the information based on the discussion this morning regarding Administrative Code Section 3.51, “Commissioner Travel.” 

     Mr. McMillan stated in the definition he left the 60-mile rule only because it relates to getting prior Board approval for travel outside the 60-mile range.  In the section about use of private vehicles, it provides that reimbursement for private vehicles would not be authorized for travel confined to territorial Seminole County.

     Motion by Commissioner Van Der Weide, seconded by Commissioner Henley, to adopt appropriate Resolution #2008-R-160, as shown on page ________, amending the Administrative Code Section 3.51, Commissioner Travel. 

     Districts 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 voted AYE.

REGULAR AGENDA, Continued

     Mr. McMillan stated he has revised the resolution (copy received and filed) regarding Item #46, Request to establish Oviedo Community Redevelopment Agency (CRA), and provided each of the Commissioners with a copy.  This has been reviewed by the attorney for the City.  He said he made some slight changes to accommodate the City’s comments and put in a 20-year restriction the County Commissioners asked for.

     Chairman Carey noted that the resolution also has the caveat that the city of Oviedo has to adopt the resolution by July 1, 2008, and have until Year 2010 to create the CRA.

     Motion by Commissioner Dallari, seconded by Commissioner Van Der Weide, to approve and adopt appropriate, revised Resolution #2008-R-163, as shown on page _______, that delegates to the city of Oviedo the authority to establish a Community Redevelopment Agency, as submitted by the County Attorney, and accept the Finding of Necessity Report, as shown on page _______, to establish the Community Redevelopment Area.

     Districts 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 voted AYE.

     The City of Oviedo CRA Delegation of Authority Resolution was received and filed.

     E-mail from Property Appraiser David Johnson to Commissioner Henley regarding the taxable value of the proposed Oviedo CRA was received and filed.

     Letters and e-mails to Commissioner Henley in support of the Oviedo CRA were also received and filed.

-------

     Motion by Commissioner Dallari to direct that in good faith the County staff (County Manager) speak with the city of Oviedo to try to work out an agreement with the City on a redevelopment plan with no financial commitment at this time, and bring this back before the Board.

     Under discussion, Chairman Carey said it might be prudent to take this up after the new City Manager is seated so he can work with the County Manager.

     Whereupon, Commissioner Dallari agreed that would be fine.

     Commissioner Henley asked staff to figure out a way to avoid the situation they ran into with the city of Casselberry.

     Commissioner Van Der Weide seconded the motion.

     Districts 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 voted AYE.

COUNTY ATTORNEY’S REPORT

     Mr. McMillan reported, for information only, that the County received a ruling from the Circuit Court last Friday on the appeal of the Rustling Oaks Rezoning which was denied about two years ago.  The property is located on McCulloch and Iron Bridge Road in District 1.  Judge Galuzzo upheld the County’s decision two years ago and the denial of the appeal was upheld.

PUBLIC COMMENTS

 

     Robert King, 2211 Black Hammock, addressed the Board to reiterate he’s present today because of all the noise problems at his house.  He said the Commissioners suggested, about six months ago, that he address his concerns to the Sheriff and he did so.  He further said he’s at the point now where he’s about to have it explained to him again by the Sheriff that the rules don’t apply in his neighborhood.  He stated what he needs from the Board is for that explanation to be made to the Commissioners by the Sheriff so that he doesn’t go around this circle one more time and waste another year or two or three of his life.  He said he is going to ask the Sheriff’s Office to come and explain to the Commissioners on the public record so they can hear it.  He indicated that he’s trying to be as patient as he can, however, his life is ticking by.  His taking off from work to come and speak during business hours is worth money to him.  He said the same rules should be enforced in his neighborhood and he should get the same respect that everyone else in the County receives.  He added that he is not exempt from that respect. 

     Chairman Carey asked that Ms. Coto and Ms. DeBord meet together with Sheriff Eslinger and get an update on this issue, and see if there is something that needs to come back to the Board or if this needs to be taken up in a different venue.

     Speaker Request Form for Mr. King was received and filed.

-------

     John Horvath, 1004 Bradford Drive, addressed the Board to state he agrees with the Commissioners’ endorsement of the consolidation of the Winter Springs Fire Department with Seminole County, and the comments made that they need to look at consolidating other services as well.  He said he noticed on Orange County’s fire trucks that they have a special logo.  Also, he’s backing Myregion.org because they are a regional area and they need to work together as problems don’t end at a county or city line.  In reference to the taxes, he thinks the Board needs to get information out to the people on what’s going to happen with some of the amendments and things coming down the road.  He said they’re not going to see the affect this year, but it’s going to be two or three years down the road.

     Speaker Request Form for Mr. Horvath was received and filed.

-------

     There being no further business to come before the Board, the Chairman declared the meeting adjourned at 3:58 p.m., this same date.

 

ATTEST _____________________ Clerk ____________________ Chairman er/cc